心脏康复的虚拟医疗解决方案:文献综述。

IF 3.9 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Keni C S Lee, Boris Breznen, Anastasia Ukhova, Friedrich Koehler, Seth S Martin
{"title":"心脏康复的虚拟医疗解决方案:文献综述。","authors":"Keni C S Lee,&nbsp;Boris Breznen,&nbsp;Anastasia Ukhova,&nbsp;Friedrich Koehler,&nbsp;Seth S Martin","doi":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztad005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Graphical AbstractAdherence to cardiac rehabilitation following a primary event has been demonstrated to improve quality of life, increase functional capacity, and decrease hospitalizations and mortality. Mobile technologies offer an opportunity to improve both the quality and utilization of cardiac rehabilitation, and recent clinical studies investigated this technology. This literature review summarizes the current use of mobile health, wearable activity monitors (WAMs), and other multi-component technologies deployed to support home-based virtual cardiac rehabilitation. The methodology was adapted from the <i>Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions</i>. We identified 2094 records, of which 113 were eligible for qualitative analysis. Different virtual cardiac rehabilitation solutions were implemented in the studies: (i) multi-component interventions in 48 studies (42.5%), (ii) WAMs in 27 studies (23.9%), (iii) web-based communications solutions, and (iv) mobile apps, both in 19 studies (16.4%). Functional capacity was the most frequently reported primary outcome (<i>k</i> = 37, 32.7%), followed by user adherence/compliance (<i>k</i> = 35, 31.0%), physical activity (<i>k</i> = 27, 23.9%), and quality of life (<i>k</i> = 14, 12.4%). Studies provided a mixed assessment of the efficacy of virtual cardiac rehabilitation in attaining either significant improvements over baseline or significant improvements in outcomes compared with conventional rehabilitation. Efficacy outcomes with virtual cardiac rehabilitation sometimes improve on the centre-based outcomes; however, superior clinical efficacy may not necessarily be the only outcome of interest. The promise of virtual cardiac rehabilitation includes the potential for increased user adherence and longer-term patient engagement. If these outcomes can be improved, that would be a significant justification for using this technology.</p>","PeriodicalId":72965,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal. Digital health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/39/df/ztad005.PMC10039430.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Virtual healthcare solutions for cardiac rehabilitation: a literature review.\",\"authors\":\"Keni C S Lee,&nbsp;Boris Breznen,&nbsp;Anastasia Ukhova,&nbsp;Friedrich Koehler,&nbsp;Seth S Martin\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjdh/ztad005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Graphical AbstractAdherence to cardiac rehabilitation following a primary event has been demonstrated to improve quality of life, increase functional capacity, and decrease hospitalizations and mortality. Mobile technologies offer an opportunity to improve both the quality and utilization of cardiac rehabilitation, and recent clinical studies investigated this technology. This literature review summarizes the current use of mobile health, wearable activity monitors (WAMs), and other multi-component technologies deployed to support home-based virtual cardiac rehabilitation. The methodology was adapted from the <i>Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions</i>. We identified 2094 records, of which 113 were eligible for qualitative analysis. Different virtual cardiac rehabilitation solutions were implemented in the studies: (i) multi-component interventions in 48 studies (42.5%), (ii) WAMs in 27 studies (23.9%), (iii) web-based communications solutions, and (iv) mobile apps, both in 19 studies (16.4%). Functional capacity was the most frequently reported primary outcome (<i>k</i> = 37, 32.7%), followed by user adherence/compliance (<i>k</i> = 35, 31.0%), physical activity (<i>k</i> = 27, 23.9%), and quality of life (<i>k</i> = 14, 12.4%). Studies provided a mixed assessment of the efficacy of virtual cardiac rehabilitation in attaining either significant improvements over baseline or significant improvements in outcomes compared with conventional rehabilitation. Efficacy outcomes with virtual cardiac rehabilitation sometimes improve on the centre-based outcomes; however, superior clinical efficacy may not necessarily be the only outcome of interest. The promise of virtual cardiac rehabilitation includes the potential for increased user adherence and longer-term patient engagement. If these outcomes can be improved, that would be a significant justification for using this technology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72965,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European heart journal. Digital health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/39/df/ztad005.PMC10039430.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European heart journal. Digital health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztad005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal. Digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztad005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

图表摘要:在原发性疾病后坚持心脏康复已被证明可以改善生活质量,增加功能能力,减少住院和死亡率。移动技术为提高心脏康复的质量和利用提供了机会,最近的临床研究对这项技术进行了研究。本文献综述总结了目前移动医疗、可穿戴活动监测仪(WAMs)和其他多组件技术的使用,以支持基于家庭的虚拟心脏康复。方法改编自Cochrane干预措施系统评价手册。我们确定了2094条记录,其中113条符合定性分析。研究中采用了不同的虚拟心脏康复解决方案:(i) 48项研究(42.5%)采用多组分干预,(ii) 27项研究采用WAMs (23.9%), (iii)基于网络的通信解决方案,(iv)移动应用程序,均为19项研究(16.4%)。功能能力是最常见的主要预后指标(k = 37, 32.7%),其次是使用者依从性/依从性(k = 35, 31.0%)、身体活动(k = 27, 23.9%)和生活质量(k = 14, 12.4%)。研究对虚拟心脏康复的疗效进行了混合评估,无论是在基线上取得显著改善,还是在结果上与传统康复相比取得显著改善。虚拟心脏康复的疗效结果有时优于基于中心的结果;然而,优异的临床疗效不一定是唯一的结果。虚拟心脏康复的前景包括增加用户依从性和长期患者参与的潜力。如果这些结果可以得到改善,那将是使用这项技术的一个重要理由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Virtual healthcare solutions for cardiac rehabilitation: a literature review.

Virtual healthcare solutions for cardiac rehabilitation: a literature review.

Virtual healthcare solutions for cardiac rehabilitation: a literature review.

Virtual healthcare solutions for cardiac rehabilitation: a literature review.

Graphical AbstractAdherence to cardiac rehabilitation following a primary event has been demonstrated to improve quality of life, increase functional capacity, and decrease hospitalizations and mortality. Mobile technologies offer an opportunity to improve both the quality and utilization of cardiac rehabilitation, and recent clinical studies investigated this technology. This literature review summarizes the current use of mobile health, wearable activity monitors (WAMs), and other multi-component technologies deployed to support home-based virtual cardiac rehabilitation. The methodology was adapted from the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. We identified 2094 records, of which 113 were eligible for qualitative analysis. Different virtual cardiac rehabilitation solutions were implemented in the studies: (i) multi-component interventions in 48 studies (42.5%), (ii) WAMs in 27 studies (23.9%), (iii) web-based communications solutions, and (iv) mobile apps, both in 19 studies (16.4%). Functional capacity was the most frequently reported primary outcome (k = 37, 32.7%), followed by user adherence/compliance (k = 35, 31.0%), physical activity (k = 27, 23.9%), and quality of life (k = 14, 12.4%). Studies provided a mixed assessment of the efficacy of virtual cardiac rehabilitation in attaining either significant improvements over baseline or significant improvements in outcomes compared with conventional rehabilitation. Efficacy outcomes with virtual cardiac rehabilitation sometimes improve on the centre-based outcomes; however, superior clinical efficacy may not necessarily be the only outcome of interest. The promise of virtual cardiac rehabilitation includes the potential for increased user adherence and longer-term patient engagement. If these outcomes can be improved, that would be a significant justification for using this technology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信