建立基于临界的意识状态改变概念框架的范围审查。

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience Pub Date : 2023-05-25 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnsys.2023.1085902
Charles Gervais, Louis-Philippe Boucher, Guillermo Martinez Villar, UnCheol Lee, Catherine Duclos
{"title":"建立基于临界的意识状态改变概念框架的范围审查。","authors":"Charles Gervais,&nbsp;Louis-Philippe Boucher,&nbsp;Guillermo Martinez Villar,&nbsp;UnCheol Lee,&nbsp;Catherine Duclos","doi":"10.3389/fnsys.2023.1085902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The healthy conscious brain is thought to operate near a critical state, reflecting optimal information processing and high susceptibility to external stimuli. Conversely, deviations from the critical state are hypothesized to give rise to altered states of consciousness (ASC). Measures of criticality could therefore be an effective way of establishing the conscious state of an individual. Furthermore, characterizing the direction of a deviation from criticality may enable the development of treatment strategies for pathological ASC. The aim of this <i>scoping review</i> is to assess the current evidence supporting the criticality hypothesis, and the use of criticality as a conceptual framework for ASC. Using the PRISMA guidelines, Web of Science and PubMed were searched from inception to February 7th 2022 to find articles relating to measures of criticality across ASC. <i>N</i> = 427 independent papers were initially found on the subject. <i>N</i> = 378 were excluded because they were either: not related to criticality; not related to consciousness; not presenting results from a primary study; presenting model data. <i>N</i> = 49 independent papers were included in the present research, separated in 7 sub-categories of ASC: disorders of consciousness (DOC) (<i>n</i> = 5); sleep (<i>n</i> = 13); anesthesia (<i>n</i> = 18); epilepsy (<i>n</i> = 12); psychedelics and shamanic state of consciousness (<i>n</i> = 4); delirium (<i>n</i> = 1); meditative state (<i>n</i> = 2). Each category included articles suggesting a deviation of the critical state. While most studies were only able to identify a deviation from criticality without being certain of its direction, the preliminary consensus arising from the literature is that non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep reflects a subcritical state, epileptic seizures reflect a supercritical state, and psychedelics are closer to the critical state than normal consciousness. This scoping review suggests that, though the literature is limited and methodologically inhomogeneous, ASC are characterized by a deviation from criticality, though its direction is not clearly reported in a majority of studies. Criticality could become, with more extensive research, an effective and objective way to characterize ASC, and help identify therapeutic avenues to improve criticality in pathological brain states. Furthermore, we suggest how anesthesia and psychedelics could potentially be used as neuromodulation techniques to restore criticality in DOC.</p>","PeriodicalId":12649,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10248073/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A scoping review for building a criticality-based conceptual framework of altered states of consciousness.\",\"authors\":\"Charles Gervais,&nbsp;Louis-Philippe Boucher,&nbsp;Guillermo Martinez Villar,&nbsp;UnCheol Lee,&nbsp;Catherine Duclos\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fnsys.2023.1085902\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The healthy conscious brain is thought to operate near a critical state, reflecting optimal information processing and high susceptibility to external stimuli. Conversely, deviations from the critical state are hypothesized to give rise to altered states of consciousness (ASC). Measures of criticality could therefore be an effective way of establishing the conscious state of an individual. Furthermore, characterizing the direction of a deviation from criticality may enable the development of treatment strategies for pathological ASC. The aim of this <i>scoping review</i> is to assess the current evidence supporting the criticality hypothesis, and the use of criticality as a conceptual framework for ASC. Using the PRISMA guidelines, Web of Science and PubMed were searched from inception to February 7th 2022 to find articles relating to measures of criticality across ASC. <i>N</i> = 427 independent papers were initially found on the subject. <i>N</i> = 378 were excluded because they were either: not related to criticality; not related to consciousness; not presenting results from a primary study; presenting model data. <i>N</i> = 49 independent papers were included in the present research, separated in 7 sub-categories of ASC: disorders of consciousness (DOC) (<i>n</i> = 5); sleep (<i>n</i> = 13); anesthesia (<i>n</i> = 18); epilepsy (<i>n</i> = 12); psychedelics and shamanic state of consciousness (<i>n</i> = 4); delirium (<i>n</i> = 1); meditative state (<i>n</i> = 2). Each category included articles suggesting a deviation of the critical state. While most studies were only able to identify a deviation from criticality without being certain of its direction, the preliminary consensus arising from the literature is that non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep reflects a subcritical state, epileptic seizures reflect a supercritical state, and psychedelics are closer to the critical state than normal consciousness. This scoping review suggests that, though the literature is limited and methodologically inhomogeneous, ASC are characterized by a deviation from criticality, though its direction is not clearly reported in a majority of studies. Criticality could become, with more extensive research, an effective and objective way to characterize ASC, and help identify therapeutic avenues to improve criticality in pathological brain states. Furthermore, we suggest how anesthesia and psychedelics could potentially be used as neuromodulation techniques to restore criticality in DOC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12649,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10248073/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2023.1085902\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2023.1085902","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

