Lauren Frenzel Schuch, Karolina Skarlet Silva Viana, José Alcides Almeida de Arruda, Lucas Guimarães Abreu, Maria Cássia Ferreira de Aguiar, Vanessa Fátima Bernardes
{"title":"烟草对受 OSCC 影响的吸烟者和非吸烟者 DNA 的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Lauren Frenzel Schuch, Karolina Skarlet Silva Viana, José Alcides Almeida de Arruda, Lucas Guimarães Abreu, Maria Cássia Ferreira de Aguiar, Vanessa Fátima Bernardes","doi":"10.1590/1807-3107bor-2023.vol37.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Scientific evidence about genetic and molecular changes in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) among smokers and non-smokers is inconclusive. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the effects of tobacco on the DNA of individuals with OSCC based on protein mutations. Electronic searches were conducted on PubMed, Ovid, Web of Science, and Scopus to identify observational studies published up to January/2022. The Joanna Briggs Institute tool was used for the critical appraisal of studies. The certainty of the evidence was evaluated. Twenty-three studies assessing 4,060 individuals (2,967 smokers vs. 1,093 non-smokers) were included in this review. Fifteen groups of proteins/genes were investigated. Analysis of the quality of articles revealed low risk of bias in most studies. The certainty of the evidence was very low. The meta-analysis confirmed no significant difference between smokers and non-smokers with respect to damage to GSTM1 (OR: 0.60; 95%CI: 0.30-1.18), GSTT1 (OR: 1.18; 95%CI:0.49-2.83), hydrolase proteins (Ku70 and Ku80) (OR: 0.74; 95%CI: 0.18-3.05), and transferase proteins (GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTM3) (OR: 0.74; 95%CI: 0.47-1.18). Most of the studies included showed that smokers are more likely to exhibit genetic instability. However, the meta-analysis revealed that smokers do not necessarily have more genetic alterations in the DNA than non-smokers.</p>","PeriodicalId":48942,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Oral Research","volume":"37 ","pages":"e008"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of tobacco on the DNA of smokers and non-smokers affected by OSCC: systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Lauren Frenzel Schuch, Karolina Skarlet Silva Viana, José Alcides Almeida de Arruda, Lucas Guimarães Abreu, Maria Cássia Ferreira de Aguiar, Vanessa Fátima Bernardes\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1807-3107bor-2023.vol37.0008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Scientific evidence about genetic and molecular changes in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) among smokers and non-smokers is inconclusive. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the effects of tobacco on the DNA of individuals with OSCC based on protein mutations. Electronic searches were conducted on PubMed, Ovid, Web of Science, and Scopus to identify observational studies published up to January/2022. The Joanna Briggs Institute tool was used for the critical appraisal of studies. The certainty of the evidence was evaluated. Twenty-three studies assessing 4,060 individuals (2,967 smokers vs. 1,093 non-smokers) were included in this review. Fifteen groups of proteins/genes were investigated. Analysis of the quality of articles revealed low risk of bias in most studies. The certainty of the evidence was very low. The meta-analysis confirmed no significant difference between smokers and non-smokers with respect to damage to GSTM1 (OR: 0.60; 95%CI: 0.30-1.18), GSTT1 (OR: 1.18; 95%CI:0.49-2.83), hydrolase proteins (Ku70 and Ku80) (OR: 0.74; 95%CI: 0.18-3.05), and transferase proteins (GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTM3) (OR: 0.74; 95%CI: 0.47-1.18). Most of the studies included showed that smokers are more likely to exhibit genetic instability. However, the meta-analysis revealed that smokers do not necessarily have more genetic alterations in the DNA than non-smokers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48942,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Oral Research\",\"volume\":\"37 \",\"pages\":\"e008\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Oral Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2023.vol37.0008\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Oral Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2023.vol37.0008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
有关吸烟者和非吸烟者口腔鳞状细胞癌(OSCC)基因和分子变化的科学证据尚无定论。本系统综述和荟萃分析根据蛋白质突变评估了烟草对 OSCC 患者 DNA 的影响。我们在PubMed、Ovid、Web of Science和Scopus上进行了电子检索,以确定截至2022年1月发表的观察性研究。乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)的工具用于对研究进行批判性评估。对证据的确定性进行了评估。本综述共纳入 23 项研究,评估了 4,060 名个体(2,967 名吸烟者与 1,093 名非吸烟者)。研究了 15 组蛋白质/基因。对文章质量的分析表明,大多数研究的偏倚风险较低。证据的确定性很低。荟萃分析证实,吸烟者与非吸烟者在 GSTM1(OR:0.60;95%CI:0.30-1.18)、GSTT1(OR:1.18;95%CI:0.49-2.83)、水解酶蛋白(Ku70 和 Ku80)(OR:0.74;95%CI:0.18-3.05)和转移酶蛋白(GSTM1、GSTT1、GSTM3)(OR:0.74;95%CI:0.47-1.18)。纳入的大多数研究表明,吸烟者更有可能表现出遗传不稳定性。然而,荟萃分析表明,吸烟者的 DNA 基因改变并不一定比不吸烟者多。
Effects of tobacco on the DNA of smokers and non-smokers affected by OSCC: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Scientific evidence about genetic and molecular changes in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) among smokers and non-smokers is inconclusive. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the effects of tobacco on the DNA of individuals with OSCC based on protein mutations. Electronic searches were conducted on PubMed, Ovid, Web of Science, and Scopus to identify observational studies published up to January/2022. The Joanna Briggs Institute tool was used for the critical appraisal of studies. The certainty of the evidence was evaluated. Twenty-three studies assessing 4,060 individuals (2,967 smokers vs. 1,093 non-smokers) were included in this review. Fifteen groups of proteins/genes were investigated. Analysis of the quality of articles revealed low risk of bias in most studies. The certainty of the evidence was very low. The meta-analysis confirmed no significant difference between smokers and non-smokers with respect to damage to GSTM1 (OR: 0.60; 95%CI: 0.30-1.18), GSTT1 (OR: 1.18; 95%CI:0.49-2.83), hydrolase proteins (Ku70 and Ku80) (OR: 0.74; 95%CI: 0.18-3.05), and transferase proteins (GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTM3) (OR: 0.74; 95%CI: 0.47-1.18). Most of the studies included showed that smokers are more likely to exhibit genetic instability. However, the meta-analysis revealed that smokers do not necessarily have more genetic alterations in the DNA than non-smokers.