溶栓治疗COVID-19相关ARDS的疗效和安全性。

Abhishek Goyal, Yogesh Niwariya, Neeraj Pawar, Alkesh Khurana, Poonam Chaudhary
{"title":"溶栓治疗COVID-19相关ARDS的疗效和安全性。","authors":"Abhishek Goyal,&nbsp;Yogesh Niwariya,&nbsp;Neeraj Pawar,&nbsp;Alkesh Khurana,&nbsp;Poonam Chaudhary","doi":"10.2174/2772434417666221012111042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>COVID-19 causes significant pulmonary microthrombi in some individuals, leading to ARDS and death. Thrombolysis could be an effective approach in some patients with severe ARDS. We describe our experience with the usage of thrombolytic agents in critically ill COVID-19 patients who were in worsening respiratory failure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective chart analysis was done in patients who were thrombolysed between May 2020-Sept 2020. Analysis was done to find out factors associated with improvement in oxygenation and survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven patients with severe ARDS [all had respiratory rate >30, FiO2 >0.6 (on NIV/HFNC) and PiO2/FiO2 ratio <120] were thrombolysed in our ICU for COVID19 causes. C.T. Pulmonary Angiography could not be done in any of the 27 patients due to poor general condition, but 2D echo was normal in most (5 had dilated RA, RV), and none of the patients was in shock. So, there was no conventional indication of thrombolysis in these patients, yet after thrombolysis, we observed dramatic changes in oxygenation (defined by a decrease in FiO2 by ≥0.2) in twenty patients. Five patients had a major bleed. Eleven patients survived (survival rate of 40.7%) and the survival rate was high {66% (8/12)} in patients who were thrombolysed within 2 days of oxygen requirement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this unprecedented pandemic with high mortality rates, efficacy of early thrombolysis needs to be further explored in randomised controlled trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":74643,"journal":{"name":"Recent advances in anti-infective drug discovery","volume":"18 3","pages":"197-204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of Thrombolysis in COVID-19 Related ARDS.\",\"authors\":\"Abhishek Goyal,&nbsp;Yogesh Niwariya,&nbsp;Neeraj Pawar,&nbsp;Alkesh Khurana,&nbsp;Poonam Chaudhary\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/2772434417666221012111042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>COVID-19 causes significant pulmonary microthrombi in some individuals, leading to ARDS and death. Thrombolysis could be an effective approach in some patients with severe ARDS. We describe our experience with the usage of thrombolytic agents in critically ill COVID-19 patients who were in worsening respiratory failure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective chart analysis was done in patients who were thrombolysed between May 2020-Sept 2020. Analysis was done to find out factors associated with improvement in oxygenation and survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven patients with severe ARDS [all had respiratory rate >30, FiO2 >0.6 (on NIV/HFNC) and PiO2/FiO2 ratio <120] were thrombolysed in our ICU for COVID19 causes. C.T. Pulmonary Angiography could not be done in any of the 27 patients due to poor general condition, but 2D echo was normal in most (5 had dilated RA, RV), and none of the patients was in shock. So, there was no conventional indication of thrombolysis in these patients, yet after thrombolysis, we observed dramatic changes in oxygenation (defined by a decrease in FiO2 by ≥0.2) in twenty patients. Five patients had a major bleed. Eleven patients survived (survival rate of 40.7%) and the survival rate was high {66% (8/12)} in patients who were thrombolysed within 2 days of oxygen requirement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this unprecedented pandemic with high mortality rates, efficacy of early thrombolysis needs to be further explored in randomised controlled trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Recent advances in anti-infective drug discovery\",\"volume\":\"18 3\",\"pages\":\"197-204\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Recent advances in anti-infective drug discovery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/2772434417666221012111042\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recent advances in anti-infective drug discovery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2772434417666221012111042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

简介:COVID-19在一些个体中引起明显的肺微血栓,导致ARDS和死亡。溶栓可能是一些严重急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的有效方法。我们描述了我们在呼吸衰竭恶化的COVID-19危重患者中使用溶栓药物的经验。方法:对2020年5月- 2020年9月溶栓患者进行回顾性图表分析。通过分析找出与氧合改善和生存率相关的因素。结果:27例严重急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者呼吸频率>30,FiO2 >0.6 (NIV/HFNC), PiO2/FiO2比值均大于0。结论:在这次死亡率高、前所未有的大流行中,早期溶栓的疗效有待于进一步的随机对照试验探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and Safety of Thrombolysis in COVID-19 Related ARDS.

Introduction: COVID-19 causes significant pulmonary microthrombi in some individuals, leading to ARDS and death. Thrombolysis could be an effective approach in some patients with severe ARDS. We describe our experience with the usage of thrombolytic agents in critically ill COVID-19 patients who were in worsening respiratory failure.

Methods: Retrospective chart analysis was done in patients who were thrombolysed between May 2020-Sept 2020. Analysis was done to find out factors associated with improvement in oxygenation and survival.

Results: Twenty-seven patients with severe ARDS [all had respiratory rate >30, FiO2 >0.6 (on NIV/HFNC) and PiO2/FiO2 ratio <120] were thrombolysed in our ICU for COVID19 causes. C.T. Pulmonary Angiography could not be done in any of the 27 patients due to poor general condition, but 2D echo was normal in most (5 had dilated RA, RV), and none of the patients was in shock. So, there was no conventional indication of thrombolysis in these patients, yet after thrombolysis, we observed dramatic changes in oxygenation (defined by a decrease in FiO2 by ≥0.2) in twenty patients. Five patients had a major bleed. Eleven patients survived (survival rate of 40.7%) and the survival rate was high {66% (8/12)} in patients who were thrombolysed within 2 days of oxygen requirement.

Conclusion: In this unprecedented pandemic with high mortality rates, efficacy of early thrombolysis needs to be further explored in randomised controlled trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信