通过睡眠解决癌症相关的疲劳:一项比较针灸和认知行为疗法治疗失眠的随机试验的二次分析

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Xiaotong Li , Kevin T. Liou , Susan Chimonas , Karolina Bryl , Greta Wong , Eugenie Spiguel , Susan Q. Li , Sheila N. Garland , Ting Bao , Jun J. Mao
{"title":"通过睡眠解决癌症相关的疲劳:一项比较针灸和认知行为疗法治疗失眠的随机试验的二次分析","authors":"Xiaotong Li ,&nbsp;Kevin T. Liou ,&nbsp;Susan Chimonas ,&nbsp;Karolina Bryl ,&nbsp;Greta Wong ,&nbsp;Eugenie Spiguel ,&nbsp;Susan Q. Li ,&nbsp;Sheila N. Garland ,&nbsp;Ting Bao ,&nbsp;Jun J. Mao","doi":"10.1016/j.imr.2023.100922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Fatigue is a troublesome symptom in cancer survivors that often results from disrupted sleep. We sought to assess whether two insomnia-focused non-pharmacological interventions are also effective for improving fatigue.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We analyzed data from a randomized clinical trial comparing cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) versus acupuncture for insomnia among cancer survivors. Participants were 109 patients who reported insomnia and moderate or worse fatigue. Interventions were delivered over eight weeks. Fatigue was evaluated at baseline, week 8, and week 20 using the Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory-Short Form (MFSI-SF). We used both mediation analysis and t-tests to explore the extent to which fatigue reduction was attributable to insomnia response.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Compared to baseline, both CBT-I and acupuncture produced significant reductions in total MFSI-SF scores at week 8 (−17.1 points; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −21.1 to −13.1, and −13.2 points; 95% CI: -17.2 to -9.2, respectively, all <em>p</em>&lt;0.001) and week 20 (-14.6 points; 95% CI: -18.6 to -10.6, and −14.2 points; 95% CI: -18.1 to -10.3. respectively, all <em>p</em>&lt;0.001), with no significant between-group differences. MFSI-SF total scores at week 8 were significantly associated with sleep improvements in both CBT-I and acupuncture groups (<em>p</em>&lt;0.001 and <em>p</em>=0.011, respectively). Insomnia responders demonstrated significantly greater improvements in mean MFSI-SF total scores compared with non-responders in the CBT-I group (<em>p</em>=0.016) but not in the acupuncture group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>CBT-I and acupuncture produced similar, clinically meaningful, and durable fatigue reductions in cancer survivors with insomnia, primarily through improvements in sleep. Acupuncture may also reduce fatigue through additional pathways.</p></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><p>ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02356575</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13644,"journal":{"name":"Integrative Medicine Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0d/cf/main.PMC9944506.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addressing cancer-related fatigue through sleep: A secondary analysis of a randomized trial comparing acupuncture and cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia\",\"authors\":\"Xiaotong Li ,&nbsp;Kevin T. Liou ,&nbsp;Susan Chimonas ,&nbsp;Karolina Bryl ,&nbsp;Greta Wong ,&nbsp;Eugenie Spiguel ,&nbsp;Susan Q. Li ,&nbsp;Sheila N. Garland ,&nbsp;Ting Bao ,&nbsp;Jun J. Mao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.imr.2023.100922\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Fatigue is a troublesome symptom in cancer survivors that often results from disrupted sleep. We sought to assess whether two insomnia-focused non-pharmacological interventions are also effective for improving fatigue.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We analyzed data from a randomized clinical trial comparing cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) versus acupuncture for insomnia among cancer survivors. Participants were 109 patients who reported insomnia and moderate or worse fatigue. Interventions were delivered over eight weeks. Fatigue was evaluated at baseline, week 8, and week 20 using the Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory-Short Form (MFSI-SF). We used both mediation analysis and t-tests to explore the extent to which fatigue reduction was attributable to insomnia response.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Compared to baseline, both CBT-I and acupuncture produced significant reductions in total MFSI-SF scores at week 8 (−17.1 points; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −21.1 to −13.1, and −13.2 points; 95% CI: -17.2 to -9.2, respectively, all <em>p</em>&lt;0.001) and week 20 (-14.6 points; 95% CI: -18.6 to -10.6, and −14.2 points; 95% CI: -18.1 to -10.3. respectively, all <em>p</em>&lt;0.001), with no significant between-group differences. MFSI-SF total scores at week 8 were significantly associated with sleep improvements in both CBT-I and acupuncture groups (<em>p</em>&lt;0.001 and <em>p</em>=0.011, respectively). Insomnia responders demonstrated significantly greater improvements in mean MFSI-SF total scores compared with non-responders in the CBT-I group (<em>p</em>=0.016) but not in the acupuncture group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>CBT-I and acupuncture produced similar, clinically meaningful, and durable fatigue reductions in cancer survivors with insomnia, primarily through improvements in sleep. Acupuncture may also reduce fatigue through additional pathways.</p></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><p>ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02356575</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Integrative Medicine Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0d/cf/main.PMC9944506.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Integrative Medicine Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213422023000021\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrative Medicine Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213422023000021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景疲劳是癌症幸存者的一个麻烦症状,通常是由睡眠中断引起的。我们试图评估两种以失眠为重点的非药物干预措施是否也能有效改善疲劳。方法我们分析了癌症幸存者失眠认知行为疗法(CBT-I)与针灸治疗失眠的随机临床试验数据。参与者是109名报告失眠和中度或更严重疲劳的患者。干预措施在八周内实施。在基线、第8周和第20周使用多维疲劳症状清单简表(MFSI-SF)评估疲劳。我们使用中介分析和t检验来探讨失眠反应导致疲劳减轻的程度。结果与基线相比,CBT-I和针灸在第8周(−17.1分;95%置信区间[CI]:−21.1至−13.1和−13.2分;95%CI:-17.2至-9.2,分别为p<0.001)和第20周(-14.6分;95%CI:-18.6至-10.6和−14.2分;95%CI:18.1至-10.3)的MFSI-SF总分均显著降低。所有p<;0.001),组间无显著差异。CBT-I组和针灸组在第8周的MFSI-SF总分均与睡眠改善显著相关(分别为p<0.001和p=0.011)。与CBT-I组的无应答者相比,失眠应答者的平均MFSI-SF总分有更大的改善(p=0.016),但针灸组没有。结论CBT-I和针灸在癌症失眠幸存者中产生了类似的、有临床意义的、持久的疲劳减轻,主要是通过改善睡眠。针灸还可以通过其他途径减轻疲劳。试验注册ClinicalTrials.gov,标识符:NCT02356575
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Addressing cancer-related fatigue through sleep: A secondary analysis of a randomized trial comparing acupuncture and cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia

