临时支固器使用的国际调查:对正畸医师的调查

IF 2.6 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Kelsea Y. Ashton , Shuying S. Jiang , Mary Anne Melo , Jose A. Bosio
{"title":"临时支固器使用的国际调查:对正畸医师的调查","authors":"Kelsea Y. Ashton ,&nbsp;Shuying S. Jiang ,&nbsp;Mary Anne Melo ,&nbsp;Jose A. Bosio","doi":"10.1016/j.ejwf.2023.04.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This study investigates characteristics of temporary anchorage devices (TADs) use by surveying a sample of international orthodontists. Furthermore, the survey investigates the stability, insertion technique, and failure rate of TADs and professionals’ experience in residency, and it also attempts to establish guidelines for its use in everyday practice.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A 19-question survey was sent to orthodontists worldwide asking opinion-based, case-specific, and placement technique questions regarding TADs. Results were collected from 251 survey respondents. The country/regions of practice and length of time practicing orthodontics were the independent variables.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Survey respondents indicated that most orthodontists rarely or sporadically use TADs. Significant differences were also found for TAD utilization purposes, sizes, and placement techniques among different countries/regions and for failure rates (1 or more of the last 6 TADs placed failed—61.6%). A significant difference was found in how many TADs orthodontists placed in residency versus private practice (56% vs. 15%) in relation to how long they have been practicing, but it did not greatly affect the frequency of use, mechanics, or placement technique.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The frequency of TAD use is similar in many different countries and among different age groups. Although the collected responses suggested significant differences among respondents from different countries, the variability of results for TAD use worldwide prevent the establishment of clear guidelines.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":43456,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists","volume":"12 3","pages":"Pages 93-104"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"International investigation on temporary anchorage device use: A survey of orthodontists\",\"authors\":\"Kelsea Y. Ashton ,&nbsp;Shuying S. Jiang ,&nbsp;Mary Anne Melo ,&nbsp;Jose A. Bosio\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejwf.2023.04.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This study investigates characteristics of temporary anchorage devices (TADs) use by surveying a sample of international orthodontists. Furthermore, the survey investigates the stability, insertion technique, and failure rate of TADs and professionals’ experience in residency, and it also attempts to establish guidelines for its use in everyday practice.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A 19-question survey was sent to orthodontists worldwide asking opinion-based, case-specific, and placement technique questions regarding TADs. Results were collected from 251 survey respondents. The country/regions of practice and length of time practicing orthodontics were the independent variables.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Survey respondents indicated that most orthodontists rarely or sporadically use TADs. Significant differences were also found for TAD utilization purposes, sizes, and placement techniques among different countries/regions and for failure rates (1 or more of the last 6 TADs placed failed—61.6%). A significant difference was found in how many TADs orthodontists placed in residency versus private practice (56% vs. 15%) in relation to how long they have been practicing, but it did not greatly affect the frequency of use, mechanics, or placement technique.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The frequency of TAD use is similar in many different countries and among different age groups. Although the collected responses suggested significant differences among respondents from different countries, the variability of results for TAD use worldwide prevent the establishment of clear guidelines.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43456,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 93-104\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221244382300036X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221244382300036X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景本研究通过对国际口腔正畸医师的抽样调查,探讨了临时固定器(TADs)的使用特点。此外,该调查调查了TAD的稳定性、插入技术和失败率以及专业人员的住院经验,并试图为其在日常实践中的使用制定指导方针。方法向世界各地的正畸医生发送一份19个问题的调查,询问有关TAD的基于意见、特定病例和安置技术的问题。调查结果来自251名受访者。执业国家/地区和正畸执业时间是自变量。结果调查对象表明,大多数正畸医生很少或偶尔使用TAD。不同国家/地区的TAD使用目的、规模和安置技术以及失败率也存在显著差异(最后6个安置的TAD中有1个或多个失败,占61.6%)。住院和私人执业的TAD正畸医生的数量(56%对15%)与他们执业的时间存在显著差异,但它并没有对使用频率、力学或放置技术产生太大影响。结论TAD的使用频率在许多不同的国家和不同的年龄组之间是相似的。尽管收集到的回复表明,来自不同国家的受访者之间存在显著差异,但全世界TAD使用结果的可变性阻碍了制定明确的指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
International investigation on temporary anchorage device use: A survey of orthodontists

Background

This study investigates characteristics of temporary anchorage devices (TADs) use by surveying a sample of international orthodontists. Furthermore, the survey investigates the stability, insertion technique, and failure rate of TADs and professionals’ experience in residency, and it also attempts to establish guidelines for its use in everyday practice.

Methods

A 19-question survey was sent to orthodontists worldwide asking opinion-based, case-specific, and placement technique questions regarding TADs. Results were collected from 251 survey respondents. The country/regions of practice and length of time practicing orthodontics were the independent variables.

Results

Survey respondents indicated that most orthodontists rarely or sporadically use TADs. Significant differences were also found for TAD utilization purposes, sizes, and placement techniques among different countries/regions and for failure rates (1 or more of the last 6 TADs placed failed—61.6%). A significant difference was found in how many TADs orthodontists placed in residency versus private practice (56% vs. 15%) in relation to how long they have been practicing, but it did not greatly affect the frequency of use, mechanics, or placement technique.

Conclusions

The frequency of TAD use is similar in many different countries and among different age groups. Although the collected responses suggested significant differences among respondents from different countries, the variability of results for TAD use worldwide prevent the establishment of clear guidelines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists
Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信