自我同情量表-简短形式:一个非临床和两个临床瑞典样本的心理测量评估

IF 3.2 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Sven Alfonsson, Ebba Winai, Emelie Collin, Martina Isaksson, Martina Wolf-Arehult
{"title":"自我同情量表-简短形式:一个非临床和两个临床瑞典样本的心理测量评估","authors":"Sven Alfonsson,&nbsp;Ebba Winai,&nbsp;Emelie Collin,&nbsp;Martina Isaksson,&nbsp;Martina Wolf-Arehult","doi":"10.1002/cpp.2830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Self-compassion has been defined as the ability to be with one's feelings of suffering in a warm and caring way. Research has shown a negative association between self-compassion and mental illness, and that low self-compassion can make psychotherapeutic effects less likely. The ability to measure a patient's self-compassion in a fast and reliable way is therefore important in investigating effects of psychotherapies. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the Self-Compassion Scale–Short Form (SCS-SF) in both non-clinical (NC) and clinical samples.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Cross-sectional data were gathered in a NC community sample (<i>n</i> = 1,089), an eating disorder (ED) sample (<i>n</i> = 253) and a borderline personality disorder (BPD) sample (<i>n</i> = 151). All participants were asked to complete a number of questionnaires, including the SCS-SF, and 121 participants in the NC sample repeated the assessment after 2 weeks for test–retest analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Confirmatory factor analyses supported the first-order model suggested in previous research. Good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.78–0.87) and test–retest reliability (intra-class correlation = 0.84) were demonstrated for the entire scale. Results also showed good convergent validity, demonstrating moderate negative associations between self-compassion and mental illnesses, as expected, and acceptable divergent validity, demonstrating weak positive associations between self-compassion and quality of life and mindfulness.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>The correlations between the SCS-SF and the instruments used for validation were weaker in the clinical samples than the NC sample. This may be due to difficulties measuring these constructs or that the associations differ somewhat between different populations, which could warrant further research. The results added some support to the assumption that self-compassion may overlap with mindfulness yet still represents a distinct construct.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Analyses of the SCS-SF provided evidence of adequate to good psychometric properties, supporting use of the scale's total sum score and a first-order factor structure. This is in accordance with previous evaluations of the SCS-SF, suggesting that it is a reliable and time-efficient instrument for measuring a general level of self-compassion. This may be important when evaluating psychotherapy and investigating self-compassion and its influence on psychiatric illness.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"30 3","pages":"631-642"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpp.2830","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Self-Compassion Scale–Short Form: Psychometric evaluation in one non-clinical and two clinical Swedish samples\",\"authors\":\"Sven Alfonsson,&nbsp;Ebba Winai,&nbsp;Emelie Collin,&nbsp;Martina Isaksson,&nbsp;Martina Wolf-Arehult\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cpp.2830\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Self-compassion has been defined as the ability to be with one's feelings of suffering in a warm and caring way. Research has shown a negative association between self-compassion and mental illness, and that low self-compassion can make psychotherapeutic effects less likely. The ability to measure a patient's self-compassion in a fast and reliable way is therefore important in investigating effects of psychotherapies. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the Self-Compassion Scale–Short Form (SCS-SF) in both non-clinical (NC) and clinical samples.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Cross-sectional data were gathered in a NC community sample (<i>n</i> = 1,089), an eating disorder (ED) sample (<i>n</i> = 253) and a borderline personality disorder (BPD) sample (<i>n</i> = 151). All participants were asked to complete a number of questionnaires, including the SCS-SF, and 121 participants in the NC sample repeated the assessment after 2 weeks for test–retest analysis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Confirmatory factor analyses supported the first-order model suggested in previous research. Good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.78–0.87) and test–retest reliability (intra-class correlation = 0.84) were demonstrated for the entire scale. Results also showed good convergent validity, demonstrating moderate negative associations between self-compassion and mental illnesses, as expected, and acceptable divergent validity, demonstrating weak positive associations between self-compassion and quality of life and mindfulness.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The correlations between the SCS-SF and the instruments used for validation were weaker in the clinical samples than the NC sample. This may be due to difficulties measuring these constructs or that the associations differ somewhat between different populations, which could warrant further research. The results added some support to the assumption that self-compassion may overlap with mindfulness yet still represents a distinct construct.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Analyses of the SCS-SF provided evidence of adequate to good psychometric properties, supporting use of the scale's total sum score and a first-order factor structure. This is in accordance with previous evaluations of the SCS-SF, suggesting that it is a reliable and time-efficient instrument for measuring a general level of self-compassion. This may be important when evaluating psychotherapy and investigating self-compassion and its influence on psychiatric illness.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy\",\"volume\":\"30 3\",\"pages\":\"631-642\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpp.2830\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.2830\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.2830","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自我同情被定义为一种以温暖和关怀的方式对待自己痛苦感受的能力。研究表明,自我同情与精神疾病之间存在负相关关系,而缺乏自我同情会降低心理治疗效果的可能性。因此,在研究心理治疗的效果时,以一种快速可靠的方式测量病人自我同情的能力是很重要的。本研究的目的是评估瑞典版自我同情量表-短表(SCS-SF)在非临床和临床样本中的心理测量特性。方法收集NC社区样本(n = 1089)、饮食障碍(n = 253)和边缘型人格障碍(n = 151)的横断面数据。所有参与者都被要求完成一系列问卷,包括SCS-SF, NC样本中的121名参与者在2周后重复评估进行重测分析。结果验证性因子分析支持先前研究提出的一阶模型。整个量表具有良好的内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha = 0.78-0.87)和重测信度(类内相关= 0.84)。结果也显示出良好的收敛效度,如预期的那样显示出自我同情与精神疾病之间的中度负相关;可接受的发散效度,显示出自我同情与生活质量和正念之间的弱正相关。在临床样品中,SCS-SF与用于验证的仪器之间的相关性比NC样品弱。这可能是由于难以测量这些结构,或者不同人群之间的关联有所不同,这可能需要进一步的研究。研究结果为以下假设提供了一些支持:自我同情可能与正念重叠,但仍然代表着一种不同的结构。结论对量表的分析提供了足够或良好的心理测量特性的证据,支持使用量表的总得分和一阶因子结构。这与先前对自我同情量表的评价一致,表明它是一种可靠且省时的测量自我同情总体水平的工具。这在评估心理治疗和调查自我同情及其对精神疾病的影响时可能很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Self-Compassion Scale–Short Form: Psychometric evaluation in one non-clinical and two clinical Swedish samples

