Marianne Webb, Elise R Carrotte, Anna Flego, Bonnie Vincent, Benjamin Lee-Bates, Jack Heath, Michelle Blanchard
{"title":"一种新型数字自杀预防运动挑战感知负担的安全性、可接受性和初始有效性。","authors":"Marianne Webb, Elise R Carrotte, Anna Flego, Bonnie Vincent, Benjamin Lee-Bates, Jack Heath, Michelle Blanchard","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> <i>Better Off With You</i> is a peer-to-peer, digital suicide prevention campaign pilot designed to challenge the idea of perceived burdensomeness; the schema experienced by many people contemplating suicide that they are a burden on others. <i>Aims:</i> To investigate the safety, acceptability, and initial effectiveness of the campaign. <i>Method:</i> This mixed methods pilot involved a general community sample (<i>N</i> = 157), from targeted sites within two Australian communities. Data were collected at baseline and after 1-week exposure to the campaign videos and website. Qualitative interviews were conducted with a subset of participants (<i>N</i> = 15). <i>Results:</i> Participants rated the campaign as highly engaging and relevant to local communities. In interviews, participants identified the campaign as being unique, safe, and impactful. Overall, exposure to <i>Better Off With You</i> did not result in any notable changes in perceived burdensomeness, psychological distress, or help-seeking. <i>Limitations:</i> The pilot involved a community sample. As such, outcome measurement scores were low at baseline. <i>Conclusion:</i> This pilot provides new insights about the safety, engagement and initial effectiveness of the <i>Better Off With You</i> campaign. Future research is needed to explore its impact on people experiencing suicidal ideation.</p>","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":"44 3","pages":"189-197"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety, Acceptability, and Initial Effectiveness of a Novel Digital Suicide Prevention Campaign Challenging Perceived Burdensomeness.\",\"authors\":\"Marianne Webb, Elise R Carrotte, Anna Flego, Bonnie Vincent, Benjamin Lee-Bates, Jack Heath, Michelle Blanchard\",\"doi\":\"10.1027/0227-5910/a000840\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> <i>Better Off With You</i> is a peer-to-peer, digital suicide prevention campaign pilot designed to challenge the idea of perceived burdensomeness; the schema experienced by many people contemplating suicide that they are a burden on others. <i>Aims:</i> To investigate the safety, acceptability, and initial effectiveness of the campaign. <i>Method:</i> This mixed methods pilot involved a general community sample (<i>N</i> = 157), from targeted sites within two Australian communities. Data were collected at baseline and after 1-week exposure to the campaign videos and website. Qualitative interviews were conducted with a subset of participants (<i>N</i> = 15). <i>Results:</i> Participants rated the campaign as highly engaging and relevant to local communities. In interviews, participants identified the campaign as being unique, safe, and impactful. Overall, exposure to <i>Better Off With You</i> did not result in any notable changes in perceived burdensomeness, psychological distress, or help-seeking. <i>Limitations:</i> The pilot involved a community sample. As such, outcome measurement scores were low at baseline. <i>Conclusion:</i> This pilot provides new insights about the safety, engagement and initial effectiveness of the <i>Better Off With You</i> campaign. Future research is needed to explore its impact on people experiencing suicidal ideation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47943,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention\",\"volume\":\"44 3\",\"pages\":\"189-197\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000840\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000840","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
背景:Better Off With You是一个点对点的数字自杀预防运动试点项目,旨在挑战人们认为自己是负担的想法;很多想要自杀的人都有这样的想法,他们认为自己是别人的负担。目的:调查该活动的安全性、可接受性和初步有效性。方法:这个混合方法试点涉及一个普通社区样本(N = 157),来自两个澳大利亚社区的目标地点。数据收集在基线和1周后的活动视频和网站曝光。对一部分参与者(N = 15)进行了定性访谈。结果:参与者对该活动的评价是高度参与和与当地社区相关。在采访中,参与者认为该活动是独特的、安全的、有影响力的。总的来说,接触《与你一起过得更好》并没有导致感知负担、心理困扰或寻求帮助方面的任何显著变化。局限性:该试点涉及一个社区样本。因此,结果测量得分在基线时较低。结论:该试点项目提供了关于Better Off With You活动的安全性、参与性和初始有效性的新见解。未来的研究需要探索它对经历自杀意念的人的影响。
Safety, Acceptability, and Initial Effectiveness of a Novel Digital Suicide Prevention Campaign Challenging Perceived Burdensomeness.
Background:Better Off With You is a peer-to-peer, digital suicide prevention campaign pilot designed to challenge the idea of perceived burdensomeness; the schema experienced by many people contemplating suicide that they are a burden on others. Aims: To investigate the safety, acceptability, and initial effectiveness of the campaign. Method: This mixed methods pilot involved a general community sample (N = 157), from targeted sites within two Australian communities. Data were collected at baseline and after 1-week exposure to the campaign videos and website. Qualitative interviews were conducted with a subset of participants (N = 15). Results: Participants rated the campaign as highly engaging and relevant to local communities. In interviews, participants identified the campaign as being unique, safe, and impactful. Overall, exposure to Better Off With You did not result in any notable changes in perceived burdensomeness, psychological distress, or help-seeking. Limitations: The pilot involved a community sample. As such, outcome measurement scores were low at baseline. Conclusion: This pilot provides new insights about the safety, engagement and initial effectiveness of the Better Off With You campaign. Future research is needed to explore its impact on people experiencing suicidal ideation.
期刊介绍:
A must for all who need to keep up on the latest findings from both basic research and practical experience in the fields of suicide prevention and crisis intervention! This well-established periodical’s reputation for publishing important articles on suicidology and crisis intervention from around the world is being further enhanced with the move to 6 issues per year (previously 4) in 2010. But over and above its scientific reputation, Crisis also publishes potentially life-saving information for all those involved in crisis intervention and suicide prevention, making it important reading for clinicians, counselors, hotlines, and crisis intervention centers.