三种不同技术对分离文件检索后牙本质结构损失的评估:一项离体研究。

IF 1.6 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Mohamed Ashraf Abdeen, Gianluca Plotino, Ehab El-Sayed Hassanien, Mohammed Turky
{"title":"三种不同技术对分离文件检索后牙本质结构损失的评估:一项离体研究。","authors":"Mohamed Ashraf Abdeen,&nbsp;Gianluca Plotino,&nbsp;Ehab El-Sayed Hassanien,&nbsp;Mohammed Turky","doi":"10.14744/eej.2023.37929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the success rate of retrieving separated instrument, the root canal volume changes using cone-beam computed tomography and the retrieval time using Ruddle's technique, Terauchi file retrieval kit (TFRK) and Endo Rescue kit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty human mandibular first molars were selected, and a 4-mm portion of #25/.04 rotary files were separated in the middle third of moderately curved mesio-buccal canals. Teeth were randomly assigned into three groups (n=20): R group, in which separated files were retrieved according to Ruddle's technique; T group, in which separated files were retrieved using TFRK and E group, in which separated files were retrieved using Endo Rescue kit. Values were analyzed using IBM SPSS. Results presented as mean+-standard deviation and 95% confidence interval for the root canal volume and time and frequency (%) for success rate. Comparisons of differences in time, canal volume and success rate between groups were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Retrieval was successful in R and T groups (70% and 80% respectively) without any significant difference between them (p=0.715), while E group hadn't any successful samples (0.0%) with significant difference compared to R and T groups (p<0.001, p<0.001). E group showed the highest increase in canal volume followed by R group, while T group exhibited the lowest increase in canal volume. There was no significant difference in the mean retrieval time between R and T groups (p=0.815).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TFRK provides a more conservative way for retrieval of separated instrument from the middle third of moderately curved canals. (EEJ-2023-01-01).</p>","PeriodicalId":11860,"journal":{"name":"European Endodontic Journal","volume":"8 3","pages":"225-230"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3c/ec/EEJ-8-225.PMC10244914.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Dentine Structure Loss after Separated File Retrieval by Three Different Techniques: An Ex-vivo Study.\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Ashraf Abdeen,&nbsp;Gianluca Plotino,&nbsp;Ehab El-Sayed Hassanien,&nbsp;Mohammed Turky\",\"doi\":\"10.14744/eej.2023.37929\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the success rate of retrieving separated instrument, the root canal volume changes using cone-beam computed tomography and the retrieval time using Ruddle's technique, Terauchi file retrieval kit (TFRK) and Endo Rescue kit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty human mandibular first molars were selected, and a 4-mm portion of #25/.04 rotary files were separated in the middle third of moderately curved mesio-buccal canals. Teeth were randomly assigned into three groups (n=20): R group, in which separated files were retrieved according to Ruddle's technique; T group, in which separated files were retrieved using TFRK and E group, in which separated files were retrieved using Endo Rescue kit. Values were analyzed using IBM SPSS. Results presented as mean+-standard deviation and 95% confidence interval for the root canal volume and time and frequency (%) for success rate. Comparisons of differences in time, canal volume and success rate between groups were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Retrieval was successful in R and T groups (70% and 80% respectively) without any significant difference between them (p=0.715), while E group hadn't any successful samples (0.0%) with significant difference compared to R and T groups (p<0.001, p<0.001). E group showed the highest increase in canal volume followed by R group, while T group exhibited the lowest increase in canal volume. There was no significant difference in the mean retrieval time between R and T groups (p=0.815).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TFRK provides a more conservative way for retrieval of separated instrument from the middle third of moderately curved canals. (EEJ-2023-01-01).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Endodontic Journal\",\"volume\":\"8 3\",\"pages\":\"225-230\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3c/ec/EEJ-8-225.PMC10244914.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Endodontic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2023.37929\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2023.37929","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:评价锥形束计算机断层扫描分离器械、根管体积变化及Ruddle技术、Terauchi file retrieval kit (TFRK)和Endo Rescue kit (Endo Rescue kit)的检索成功率。方法:选择60颗人下颌第一磨牙,其中4 mm部分为#25/。在中度弯曲的中颊管中间三分之一处分离04个旋转锉。将牙齿随机分为3组(n=20): R组,根据Ruddle's技术检索分离档案;T组,使用TFRK检索分离文件;E组,使用Endo Rescue kit检索分离文件。采用IBM SPSS软件对数值进行分析。结果以根管体积的平均值+标准差和95%置信区间表示,成功率以时间和频率(%)表示。比较两组间时间、根管容积及成功率的差异。结果:R组和T组检索成功(分别为70%和80%),两组间差异无统计学意义(p=0.715),而E组无检索成功(0.0%),两组间差异有统计学意义(p=0.715)。结论:TFRK为中等弯曲管中三分之一分离器械检索提供了更为保守的方法。(eej - 2023 - 01 - 01)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluation of Dentine Structure Loss after Separated File Retrieval by Three Different Techniques: An Ex-vivo Study.

Evaluation of Dentine Structure Loss after Separated File Retrieval by Three Different Techniques: An Ex-vivo Study.

Evaluation of Dentine Structure Loss after Separated File Retrieval by Three Different Techniques: An Ex-vivo Study.

Evaluation of Dentine Structure Loss after Separated File Retrieval by Three Different Techniques: An Ex-vivo Study.

Objective: To evaluate the success rate of retrieving separated instrument, the root canal volume changes using cone-beam computed tomography and the retrieval time using Ruddle's technique, Terauchi file retrieval kit (TFRK) and Endo Rescue kit.

Methods: Sixty human mandibular first molars were selected, and a 4-mm portion of #25/.04 rotary files were separated in the middle third of moderately curved mesio-buccal canals. Teeth were randomly assigned into three groups (n=20): R group, in which separated files were retrieved according to Ruddle's technique; T group, in which separated files were retrieved using TFRK and E group, in which separated files were retrieved using Endo Rescue kit. Values were analyzed using IBM SPSS. Results presented as mean+-standard deviation and 95% confidence interval for the root canal volume and time and frequency (%) for success rate. Comparisons of differences in time, canal volume and success rate between groups were assessed.

Results: Retrieval was successful in R and T groups (70% and 80% respectively) without any significant difference between them (p=0.715), while E group hadn't any successful samples (0.0%) with significant difference compared to R and T groups (p<0.001, p<0.001). E group showed the highest increase in canal volume followed by R group, while T group exhibited the lowest increase in canal volume. There was no significant difference in the mean retrieval time between R and T groups (p=0.815).

Conclusion: TFRK provides a more conservative way for retrieval of separated instrument from the middle third of moderately curved canals. (EEJ-2023-01-01).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Endodontic Journal
European Endodontic Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.60%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信