{"title":"热处理镍钛仪器往复运动的动态循环疲劳抗力。","authors":"Thaís Kauana Magalhães Sobral, Lucila Piasecki, Flávia Sens Fagundes Tomazinho, Alison Luís Kirchhoff, Marilisa Carneiro Leão Gabardo, Natanael Henrique Ribeiro Mattos, Flares Baratto Filho, Luiz Fernando Fariniuk","doi":"10.14744/eej.2023.73792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the fatigue resistance of different heat-treated reciprocating instruments tested in a dynamic cyclic fatigue model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-eight new instruments were inspected under magnification and selected for this study, and then divided as follows (n=12): X1 Blue (MK Life, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil), Pro-R (MK Life), Reciproc (VDW, Munich, Germany), and Reciproc Blue (VDW). Artificial canals presenting a curvature of 60° angle and 5 mm radius were milled in zirconia. The block containing the artificial canals was mounted in a container filled with water kept at 37°C. A specially designed device was used to perform controlled axial movements while the instruments were activated inside the canals. Time to failure was recorded in seconds, and fragment lengths were measured (mm). Data were analyzed statistically with the significance level set at 5% (One-Way ANOVA and Tukey test).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pro-R and Reciproc Blue instruments presented the highest fatigue resistance, being significantly different from the other tested files (p<0.05). Reciproc presented intermediate results, significantly different X1 Blue (p<0.05). The fractographic analysis showed typical features of cyclic fatigue for all instruments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pro-R and Reciproc Blue instruments are more resistant to dynamic cyclic fatigue than the Reciproc and X1 Blue. (EEJ-2022-10-124).</p>","PeriodicalId":11860,"journal":{"name":"European Endodontic Journal","volume":"8 3","pages":"201-206"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d5/99/EEJ-8-201.PMC10244920.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dynamic Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Heat-treated Nickel Titanium Instruments in Reciprocating Motion.\",\"authors\":\"Thaís Kauana Magalhães Sobral, Lucila Piasecki, Flávia Sens Fagundes Tomazinho, Alison Luís Kirchhoff, Marilisa Carneiro Leão Gabardo, Natanael Henrique Ribeiro Mattos, Flares Baratto Filho, Luiz Fernando Fariniuk\",\"doi\":\"10.14744/eej.2023.73792\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the fatigue resistance of different heat-treated reciprocating instruments tested in a dynamic cyclic fatigue model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-eight new instruments were inspected under magnification and selected for this study, and then divided as follows (n=12): X1 Blue (MK Life, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil), Pro-R (MK Life), Reciproc (VDW, Munich, Germany), and Reciproc Blue (VDW). Artificial canals presenting a curvature of 60° angle and 5 mm radius were milled in zirconia. The block containing the artificial canals was mounted in a container filled with water kept at 37°C. A specially designed device was used to perform controlled axial movements while the instruments were activated inside the canals. Time to failure was recorded in seconds, and fragment lengths were measured (mm). Data were analyzed statistically with the significance level set at 5% (One-Way ANOVA and Tukey test).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pro-R and Reciproc Blue instruments presented the highest fatigue resistance, being significantly different from the other tested files (p<0.05). Reciproc presented intermediate results, significantly different X1 Blue (p<0.05). The fractographic analysis showed typical features of cyclic fatigue for all instruments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pro-R and Reciproc Blue instruments are more resistant to dynamic cyclic fatigue than the Reciproc and X1 Blue. (EEJ-2022-10-124).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Endodontic Journal\",\"volume\":\"8 3\",\"pages\":\"201-206\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d5/99/EEJ-8-201.PMC10244920.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Endodontic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2023.73792\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2023.73792","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:比较不同热处理往复装置在动态循环疲劳模型中的抗疲劳性能。方法:选择48台新仪器进行放大检查,并将其分为X1 Blue (MK Life, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil)、Pro-R (MK Life)、Reciproc (VDW, Munich, Germany)和Reciproc Blue (VDW) (n=12)。在氧化锆中研磨出曲率为60°角、半径为5mm的人工管。装有人工运河的石块被安装在一个装满37°C水的容器中。当器械在管内被激活时,一个特别设计的装置被用来进行受控的轴向运动。以秒为单位记录故障发生时间,并测量碎片长度(mm)。对数据进行统计学分析,显著性水平设为5%(单因素方差分析和Tukey检验)。结果:Pro-R和Reciproc Blue仪器的抗疲劳性能最高,与其他测试文件有显著差异(p)结论:Pro-R和Reciproc Blue仪器比Reciproc和X1 Blue更能抵抗动态循环疲劳。(eej - 2022 - 10 - 124)。
Dynamic Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Heat-treated Nickel Titanium Instruments in Reciprocating Motion.
Objective: To compare the fatigue resistance of different heat-treated reciprocating instruments tested in a dynamic cyclic fatigue model.
Methods: Forty-eight new instruments were inspected under magnification and selected for this study, and then divided as follows (n=12): X1 Blue (MK Life, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil), Pro-R (MK Life), Reciproc (VDW, Munich, Germany), and Reciproc Blue (VDW). Artificial canals presenting a curvature of 60° angle and 5 mm radius were milled in zirconia. The block containing the artificial canals was mounted in a container filled with water kept at 37°C. A specially designed device was used to perform controlled axial movements while the instruments were activated inside the canals. Time to failure was recorded in seconds, and fragment lengths were measured (mm). Data were analyzed statistically with the significance level set at 5% (One-Way ANOVA and Tukey test).
Results: Pro-R and Reciproc Blue instruments presented the highest fatigue resistance, being significantly different from the other tested files (p<0.05). Reciproc presented intermediate results, significantly different X1 Blue (p<0.05). The fractographic analysis showed typical features of cyclic fatigue for all instruments.
Conclusion: Pro-R and Reciproc Blue instruments are more resistant to dynamic cyclic fatigue than the Reciproc and X1 Blue. (EEJ-2022-10-124).