健康的意识大脑被认为在临界状态附近运行,反映出最佳的信息处理和对外部刺激的高度敏感性。相反,假设偏离临界状态会导致意识状态的改变(ASC)。因此,衡量临界状态可能是建立个人意识状态的有效方法。此外,表征偏离临界状态的方向可能有助于制定病理性ASC的治疗策略。本范围审查的目的是评估支持关键性假设的当前证据,以及将关键性作为ASC的概念框架的使用。使用PRISMA指南,从成立到2022年2月7日,对科学网和PubMed进行了搜索,以查找与ASC临界度测量相关的文章。最初发现了427篇关于这一主题的独立论文。N=378人被排除在外,因为他们要么:与临界性无关;与意识无关;未提供初步研究的结果;呈现模型数据。本研究共收录49篇独立论文,分为ASC的7个子类:意识障碍(DOC)(N=5);睡眠(n=13);麻醉(n=18);癫痫(n=12);迷幻药和萨满意识状态(n=4);谵妄(n=1);冥想状态(n=2)。每一类都包括暗示临界状态偏离的文章。虽然大多数研究只能在不确定其方向的情况下确定临界状态的偏差,但文献中出现的初步共识是,非快速眼动(NREM)睡眠反映了亚临界状态,癫痫发作反映了超临界状态,迷幻药比正常意识更接近临界状态。这篇范围界定综述表明,尽管文献有限,方法不均匀,但ASC的特征是偏离临界性,尽管在大多数研究中没有明确报告其方向。通过更广泛的研究,临界性可能成为表征ASC的有效和客观的方法,并有助于确定改善病理性大脑状态临界性的治疗途径。此外,我们建议如何潜在地使用麻醉和致幻剂作为神经调控技术来恢复DOC的关键性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A scoping review for building a criticality-based conceptual framework of altered states of consciousness.

The healthy conscious brain is thought to operate near a critical state, reflecting optimal information processing and high susceptibility to external stimuli. Conversely, deviations from the critical state are hypothesized to give rise to altered states of consciousness (ASC). Measures of criticality could therefore be an effective way of establishing the conscious state of an individual. Furthermore, characterizing the direction of a deviation from criticality may enable the development of treatment strategies for pathological ASC. The aim of this scoping review is to assess the current evidence supporting the criticality hypothesis, and the use of criticality as a conceptual framework for ASC. Using the PRISMA guidelines, Web of Science and PubMed were searched from inception to February 7th 2022 to find articles relating to measures of criticality across ASC. N = 427 independent papers were initially found on the subject. N = 378 were excluded because they were either: not related to criticality; not related to consciousness; not presenting results from a primary study; presenting model data. N = 49 independent papers were included in the present research, separated in 7 sub-categories of ASC: disorders of consciousness (DOC) (n = 5); sleep (n = 13); anesthesia (n = 18); epilepsy (n = 12); psychedelics and shamanic state of consciousness (n = 4); delirium (n = 1); meditative state (n = 2). Each category included articles suggesting a deviation of the critical state. While most studies were only able to identify a deviation from criticality without being certain of its direction, the preliminary consensus arising from the literature is that non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep reflects a subcritical state, epileptic seizures reflect a supercritical state, and psychedelics are closer to the critical state than normal consciousness. This scoping review suggests that, though the literature is limited and methodologically inhomogeneous, ASC are characterized by a deviation from criticality, though its direction is not clearly reported in a majority of studies. Criticality could become, with more extensive research, an effective and objective way to characterize ASC, and help identify therapeutic avenues to improve criticality in pathological brain states. Furthermore, we suggest how anesthesia and psychedelics could potentially be used as neuromodulation techniques to restore criticality in DOC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience Neuroscience-Developmental Neuroscience
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
144
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research that advances our understanding of whole systems of the brain, including those involved in sensation, movement, learning and memory, attention, reward, decision-making, reasoning, executive functions, and emotions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信