抵制和打击网络种族仇恨：反种族主义宣传和应对网络种族主义，作为与网络种族主义相关的痛苦的调节者。

IF 3.8 1区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED

Journal of Counseling Psychology Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-25 DOI:10.1037/cou0000674

Brian TaeHyuk Keum, Vanessa Volpe

{"title":"抵制和打击网络种族仇恨：反种族主义宣传和应对网络种族主义，作为与网络种族主义相关的痛苦的调节者。","authors":"Brian TaeHyuk Keum, Vanessa Volpe","doi":"10.1037/cou0000674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The emerging literature highlights online racism (e.g., racist online interactions, exposure to racially traumatizing content) as a contemporary stressor among racially/ethnically minoritized adults. Thus, identifying factors that can help buffer the harmful impact of online racism are imperative. We examined engagement in antiracism advocacy and online coping as moderators that can potentially buffer the link between online racism and psychological distress. Using data from 395 racially/ethnically diverse adults (Mage = 34.12, SD = 11.19), we conducted latent moderated structural equation modeling to test individual and institutional antiracism advocacy, and online coping as moderators in the link between online racism and psychological distress. Individual antiracism advocacy was not a significant moderator. Both institutional antiracism advocacy and online coping were significant moderators. For both variables, the link between online racism and psychological distress was not significant at 1 SD below the mean but was significant at the mean and 1 SD above the mean. Thus, distress associated with online racism was not significant among those engaging in low levels of institutional antiracism advocacy and online coping but mean to high levels of institutional antiracism advocacy and online coping did not appear to be protective against distress. Implications for advancing the research on coping with online racism are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":48424,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Counseling Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resisting and countering online racial hate: Antiracism advocacy and coping online with racism as moderators of distress associated with online racism.\",\"authors\":\"Brian TaeHyuk Keum, Vanessa Volpe\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/cou0000674\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The emerging literature highlights online racism (e.g., racist online interactions, exposure to racially traumatizing content) as a contemporary stressor among racially/ethnically minoritized adults. Thus, identifying factors that can help buffer the harmful impact of online racism are imperative. We examined engagement in antiracism advocacy and online coping as moderators that can potentially buffer the link between online racism and psychological distress. Using data from 395 racially/ethnically diverse adults (Mage = 34.12, SD = 11.19), we conducted latent moderated structural equation modeling to test individual and institutional antiracism advocacy, and online coping as moderators in the link between online racism and psychological distress. Individual antiracism advocacy was not a significant moderator. Both institutional antiracism advocacy and online coping were significant moderators. For both variables, the link between online racism and psychological distress was not significant at 1 SD below the mean but was significant at the mean and 1 SD above the mean. Thus, distress associated with online racism was not significant among those engaging in low levels of institutional antiracism advocacy and online coping but mean to high levels of institutional antiracism advocacy and online coping did not appear to be protective against distress. Implications for advancing the research on coping with online racism are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).\",\"PeriodicalId\":48424,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Counseling Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Counseling Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000674\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/5/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Counseling Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000674","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

新兴的文献强调，网络种族主义（例如，种族主义的网络互动、接触种族创伤内容）是种族/族裔少数化成年人的当代压力源。因此，确定有助于缓冲网络种族主义有害影响的因素至关重要。我们研究了作为主持人参与反种族主义宣传和在线应对的情况，这些活动可能会缓冲网络种族主义和心理困扰之间的联系。使用来自395名种族/族裔多元化成年人的数据（Mage=34.12，SD=111.19），我们进行了潜在的调节结构方程建模，以测试个人和机构的反种族主义宣传，以及作为网络种族主义和心理困扰之间联系的调节者的网络应对。个人的反种族主义宣传并不是一个重要的调节因素。机构反种族主义宣传和在线应对都是重要的调节因素。对于这两个变量，在低于平均值1 SD时，网络种族主义与心理困扰之间的联系并不显著，但在高于平均值1 SD。因此，在那些参与低水平机构反种族主义宣传和在线应对的人中，与网络种族主义相关的痛苦并不显著，但意味着高水平机构反性别主义宣传和网络应对似乎无法保护他们免受痛苦。讨论了对推进应对网络种族主义研究的启示。（PsycInfo数据库记录（c）2023 APA，保留所有权利）。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Resisting and countering online racial hate: Antiracism advocacy and coping online with racism as moderators of distress associated with online racism.

The emerging literature highlights online racism (e.g., racist online interactions, exposure to racially traumatizing content) as a contemporary stressor among racially/ethnically minoritized adults. Thus, identifying factors that can help buffer the harmful impact of online racism are imperative. We examined engagement in antiracism advocacy and online coping as moderators that can potentially buffer the link between online racism and psychological distress. Using data from 395 racially/ethnically diverse adults (Mage = 34.12, SD = 11.19), we conducted latent moderated structural equation modeling to test individual and institutional antiracism advocacy, and online coping as moderators in the link between online racism and psychological distress. Individual antiracism advocacy was not a significant moderator. Both institutional antiracism advocacy and online coping were significant moderators. For both variables, the link between online racism and psychological distress was not significant at 1 SD below the mean but was significant at the mean and 1 SD above the mean. Thus, distress associated with online racism was not significant among those engaging in low levels of institutional antiracism advocacy and online coping but mean to high levels of institutional antiracism advocacy and online coping did not appear to be protective against distress. Implications for advancing the research on coping with online racism are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Counseling Psychology Multiple-

CiteScore

7.60

自引率

7.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Counseling Psychology® publishes empirical research in the areas of counseling activities (including assessment, interventions, consultation, supervision, training, prevention, and psychological education) career development and vocational psychology diversity and underrepresented populations in relation to counseling activities the development of new measures to be used in counseling activities professional issues in counseling psychology In addition, the Journal of Counseling Psychology considers reviews or theoretical contributions that have the potential for stimulating further research in counseling psychology, and conceptual or empirical contributions about methodological issues in counseling psychology research.