验证乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)作为PLASMIC预测工具(PLASMIC-LDH)的一个组成部分。

IF 2.3 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Christopher Chin Keong Liam, Jim Yu-Hsiang Tiao, Yee Yee Yap, Yi Lin Lee, Jameela Sathar, Simon McRae, Amanda Davis, Jennifer Curnow, Robert Bird, Philip Choi, Pantep Angchaisuksiri, Sim Leng Tien, Joyce Ching Mei Lam, Doyeun Oh, Jin Seok Kim, Sung-Soo Yoon, Raymond Siu-Ming Wong, Carolyn Lauren, Eileen Grace Merriman, Anoop Enjeti, Mark Smith, Ross Ian Baker
{"title":"验证乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)作为PLASMIC预测工具(PLASMIC-LDH)的一个组成部分。","authors":"Christopher Chin Keong Liam,&nbsp;Jim Yu-Hsiang Tiao,&nbsp;Yee Yee Yap,&nbsp;Yi Lin Lee,&nbsp;Jameela Sathar,&nbsp;Simon McRae,&nbsp;Amanda Davis,&nbsp;Jennifer Curnow,&nbsp;Robert Bird,&nbsp;Philip Choi,&nbsp;Pantep Angchaisuksiri,&nbsp;Sim Leng Tien,&nbsp;Joyce Ching Mei Lam,&nbsp;Doyeun Oh,&nbsp;Jin Seok Kim,&nbsp;Sung-Soo Yoon,&nbsp;Raymond Siu-Ming Wong,&nbsp;Carolyn Lauren,&nbsp;Eileen Grace Merriman,&nbsp;Anoop Enjeti,&nbsp;Mark Smith,&nbsp;Ross Ian Baker","doi":"10.5045/br.2023.2022133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The PLASMIC score is a convenient tool for predicting ADAMTS13 activity of <10%. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) is widely used as a marker of haemolysis in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) monitoring, and could be used as a replacement marker for lysis. We aimed to validate the PLASMIC score in a multi-centre Asia Pacific region, and to explore whether LDH could be used as a replacement marker for lysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Records of patients with thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) were reviewed. Patients' ADAMTS13 activity levels were obtained, along with clinical/laboratory findings relevant to the PLASMIC score. Both PLASMIC scores and PLASMIC-LDH scores, in which LDH replaced traditional lysis markers, were calculated. We generated a receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curve and compared the area under the curve values (AUC) to determine the predictive ability of each score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>46 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, of which 34 had ADAMTS13 activity levels of <10%. When the patients were divided into intermediate-to-high risk (scores 5‒7) and low risk (scores 0‒4), the PLASMIC score showed a sensitivity of 97.1% and specificity of 58.3%, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 86.8% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 87.5%. The PLASMIC-LDH score had a sensitivity of 97.1% and specificity of 33.3%, with a PPV of 80.5% and NPV of 80.0%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study validated the utility of the PLASMIC score, and demonstrated PLASMIC-LDH as a reasonable alternative in the absence of traditional lysis markers, to help identify high-risk patients for treatment via plasma exchange.</p>","PeriodicalId":46224,"journal":{"name":"Blood Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fb/e3/br-58-1-36.PMC10063598.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validating lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) as a component of the PLASMIC predictive tool (PLASMIC-LDH).\",\"authors\":\"Christopher Chin Keong Liam,&nbsp;Jim Yu-Hsiang Tiao,&nbsp;Yee Yee Yap,&nbsp;Yi Lin Lee,&nbsp;Jameela Sathar,&nbsp;Simon McRae,&nbsp;Amanda Davis,&nbsp;Jennifer Curnow,&nbsp;Robert Bird,&nbsp;Philip Choi,&nbsp;Pantep Angchaisuksiri,&nbsp;Sim Leng Tien,&nbsp;Joyce Ching Mei Lam,&nbsp;Doyeun Oh,&nbsp;Jin Seok Kim,&nbsp;Sung-Soo Yoon,&nbsp;Raymond Siu-Ming Wong,&nbsp;Carolyn Lauren,&nbsp;Eileen Grace Merriman,&nbsp;Anoop Enjeti,&nbsp;Mark Smith,&nbsp;Ross Ian Baker\",\"doi\":\"10.5045/br.2023.2022133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The PLASMIC score is a convenient tool for predicting ADAMTS13 activity of <10%. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) is widely used as a marker of haemolysis in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) monitoring, and could be used as a replacement marker for lysis. We aimed to validate the PLASMIC score in a multi-centre Asia Pacific region, and to explore whether LDH could be used as a replacement marker for lysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Records of patients with thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) were reviewed. Patients' ADAMTS13 activity levels were obtained, along with clinical/laboratory findings relevant to the PLASMIC score. Both PLASMIC scores and PLASMIC-LDH scores, in which LDH replaced traditional lysis markers, were calculated. We generated a receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curve and compared the area under the curve values (AUC) to determine the predictive ability of each score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>46 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, of which 34 had ADAMTS13 activity levels of <10%. When the patients were divided into intermediate-to-high risk (scores 5‒7) and low risk (scores 0‒4), the PLASMIC score showed a sensitivity of 97.1% and specificity of 58.3%, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 86.8% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 87.5%. The PLASMIC-LDH score had a sensitivity of 97.1% and specificity of 33.3%, with a PPV of 80.5% and NPV of 80.0%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study validated the utility of the PLASMIC score, and demonstrated PLASMIC-LDH as a reasonable alternative in the absence of traditional lysis markers, to help identify high-risk patients for treatment via plasma exchange.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fb/e3/br-58-1-36.PMC10063598.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2023.2022133\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2023.2022133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:PLASMIC评分是预测血栓性微血管病(TMA)患者ADAMTS13活性的便捷工具。获得患者ADAMTS13活动水平,以及与PLASMIC评分相关的临床/实验室结果。计算了PLASMIC评分和PLASMIC-LDH评分,其中LDH取代了传统的裂解标记。我们生成了一个接收者算子特征(ROC)曲线,并比较曲线下的面积值(AUC),以确定每个分数的预测能力。结果:46例患者符合纳入标准,其中34例达到ADAMTS13活性水平。结论:我们的研究验证了PLASMIC评分的实用性,并证明了PLASMIC- ldh在缺乏传统溶解标志物的情况下是一种合理的替代方法,有助于识别通过血浆置换治疗的高危患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validating lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) as a component of the PLASMIC predictive tool (PLASMIC-LDH).

