一个可解释的人工智能支持的心电图分析模型,用于左心室功能降低的分类。

IF 3.9 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Susumu Katsushika, Satoshi Kodera, Shinnosuke Sawano, Hiroki Shinohara, Naoto Setoguchi, Kengo Tanabe, Yasutomi Higashikuni, Norifumi Takeda, Katsuhito Fujiu, Masao Daimon, Hiroshi Akazawa, Hiroyuki Morita, Issei Komuro
{"title":"一个可解释的人工智能支持的心电图分析模型,用于左心室功能降低的分类。","authors":"Susumu Katsushika,&nbsp;Satoshi Kodera,&nbsp;Shinnosuke Sawano,&nbsp;Hiroki Shinohara,&nbsp;Naoto Setoguchi,&nbsp;Kengo Tanabe,&nbsp;Yasutomi Higashikuni,&nbsp;Norifumi Takeda,&nbsp;Katsuhito Fujiu,&nbsp;Masao Daimon,&nbsp;Hiroshi Akazawa,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Morita,&nbsp;Issei Komuro","doi":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztad027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The black box nature of artificial intelligence (AI) hinders the development of interpretable AI models that are applicable in clinical practice. We aimed to develop an AI model for classifying patients of reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECG) with the decision-interpretability.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We acquired paired ECG and echocardiography datasets from the central and co-operative institutions. For the central institution dataset, a random forest model was trained to identify patients with reduced LVEF among 29 907 ECGs. Shapley additive explanations were applied to 7196 ECGs. To extract the model's decision criteria, the calculated Shapley additive explanations values were clustered for 192 non-paced rhythm patients in which reduced LVEF was predicted. Although the extracted criteria were different for each cluster, these criteria generally comprised a combination of six ECG findings: negative T-wave inversion in I/V5-6 leads, low voltage in I/II/V4-6 leads, Q wave in V3-6 leads, ventricular activation time prolongation in I/V5-6 leads, S-wave prolongation in V2-3 leads, and corrected QT interval prolongation. Similarly, for the co-operative institution dataset, the extracted criteria comprised a combination of the same six ECG findings. Furthermore, the accuracy of seven cardiologists' ECG readings improved significantly after watching a video explaining the interpretation of these criteria (before, 62.9% ± 3.9% vs. after, 73.9% ± 2.4%; <i>P</i> = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We visually interpreted the model's decision criteria to evaluate its validity, thereby developing a model that provided the decision-interpretability required for clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":72965,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal. Digital health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10232279/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An explainable artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram analysis model for the classification of reduced left ventricular function.\",\"authors\":\"Susumu Katsushika,&nbsp;Satoshi Kodera,&nbsp;Shinnosuke Sawano,&nbsp;Hiroki Shinohara,&nbsp;Naoto Setoguchi,&nbsp;Kengo Tanabe,&nbsp;Yasutomi Higashikuni,&nbsp;Norifumi Takeda,&nbsp;Katsuhito Fujiu,&nbsp;Masao Daimon,&nbsp;Hiroshi Akazawa,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Morita,&nbsp;Issei Komuro\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjdh/ztad027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The black box nature of artificial intelligence (AI) hinders the development of interpretable AI models that are applicable in clinical practice. We aimed to develop an AI model for classifying patients of reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECG) with the decision-interpretability.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We acquired paired ECG and echocardiography datasets from the central and co-operative institutions. For the central institution dataset, a random forest model was trained to identify patients with reduced LVEF among 29 907 ECGs. Shapley additive explanations were applied to 7196 ECGs. To extract the model's decision criteria, the calculated Shapley additive explanations values were clustered for 192 non-paced rhythm patients in which reduced LVEF was predicted. Although the extracted criteria were different for each cluster, these criteria generally comprised a combination of six ECG findings: negative T-wave inversion in I/V5-6 leads, low voltage in I/II/V4-6 leads, Q wave in V3-6 leads, ventricular activation time prolongation in I/V5-6 leads, S-wave prolongation in V2-3 leads, and corrected QT interval prolongation. Similarly, for the co-operative institution dataset, the extracted criteria comprised a combination of the same six ECG findings. Furthermore, the accuracy of seven cardiologists' ECG readings improved significantly after watching a video explaining the interpretation of these criteria (before, 62.9% ± 3.9% vs. after, 73.9% ± 2.4%; <i>P</i> = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We visually interpreted the model's decision criteria to evaluate its validity, thereby developing a model that provided the decision-interpretability required for clinical application.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72965,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European heart journal. Digital health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10232279/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European heart journal. Digital health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztad027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal. Digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztad027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:人工智能(AI)的黑箱性质阻碍了可用于临床实践的可解释AI模型的发展。我们旨在开发一种人工智能模型,用于从12导联心电图(ECG)中对左室射血分数降低(LVEF)患者进行分类,并具有决策可解释性。方法和结果:我们从中央和合作机构获得配对的心电图和超声心动图数据集。对于中央机构数据集,训练随机森林模型以识别29907例心电图中LVEF降低的患者。7196例心电图采用Shapley加性解释。为了提取模型的决策准则,对192例预测LVEF降低的非节律性心律患者的计算Shapley加性解释值进行聚类。虽然每个聚类提取的标准不同,但这些标准通常包括六种ECG表现的组合:I/V5-6导联t波负反转,I/II/V4-6导联低电压,V3-6导联Q波,I/V5-6导联心室激活时间延长,V2-3导联s波延长,校正QT间期延长。同样,对于合作机构数据集,提取的标准包括相同的六个ECG结果的组合。此外,7名心内科医生在观看了解释这些标准的视频后,心电读数的准确性显著提高(之前,62.9%±3.9% vs.之后,73.9%±2.4%;P = 0.02)。结论:我们可视化地解释了模型的决策标准来评估其有效性,从而开发了一个提供临床应用所需的决策可解释性的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

An explainable artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram analysis model for the classification of reduced left ventricular function.

An explainable artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram analysis model for the classification of reduced left ventricular function.

An explainable artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram analysis model for the classification of reduced left ventricular function.

An explainable artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram analysis model for the classification of reduced left ventricular function.

Aims: The black box nature of artificial intelligence (AI) hinders the development of interpretable AI models that are applicable in clinical practice. We aimed to develop an AI model for classifying patients of reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECG) with the decision-interpretability.

Methods and results: We acquired paired ECG and echocardiography datasets from the central and co-operative institutions. For the central institution dataset, a random forest model was trained to identify patients with reduced LVEF among 29 907 ECGs. Shapley additive explanations were applied to 7196 ECGs. To extract the model's decision criteria, the calculated Shapley additive explanations values were clustered for 192 non-paced rhythm patients in which reduced LVEF was predicted. Although the extracted criteria were different for each cluster, these criteria generally comprised a combination of six ECG findings: negative T-wave inversion in I/V5-6 leads, low voltage in I/II/V4-6 leads, Q wave in V3-6 leads, ventricular activation time prolongation in I/V5-6 leads, S-wave prolongation in V2-3 leads, and corrected QT interval prolongation. Similarly, for the co-operative institution dataset, the extracted criteria comprised a combination of the same six ECG findings. Furthermore, the accuracy of seven cardiologists' ECG readings improved significantly after watching a video explaining the interpretation of these criteria (before, 62.9% ± 3.9% vs. after, 73.9% ± 2.4%; P = 0.02).

Conclusion: We visually interpreted the model's decision criteria to evaluate its validity, thereby developing a model that provided the decision-interpretability required for clinical application.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信