Addressing cancer-related fatigue through sleep: A secondary analysis of a randomized trial comparing acupuncture and cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia

Addressing cancer-related fatigue through sleep: A secondary analysis of a randomized trial comparing acupuncture and cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia

Addressing cancer-related fatigue through sleep: A secondary analysis of a randomized trial comparing acupuncture and cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia

Background

Fatigue is a troublesome symptom in cancer survivors that often results from disrupted sleep. We sought to assess whether two insomnia-focused non-pharmacological interventions are also effective for improving fatigue.

Methods

We analyzed data from a randomized clinical trial comparing cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) versus acupuncture for insomnia among cancer survivors. Participants were 109 patients who reported insomnia and moderate or worse fatigue. Interventions were delivered over eight weeks. Fatigue was evaluated at baseline, week 8, and week 20 using the Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory-Short Form (MFSI-SF). We used both mediation analysis and t-tests to explore the extent to which fatigue reduction was attributable to insomnia response.

Results

Compared to baseline, both CBT-I and acupuncture produced significant reductions in total MFSI-SF scores at week 8 (−17.1 points; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −21.1 to −13.1, and −13.2 points; 95% CI: -17.2 to -9.2, respectively, all p<0.001) and week 20 (-14.6 points; 95% CI: -18.6 to -10.6, and −14.2 points; 95% CI: -18.1 to -10.3. respectively, all p<0.001), with no significant between-group differences. MFSI-SF total scores at week 8 were significantly associated with sleep improvements in both CBT-I and acupuncture groups (p<0.001 and p=0.011, respectively). Insomnia responders demonstrated significantly greater improvements in mean MFSI-SF total scores compared with non-responders in the CBT-I group (p=0.016) but not in the acupuncture group.

Conclusion

CBT-I and acupuncture produced similar, clinically meaningful, and durable fatigue reductions in cancer survivors with insomnia, primarily through improvements in sleep. Acupuncture may also reduce fatigue through additional pathways.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02356575

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Integrative Medicine Research
Integrative Medicine Research Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
65
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Integrative Medicine Research (IMR) is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal focused on scientific research for integrative medicine including traditional medicine (emphasis on acupuncture and herbal medicine), complementary and alternative medicine, and systems medicine. The journal includes papers on basic research, clinical research, methodology, theory, computational analysis and modelling, topical reviews, medical history, education and policy based on physiology, pathology, diagnosis and the systems approach in the field of integrative medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信