州外的绿色政治:激发气候公民大会的民主潜力。

IF 4.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Climatic Change Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-30 DOI:10.1007/s10584-023-03550-z
Mads Ejsing, Adam Veng, Irina Papazu
{"title":"州外的绿色政治:激发气候公民大会的民主潜力。","authors":"Mads Ejsing,&nbsp;Adam Veng,&nbsp;Irina Papazu","doi":"10.1007/s10584-023-03550-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent years, countries like France, UK, Germany, and Denmark have all carried out climate citizens' assemblies where a group of representatively selected citizens come together to discuss issues around climate politics and provide policy recommendations to decision-makers. The hope is that these deliberative-democratic innovations can circumvent the flaws of representational politics and help break the existing gridlock around climate politics. In this article, relying on the case of the Danish climate citizens' assembly that began its work in 2020, we argue that to truly realize the democratic potentials of climate citizens' assemblies, there is a need to think about how citizens' assemblies might come to multiply and proliferate in political spaces away from, or at least in addition to, those in and around the state, so they can become local drivers of democratic action and community empowerment. The argument is not that citizens' assemblies should give up on affecting the state and parliamentary politics altogether, but that we must be careful not to put too much faith in state institutions, and also look for spaces outside the state where the conditions for transformative change and democratic capacity-building currently appear more fecund. Drawing together these arguments, we offer what we call a more radical vision of the democratic potentials of climate citizens' assemblies, and provide some guidelines for what that would look like in practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":10372,"journal":{"name":"Climatic Change","volume":"176 6","pages":"73"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10227389/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Green politics beyond the state: radicalizing the democratic potentials of climate citizens' assemblies.\",\"authors\":\"Mads Ejsing,&nbsp;Adam Veng,&nbsp;Irina Papazu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10584-023-03550-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In recent years, countries like France, UK, Germany, and Denmark have all carried out climate citizens' assemblies where a group of representatively selected citizens come together to discuss issues around climate politics and provide policy recommendations to decision-makers. The hope is that these deliberative-democratic innovations can circumvent the flaws of representational politics and help break the existing gridlock around climate politics. In this article, relying on the case of the Danish climate citizens' assembly that began its work in 2020, we argue that to truly realize the democratic potentials of climate citizens' assemblies, there is a need to think about how citizens' assemblies might come to multiply and proliferate in political spaces away from, or at least in addition to, those in and around the state, so they can become local drivers of democratic action and community empowerment. The argument is not that citizens' assemblies should give up on affecting the state and parliamentary politics altogether, but that we must be careful not to put too much faith in state institutions, and also look for spaces outside the state where the conditions for transformative change and democratic capacity-building currently appear more fecund. Drawing together these arguments, we offer what we call a more radical vision of the democratic potentials of climate citizens' assemblies, and provide some guidelines for what that would look like in practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10372,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Climatic Change\",\"volume\":\"176 6\",\"pages\":\"73\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10227389/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Climatic Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-023-03550-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/5/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Climatic Change","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-023-03550-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,法国、英国、德国和丹麦等国都举行了气候公民大会,由一群有代表性的公民聚集在一起,讨论气候政治问题,并向决策者提供政策建议。希望这些深思熟虑的民主创新能够绕过代议制政治的缺陷,并有助于打破围绕气候政治的现有僵局。在这篇文章中,以2020年开始工作的丹麦气候公民大会为例,我们认为,为了真正实现气候公民大会的民主潜力,有必要思考公民大会如何在远离或至少在国家内外的政治空间中繁衍生息,因此,他们可以成为当地民主行动和社区赋权的推动者。争论的焦点并不是公民大会应该放弃完全影响国家和议会政治,而是我们必须小心,不要对国家机构抱有太多信心,也要在州外寻找变革和民主能力建设条件目前更为有利的空间。综合这些论点,我们对气候公民大会的民主潜力提出了我们所说的更激进的愿景,并为实际情况提供了一些指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Green politics beyond the state: radicalizing the democratic potentials of climate citizens' assemblies.

Green politics beyond the state: radicalizing the democratic potentials of climate citizens' assemblies.

Green politics beyond the state: radicalizing the democratic potentials of climate citizens' assemblies.

In recent years, countries like France, UK, Germany, and Denmark have all carried out climate citizens' assemblies where a group of representatively selected citizens come together to discuss issues around climate politics and provide policy recommendations to decision-makers. The hope is that these deliberative-democratic innovations can circumvent the flaws of representational politics and help break the existing gridlock around climate politics. In this article, relying on the case of the Danish climate citizens' assembly that began its work in 2020, we argue that to truly realize the democratic potentials of climate citizens' assemblies, there is a need to think about how citizens' assemblies might come to multiply and proliferate in political spaces away from, or at least in addition to, those in and around the state, so they can become local drivers of democratic action and community empowerment. The argument is not that citizens' assemblies should give up on affecting the state and parliamentary politics altogether, but that we must be careful not to put too much faith in state institutions, and also look for spaces outside the state where the conditions for transformative change and democratic capacity-building currently appear more fecund. Drawing together these arguments, we offer what we call a more radical vision of the democratic potentials of climate citizens' assemblies, and provide some guidelines for what that would look like in practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Climatic Change
Climatic Change 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
4.20%
发文量
180
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Climatic Change is dedicated to the totality of the problem of climatic variability and change - its descriptions, causes, implications and interactions among these. The purpose of the journal is to provide a means of exchange among those working in different disciplines on problems related to climatic variations. This means that authors have an opportunity to communicate the essence of their studies to people in other climate-related disciplines and to interested non-disciplinarians, as well as to report on research in which the originality is in the combinations of (not necessarily original) work from several disciplines. The journal also includes vigorous editorial and book review sections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信