使用血管筛选装置(VaSera®)对心室-动脉耦合的初步估计。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
David Kanyinda Kayembe, Koji Hosokawa, Yurie Obata, Tetsuro Isada, Hiroko Shigemi, Kenji Shigemi
{"title":"使用血管筛选装置(VaSera®)对心室-动脉耦合的初步估计。","authors":"David Kanyinda Kayembe,&nbsp;Koji Hosokawa,&nbsp;Yurie Obata,&nbsp;Tetsuro Isada,&nbsp;Hiroko Shigemi,&nbsp;Kenji Shigemi","doi":"10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2023_90-212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-invasive cardiovascular assessment has become an alternative to invasive techniques. VaSera<sup>®</sup>, a vascular screening device, measures arterial stiffness with the cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI); it also measures cardiophysiological variables of ejection time (ET) and pre-ejection period (PEP). We aimed to apply the parameters obtained by VaSera<sup>®</sup> to estimate heart function based on left ventricular end-systolic elastance/arterial elastance (Ees/Ea) and to assess the minimal required number of measurements for estimation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an experimental laboratory study for healthy volunteers. Using the previously established formula, the Ees/Ea value of each participant was estimated using ET and PEP values measured by VaSera<sup>®</sup>. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) assessed the minimum required number of measurements. Concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and Bland and Altman analysis assessed variation of Ees/Ea estimation against the trimmed average.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 660 measurements from 132 participants were included. The Ees/Ea estimates from the VaSera<sup>®</sup> were 1.5 [1.2, 1.9]. The ICC for Ees/Ea was 0.71 (95% confidence interval: 0.65-0.77), suggesting that four measurements were required. The CCC between the trimmed average of Ees/Ea and the mean of four Ees/Ea estimates was 0.99. Bland and Altman analysis showed excellent agreement for the mean of four Ees/Ea estimates and the trimmed average of Ees/Ea.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For screening of heart failure, the Ees/Ea estimated using non-invasive vascular-stiffness assessment device would be tolerable and four sequential measurements were required.</p>","PeriodicalId":56076,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nippon Medical School","volume":"90 2","pages":"220-227"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Pilot Estimation of Ventricular-Arterial Coupling Using a Vascular Screening Device (VaSera<sup>®</sup>).\",\"authors\":\"David Kanyinda Kayembe,&nbsp;Koji Hosokawa,&nbsp;Yurie Obata,&nbsp;Tetsuro Isada,&nbsp;Hiroko Shigemi,&nbsp;Kenji Shigemi\",\"doi\":\"10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2023_90-212\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-invasive cardiovascular assessment has become an alternative to invasive techniques. VaSera<sup>®</sup>, a vascular screening device, measures arterial stiffness with the cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI); it also measures cardiophysiological variables of ejection time (ET) and pre-ejection period (PEP). We aimed to apply the parameters obtained by VaSera<sup>®</sup> to estimate heart function based on left ventricular end-systolic elastance/arterial elastance (Ees/Ea) and to assess the minimal required number of measurements for estimation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an experimental laboratory study for healthy volunteers. Using the previously established formula, the Ees/Ea value of each participant was estimated using ET and PEP values measured by VaSera<sup>®</sup>. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) assessed the minimum required number of measurements. Concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and Bland and Altman analysis assessed variation of Ees/Ea estimation against the trimmed average.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 660 measurements from 132 participants were included. The Ees/Ea estimates from the VaSera<sup>®</sup> were 1.5 [1.2, 1.9]. The ICC for Ees/Ea was 0.71 (95% confidence interval: 0.65-0.77), suggesting that four measurements were required. The CCC between the trimmed average of Ees/Ea and the mean of four Ees/Ea estimates was 0.99. Bland and Altman analysis showed excellent agreement for the mean of four Ees/Ea estimates and the trimmed average of Ees/Ea.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For screening of heart failure, the Ees/Ea estimated using non-invasive vascular-stiffness assessment device would be tolerable and four sequential measurements were required.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nippon Medical School\",\"volume\":\"90 2\",\"pages\":\"220-227\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nippon Medical School\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2023_90-212\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nippon Medical School","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2023_90-212","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:无创心血管评估已成为有创技术的替代方案。VaSera®是一种血管筛查设备,通过心踝血管指数(CAVI)测量动脉硬度;它还测量射血时间(ET)和射血前期(PEP)的心脏生理变量。我们的目的是应用VaSera®获得的参数来估计基于左心室收缩末期弹性/动脉弹性(Ees/Ea)的心功能,并评估估算所需的最小测量次数。方法:对健康志愿者进行实验室实验研究。使用先前建立的公式,使用VaSera®测量的ET和PEP值估计每个参与者的Ees/Ea值。类内相关系数(ICC)评估所需的最小测量次数。一致性相关系数(CCC)和Bland和Altman分析评估了Ees/Ea估计相对于修剪平均值的变化。结果:共纳入了来自132名参与者的660项测量。VaSera®的Ees/Ea估计为1.5[1.2,1.9]。Ees/Ea的ICC为0.71(95%置信区间:0.65-0.77),表明需要进行四次测量。修剪后的Ees/Ea平均值与四个Ees/Ea估计的平均值之间的CCC为0.99。Bland和Altman分析显示,四个Ees/Ea估计的平均值和修剪后的Ees/Ea平均值非常一致。结论:对于筛选心力衰竭,使用无创血管刚度评估装置估计的Ees/Ea是可以接受的,并且需要进行四次连续测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Pilot Estimation of Ventricular-Arterial Coupling Using a Vascular Screening Device (VaSera®).

Background: Non-invasive cardiovascular assessment has become an alternative to invasive techniques. VaSera®, a vascular screening device, measures arterial stiffness with the cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI); it also measures cardiophysiological variables of ejection time (ET) and pre-ejection period (PEP). We aimed to apply the parameters obtained by VaSera® to estimate heart function based on left ventricular end-systolic elastance/arterial elastance (Ees/Ea) and to assess the minimal required number of measurements for estimation.

Methods: We conducted an experimental laboratory study for healthy volunteers. Using the previously established formula, the Ees/Ea value of each participant was estimated using ET and PEP values measured by VaSera®. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) assessed the minimum required number of measurements. Concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and Bland and Altman analysis assessed variation of Ees/Ea estimation against the trimmed average.

Results: A total of 660 measurements from 132 participants were included. The Ees/Ea estimates from the VaSera® were 1.5 [1.2, 1.9]. The ICC for Ees/Ea was 0.71 (95% confidence interval: 0.65-0.77), suggesting that four measurements were required. The CCC between the trimmed average of Ees/Ea and the mean of four Ees/Ea estimates was 0.99. Bland and Altman analysis showed excellent agreement for the mean of four Ees/Ea estimates and the trimmed average of Ees/Ea.

Conclusions: For screening of heart failure, the Ees/Ea estimated using non-invasive vascular-stiffness assessment device would be tolerable and four sequential measurements were required.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Nippon Medical School
Journal of Nippon Medical School MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: The international effort to understand, treat and control disease involve clinicians and researchers from many medical and biological science disciplines. The Journal of Nippon Medical School (JNMS) is the official journal of the Medical Association of Nippon Medical School and is dedicated to furthering international exchange of medical science experience and opinion. It provides an international forum for researchers in the fields of bascic and clinical medicine to introduce, discuss and exchange thier novel achievements in biomedical science and a platform for the worldwide dissemination and steering of biomedical knowledge for the benefit of human health and welfare. Properly reasoned discussions disciplined by appropriate references to existing bodies of knowledge or aimed at motivating the creation of such knowledge is the aim of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信