第6章)。生命伦理学和人类胚胎研究法律的修订:对生命伦理学一般状态的心理社会分析。

Eloïse Vinson, Thémis Apostolidis, Renata Lira Dos Santos Aléssio, Maria de Fátima De Souza Santos, Lionel Dany
{"title":"第6章)。生命伦理学和人类胚胎研究法律的修订:对生命伦理学一般状态的心理社会分析。","authors":"Eloïse Vinson,&nbsp;Thémis Apostolidis,&nbsp;Renata Lira Dos Santos Aléssio,&nbsp;Maria de Fátima De Souza Santos,&nbsp;Lionel Dany","doi":"10.3917/jibes.333.0075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bioethics are widely used in the course of biomedical science&#8217;s evolution. It allows to question ethical aspects underlying the setting of new research and clinical intervention techniques. This ethical thinking reflects norms and values socially admitted and question the way new scientific information are integrated to individuals&#8217; system of knowing. Human embryo research, subject to bioethics laws revisions, represents an almost prototypical object of these issues, both lay and scientific. This study aims to study these issues through the context of bioethics revision laws, from users&#8217; comments on Estates-General of Bioethics website, using the social representations theorical frame. A thematic content analysis has been performed. Results shows that embryo status is a structural argument of the debate, and that the opinion on human embryo research results from a set of ethical concerns that come from socially anchored values, accounting for the way individuals define science, biotechnologies and research on the living, that we also find in the bioethics legislation.</p>","PeriodicalId":73577,"journal":{"name":"Journal international de bioethique et d'ethique des sciences","volume":"33 3","pages":"75-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chapitre 6. Révisions des lois de bioéthique et recherche sur l’embryon humain : une analyse psychosociale des États Généraux de la Bioéthique.\",\"authors\":\"Eloïse Vinson,&nbsp;Thémis Apostolidis,&nbsp;Renata Lira Dos Santos Aléssio,&nbsp;Maria de Fátima De Souza Santos,&nbsp;Lionel Dany\",\"doi\":\"10.3917/jibes.333.0075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Bioethics are widely used in the course of biomedical science&#8217;s evolution. It allows to question ethical aspects underlying the setting of new research and clinical intervention techniques. This ethical thinking reflects norms and values socially admitted and question the way new scientific information are integrated to individuals&#8217; system of knowing. Human embryo research, subject to bioethics laws revisions, represents an almost prototypical object of these issues, both lay and scientific. This study aims to study these issues through the context of bioethics revision laws, from users&#8217; comments on Estates-General of Bioethics website, using the social representations theorical frame. A thematic content analysis has been performed. Results shows that embryo status is a structural argument of the debate, and that the opinion on human embryo research results from a set of ethical concerns that come from socially anchored values, accounting for the way individuals define science, biotechnologies and research on the living, that we also find in the bioethics legislation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal international de bioethique et d'ethique des sciences\",\"volume\":\"33 3\",\"pages\":\"75-93\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal international de bioethique et d'ethique des sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3917/jibes.333.0075\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal international de bioethique et d'ethique des sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/jibes.333.0075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生命伦理学在生物医学的发展过程中得到了广泛的应用。它允许对新研究和临床干预技术设置的伦理方面提出质疑。这种伦理思维反映了社会公认的规范和价值观,并质疑新的科学信息融入个人的方式。认识系统。人类胚胎研究,受制于生物伦理法律的修订,代表了这些问题的一个几乎原型的对象,无论是世俗的还是科学的。本研究旨在通过生物伦理修订法律的背景来研究这些问题,从用户’运用社会表征理论框架对生物伦理三级委员会网站进行评价。进行了专题内容分析。结果表明,胚胎状态是辩论的一个结构性论点,对人类胚胎研究的看法源于一系列来自社会锚定价值观的伦理问题,考虑到个人定义科学、生物技术和对生命的研究的方式,我们也在生物伦理立法中发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Chapitre 6. Révisions des lois de bioéthique et recherche sur l’embryon humain : une analyse psychosociale des États Généraux de la Bioéthique.

Bioethics are widely used in the course of biomedical science’s evolution. It allows to question ethical aspects underlying the setting of new research and clinical intervention techniques. This ethical thinking reflects norms and values socially admitted and question the way new scientific information are integrated to individuals’ system of knowing. Human embryo research, subject to bioethics laws revisions, represents an almost prototypical object of these issues, both lay and scientific. This study aims to study these issues through the context of bioethics revision laws, from users’ comments on Estates-General of Bioethics website, using the social representations theorical frame. A thematic content analysis has been performed. Results shows that embryo status is a structural argument of the debate, and that the opinion on human embryo research results from a set of ethical concerns that come from socially anchored values, accounting for the way individuals define science, biotechnologies and research on the living, that we also find in the bioethics legislation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信