Background: The PLASMIC score is a convenient tool for predicting ADAMTS13 activity of <10%. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) is widely used as a marker of haemolysis in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) monitoring, and could be used as a replacement marker for lysis. We aimed to validate the PLASMIC score in a multi-centre Asia Pacific region, and to explore whether LDH could be used as a replacement marker for lysis.

Methods: Records of patients with thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) were reviewed. Patients' ADAMTS13 activity levels were obtained, along with clinical/laboratory findings relevant to the PLASMIC score. Both PLASMIC scores and PLASMIC-LDH scores, in which LDH replaced traditional lysis markers, were calculated. We generated a receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curve and compared the area under the curve values (AUC) to determine the predictive ability of each score.

Results: 46 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, of which 34 had ADAMTS13 activity levels of <10%. When the patients were divided into intermediate-to-high risk (scores 5‒7) and low risk (scores 0‒4), the PLASMIC score showed a sensitivity of 97.1% and specificity of 58.3%, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 86.8% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 87.5%. The PLASMIC-LDH score had a sensitivity of 97.1% and specificity of 33.3%, with a PPV of 80.5% and NPV of 80.0%.

Conclusion: Our study validated the utility of the PLASMIC score, and demonstrated PLASMIC-LDH as a reasonable alternative in the absence of traditional lysis markers, to help identify high-risk patients for treatment via plasma exchange.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Blood Research
Blood Research HEMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信