重性抑郁症的心电诱发电位:文拉法辛与rTMS治疗差异预测的生物标志物?

IF 2.3 4区 心理学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Lauren Zwienenberg, Hanneke van Dijk, Stefanie Enriquez-Geppert, Nikita van der Vinne, Richard Gevirtz, Evian Gordon, Alexander T Sack, Martijn Arns
{"title":"重性抑郁症的心电诱发电位:文拉法辛与rTMS治疗差异预测的生物标志物?","authors":"Lauren Zwienenberg,&nbsp;Hanneke van Dijk,&nbsp;Stefanie Enriquez-Geppert,&nbsp;Nikita van der Vinne,&nbsp;Richard Gevirtz,&nbsp;Evian Gordon,&nbsp;Alexander T Sack,&nbsp;Martijn Arns","doi":"10.1159/000529308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Currently, major depressive disorder (MDD) treatment plans are based on trial-and-error, and remission rates remain low. A strategy to replace trial-and-error and increase remission rates could be treatment stratification. We explored the heartbeat-evoked potential (HEP) as a biomarker for treatment stratification to either antidepressant medication or rTMS treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two datasets were analyzed: (1) the International Study to Predict Optimized Treatment in Depression (iSPOT-D; n = 1,008 MDD patients, randomized to escitalopram, sertraline, or venlafaxine, and n = 336 healthy controls) and (2) a multi-site, open-label rTMS study (n = 196). The primary outcome measure was remission. Cardiac field artifacts were removed from the baseline EEG using independent component analysis (ICA). The HEP-peak was detected in a bandwidth of 20 ms around 8 ms and 270 ms (N8, N270) after the R-peak of the electrocardiogram signal. Differences between remitters and non-remitters were statistically assessed by repeated-measures ANOVAs for electrodes Fp1, Cz, and Oz.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the venlafaxine subgroup, remitters showed a lower HEP around the N8 peak than non-remitters on electrode site Cz (p = 0.004; d = 0.497). The rTMS group showed a non-significant difference in the opposite direction (d = -0.051). Retrospective stratification to one of the treatments based on the HEP resulted in enhanced treatment outcome prediction for venlafaxine (+22.98%) and rTMS (+10.66%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These data suggest that the HEP could be used as a stratification biomarker between venlafaxine and rTMS; however, future out-of-sample replication is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":19239,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychobiology","volume":"82 3","pages":"158-167"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heartbeat-Evoked Potential in Major Depressive Disorder: A Biomarker for Differential Treatment Prediction between Venlafaxine and rTMS?\",\"authors\":\"Lauren Zwienenberg,&nbsp;Hanneke van Dijk,&nbsp;Stefanie Enriquez-Geppert,&nbsp;Nikita van der Vinne,&nbsp;Richard Gevirtz,&nbsp;Evian Gordon,&nbsp;Alexander T Sack,&nbsp;Martijn Arns\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000529308\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Currently, major depressive disorder (MDD) treatment plans are based on trial-and-error, and remission rates remain low. A strategy to replace trial-and-error and increase remission rates could be treatment stratification. We explored the heartbeat-evoked potential (HEP) as a biomarker for treatment stratification to either antidepressant medication or rTMS treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two datasets were analyzed: (1) the International Study to Predict Optimized Treatment in Depression (iSPOT-D; n = 1,008 MDD patients, randomized to escitalopram, sertraline, or venlafaxine, and n = 336 healthy controls) and (2) a multi-site, open-label rTMS study (n = 196). The primary outcome measure was remission. Cardiac field artifacts were removed from the baseline EEG using independent component analysis (ICA). The HEP-peak was detected in a bandwidth of 20 ms around 8 ms and 270 ms (N8, N270) after the R-peak of the electrocardiogram signal. Differences between remitters and non-remitters were statistically assessed by repeated-measures ANOVAs for electrodes Fp1, Cz, and Oz.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the venlafaxine subgroup, remitters showed a lower HEP around the N8 peak than non-remitters on electrode site Cz (p = 0.004; d = 0.497). The rTMS group showed a non-significant difference in the opposite direction (d = -0.051). Retrospective stratification to one of the treatments based on the HEP resulted in enhanced treatment outcome prediction for venlafaxine (+22.98%) and rTMS (+10.66%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These data suggest that the HEP could be used as a stratification biomarker between venlafaxine and rTMS; however, future out-of-sample replication is warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuropsychobiology\",\"volume\":\"82 3\",\"pages\":\"158-167\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuropsychobiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000529308\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychobiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000529308","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目前,重度抑郁症(MDD)的治疗方案是基于反复试验,缓解率仍然很低。治疗分层是一种替代试错和提高缓解率的策略。我们探索了心跳诱发电位(HEP)作为抗抑郁药物或rTMS治疗分层的生物标志物。方法:对两个数据集进行分析:(1)国际抑郁症优化治疗预测研究(iSPOT-D);n = 1008名重度抑郁症患者,随机分为艾司西酞普兰、舍曲林或文拉法辛组,n = 336名健康对照)和(2)一项多地点、开放标签的rTMS研究(n = 196)。主要结局指标为缓解。使用独立分量分析(ICA)从基线脑电图中去除心野伪影。在心电图信号r峰后约8ms和270 ms (N8, N270)处的20 ms带宽处检测到hep峰。通过重复测量方差分析(anova)对Fp1、Cz和oz3个电极进行统计学评估。结果:在文拉法辛亚组中,在电极Cz位置,在N8峰附近,缓解者的HEP低于非缓解者(p = 0.004;D = 0.497)。rTMS组在相反方向上差异无统计学意义(d = -0.051)。根据HEP对其中一种治疗进行回顾性分层,文拉法辛(+22.98%)和rTMS(+10.66%)的治疗结果预测增强。结论:HEP可作为文拉法辛与rTMS之间的分层生物标志物;然而,未来的样本外复制是有保证的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Heartbeat-Evoked Potential in Major Depressive Disorder: A Biomarker for Differential Treatment Prediction between Venlafaxine and rTMS?