The Self-Compassion Scale–Short Form: Psychometric evaluation in one non-clinical and two clinical Swedish samples

Background

Self-compassion has been defined as the ability to be with one's feelings of suffering in a warm and caring way. Research has shown a negative association between self-compassion and mental illness, and that low self-compassion can make psychotherapeutic effects less likely. The ability to measure a patient's self-compassion in a fast and reliable way is therefore important in investigating effects of psychotherapies. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the Self-Compassion Scale–Short Form (SCS-SF) in both non-clinical (NC) and clinical samples.

Methods

Cross-sectional data were gathered in a NC community sample (n = 1,089), an eating disorder (ED) sample (n = 253) and a borderline personality disorder (BPD) sample (n = 151). All participants were asked to complete a number of questionnaires, including the SCS-SF, and 121 participants in the NC sample repeated the assessment after 2 weeks for test–retest analysis.

Results

Confirmatory factor analyses supported the first-order model suggested in previous research. Good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.78–0.87) and test–retest reliability (intra-class correlation = 0.84) were demonstrated for the entire scale. Results also showed good convergent validity, demonstrating moderate negative associations between self-compassion and mental illnesses, as expected, and acceptable divergent validity, demonstrating weak positive associations between self-compassion and quality of life and mindfulness.

Discussion

The correlations between the SCS-SF and the instruments used for validation were weaker in the clinical samples than the NC sample. This may be due to difficulties measuring these constructs or that the associations differ somewhat between different populations, which could warrant further research. The results added some support to the assumption that self-compassion may overlap with mindfulness yet still represents a distinct construct.

Conclusions

Analyses of the SCS-SF provided evidence of adequate to good psychometric properties, supporting use of the scale's total sum score and a first-order factor structure. This is in accordance with previous evaluations of the SCS-SF, suggesting that it is a reliable and time-efficient instrument for measuring a general level of self-compassion. This may be important when evaluating psychotherapy and investigating self-compassion and its influence on psychiatric illness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy aims to keep clinical psychologists and psychotherapists up to date with new developments in their fields. The Journal will provide an integrative impetus both between theory and practice and between different orientations within clinical psychology and psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy will be a forum in which practitioners can present their wealth of expertise and innovations in order to make these available to a wider audience. Equally, the Journal will contain reports from researchers who want to address a larger clinical audience with clinically relevant issues and clinically valid research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信