生物质燃烧羽流中Cairpol和Aeroqual空气传感器的评价。

IF 2.5 4区 地球科学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Atmosphere Pub Date : 2022-05-28 DOI:10.3390/atmos13060877
Andrew R Whitehill, Russell W Long, Shawn Urbanski, Maribel Colón, Bruce Habel, Matthew S Landis
{"title":"生物质燃烧羽流中Cairpol和Aeroqual空气传感器的评价。","authors":"Andrew R Whitehill,&nbsp;Russell W Long,&nbsp;Shawn Urbanski,&nbsp;Maribel Colón,&nbsp;Bruce Habel,&nbsp;Matthew S Landis","doi":"10.3390/atmos13060877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cairpol and Aeroqual air quality sensors measuring CO, CO<sub>2</sub>, NO<sub>2</sub>, and other species were tested in fresh biomass burning plumes in field and laboratory environments. We evaluated sensors by comparing 1-minute sensor measurements to collocated reference instrument measurements. Sensors were evaluated based on the coefficient of determination (<i>r</i> <sup>2</sup>) between the sensor and reference measurements, by the accuracy, collocated precision, root mean square error (RMSE), and other metrics. In general, CO and CO<sub>2</sub> sensors performed well (in terms of accuracy and <i>r</i> <sup>2</sup> values) compared to NO<sub>2</sub> sensors. Cairpol CO and NO<sub>2</sub> sensors had better sensor-versus-sensor agreement (e.g., collocated precision) than Aeroqual CO and NO<sub>2</sub> sensors of the same species. Tests of other sensors (e.g., NH<sub>3</sub>, H<sub>2</sub>S, VOC, NMHC) provided more inconsistent results and need further study. Aeroqual NO<sub>2</sub> sensors had an apparent O<sub>3</sub> interference that was not observed in the Cairpol NO<sub>2</sub> sensors. Although the sensor accuracy lags that of reference-level monitors, with location-specific calibrations they have the potential to provide useful data about community air quality and personal exposure to smoke impacts.</p>","PeriodicalId":8580,"journal":{"name":"Atmosphere","volume":"13 6","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10013706/pdf/nihms-1873147.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Cairpol and Aeroqual Air Sensors in Biomass Burning Plumes.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew R Whitehill,&nbsp;Russell W Long,&nbsp;Shawn Urbanski,&nbsp;Maribel Colón,&nbsp;Bruce Habel,&nbsp;Matthew S Landis\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/atmos13060877\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cairpol and Aeroqual air quality sensors measuring CO, CO<sub>2</sub>, NO<sub>2</sub>, and other species were tested in fresh biomass burning plumes in field and laboratory environments. We evaluated sensors by comparing 1-minute sensor measurements to collocated reference instrument measurements. Sensors were evaluated based on the coefficient of determination (<i>r</i> <sup>2</sup>) between the sensor and reference measurements, by the accuracy, collocated precision, root mean square error (RMSE), and other metrics. In general, CO and CO<sub>2</sub> sensors performed well (in terms of accuracy and <i>r</i> <sup>2</sup> values) compared to NO<sub>2</sub> sensors. Cairpol CO and NO<sub>2</sub> sensors had better sensor-versus-sensor agreement (e.g., collocated precision) than Aeroqual CO and NO<sub>2</sub> sensors of the same species. Tests of other sensors (e.g., NH<sub>3</sub>, H<sub>2</sub>S, VOC, NMHC) provided more inconsistent results and need further study. Aeroqual NO<sub>2</sub> sensors had an apparent O<sub>3</sub> interference that was not observed in the Cairpol NO<sub>2</sub> sensors. Although the sensor accuracy lags that of reference-level monitors, with location-specific calibrations they have the potential to provide useful data about community air quality and personal exposure to smoke impacts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Atmosphere\",\"volume\":\"13 6\",\"pages\":\"1-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10013706/pdf/nihms-1873147.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Atmosphere\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13060877\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmosphere","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13060877","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

Cairpol和Aeroqual空气质量传感器测量CO、CO2、NO2和其他物种,在野外和实验室环境中对新鲜生物质燃烧羽流进行了测试。我们通过比较1分钟传感器测量值和配置参考仪器测量值来评估传感器。根据传感器与参考测量值之间的决定系数(r2)、准确度、配准精度、均方根误差(RMSE)和其他指标对传感器进行评估。总的来说,与NO2传感器相比,CO和CO2传感器(在精度和r2值方面)表现良好。Cairpol CO和NO2传感器比Aeroqual CO和NO2传感器具有更好的传感器对传感器的一致性(例如,配置精度)。其他传感器(如NH3、H2S、VOC、NMHC)的测试结果不一致,需要进一步研究。Aeroqual NO2传感器有明显的O3干扰,这在Cairpol NO2传感器中没有观察到。虽然传感器的精度落后于参考级监测器,但通过特定地点的校准,它们有可能提供有关社区空气质量和个人暴露于烟雾影响的有用数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluation of Cairpol and Aeroqual Air Sensors in Biomass Burning Plumes.

Evaluation of Cairpol and Aeroqual Air Sensors in Biomass Burning Plumes.

Evaluation of Cairpol and Aeroqual Air Sensors in Biomass Burning Plumes.

Cairpol and Aeroqual air quality sensors measuring CO, CO2, NO2, and other species were tested in fresh biomass burning plumes in field and laboratory environments. We evaluated sensors by comparing 1-minute sensor measurements to collocated reference instrument measurements. Sensors were evaluated based on the coefficient of determination (r 2) between the sensor and reference measurements, by the accuracy, collocated precision, root mean square error (RMSE), and other metrics. In general, CO and CO2 sensors performed well (in terms of accuracy and r 2 values) compared to NO2 sensors. Cairpol CO and NO2 sensors had better sensor-versus-sensor agreement (e.g., collocated precision) than Aeroqual CO and NO2 sensors of the same species. Tests of other sensors (e.g., NH3, H2S, VOC, NMHC) provided more inconsistent results and need further study. Aeroqual NO2 sensors had an apparent O3 interference that was not observed in the Cairpol NO2 sensors. Although the sensor accuracy lags that of reference-level monitors, with location-specific calibrations they have the potential to provide useful data about community air quality and personal exposure to smoke impacts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Atmosphere
Atmosphere METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.80%
发文量
1769
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Atmosphere (ISSN 2073-4433) is an international and cross-disciplinary scholarly journal of scientific studies related to the atmosphere. It publishes reviews, regular research papers, communications and short notes, and there is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodical details must be provided for research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信