Introduction: Currently, major depressive disorder (MDD) treatment plans are based on trial-and-error, and remission rates remain low. A strategy to replace trial-and-error and increase remission rates could be treatment stratification. We explored the heartbeat-evoked potential (HEP) as a biomarker for treatment stratification to either antidepressant medication or rTMS treatment.

Methods: Two datasets were analyzed: (1) the International Study to Predict Optimized Treatment in Depression (iSPOT-D; n = 1,008 MDD patients, randomized to escitalopram, sertraline, or venlafaxine, and n = 336 healthy controls) and (2) a multi-site, open-label rTMS study (n = 196). The primary outcome measure was remission. Cardiac field artifacts were removed from the baseline EEG using independent component analysis (ICA). The HEP-peak was detected in a bandwidth of 20 ms around 8 ms and 270 ms (N8, N270) after the R-peak of the electrocardiogram signal. Differences between remitters and non-remitters were statistically assessed by repeated-measures ANOVAs for electrodes Fp1, Cz, and Oz.

Results: In the venlafaxine subgroup, remitters showed a lower HEP around the N8 peak than non-remitters on electrode site Cz (p = 0.004; d = 0.497). The rTMS group showed a non-significant difference in the opposite direction (d = -0.051). Retrospective stratification to one of the treatments based on the HEP resulted in enhanced treatment outcome prediction for venlafaxine (+22.98%) and rTMS (+10.66%).

Conclusion: These data suggest that the HEP could be used as a stratification biomarker between venlafaxine and rTMS; however, future out-of-sample replication is warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuropsychobiology
Neuropsychobiology 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The biological approach to mental disorders continues to yield innovative findings of clinical importance, particularly if methodologies are combined. This journal collects high quality empirical studies from various experimental and clinical approaches in the fields of Biological Psychiatry, Biological Psychology and Neuropsychology. It features original, clinical and basic research in the fields of neurophysiology and functional imaging, neuropharmacology and neurochemistry, neuroendocrinology and neuroimmunology, genetics and their relationships with normal psychology and psychopathology. In addition, the reader will find studies on animal models of mental disorders and therapeutic interventions, and pharmacoelectroencephalographic studies. Regular reviews report new methodologic approaches, and selected case reports provide hints for future research. ''Neuropsychobiology'' is a complete record of strategies and methodologies employed to study the biological basis of mental functions including their interactions with psychological and social factors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信