个体化顺势疗法药物治疗体癣:双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Homeopathy Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1750799
Bakibillah Laskar, Swapan Paul, Abhijit Chattopadhyay, Avaranjika Karuppusamy, Dharshna Balamurugan, Puja Bhakta, Sourav Das, Siddhartha Pal, Navin Kumar Singh, Munmun Koley, Subhranil Saha
{"title":"个体化顺势疗法药物治疗体癣:双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。","authors":"Bakibillah Laskar,&nbsp;Swapan Paul,&nbsp;Abhijit Chattopadhyay,&nbsp;Avaranjika Karuppusamy,&nbsp;Dharshna Balamurugan,&nbsp;Puja Bhakta,&nbsp;Sourav Das,&nbsp;Siddhartha Pal,&nbsp;Navin Kumar Singh,&nbsp;Munmun Koley,&nbsp;Subhranil Saha","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1750799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Tinea corporis (TC; ringworm or dermatophytosis) is a superficial skin infection caused by <i>Microsporum</i>, <i>Epidermophyton</i> and <i>Trichophyton</i> genera of dermatophytes. We compared the effects of individualized homeopathic medicines (IHMs) in fifty-millesimal (LM) potencies against placebo in TC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, two parallel arms trial was conducted on 62 individuals suffering from TC at the National Institute of Homoeopathy, India. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either IHMs in LM potencies or identical-looking placebos for a period of 3 months. The primary outcome measure was the number of participants showing complete disappearance of skin lesions after 3 months. Secondary outcomes were a numeric rating scale (NRS) measuring intensity of itching and the Skindex-29 questionnaire (overall, and three sub-scales - degree of symptoms, psychological functioning, emotional status). All were assessed at baseline and every month, up to 3 months. The intention-to-treat sample was analyzed to detect inter-group differences using two-way repeated measures analysis of variance after adjusting for baseline differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary outcome revealed no improvement in either of the groups (<i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.012, <i>p</i> = 0.999). Inter-group differences in some of the secondary outcomes favored IHMs against placebo - itching NRS (mean group difference after 3 months: -0.7 (95% confidence interval [CI], -1.1 to -0.4; <i>p</i> = 0.001); Skindex-29 overall (mean group difference after 3 months: 3.2 [95% CI, -0.6 to 7.0; <i>p</i> = 0.009]); Skindex-29 degree of symptoms (mean group difference after 3 months: 0.9 [95% CI, -0.2 to 1.9; <i>p</i> = 0.007]); and Skindex-29 psychological functioning (mean group difference after 3 months: 1.7 [95% CI, 0-3.4; <i>p</i> = 0.002]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results were negative on the primary outcome; however, secondary outcomes included some statistically significant results favoring IHMs against placebo after 3 months.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>CTRI/2019/11/021999; UTN: U1111-1242-0070.</p>","PeriodicalId":13227,"journal":{"name":"Homeopathy","volume":"112 2","pages":"74-84"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Individualized Homeopathic Medicines in the Treatment of Tinea Corporis: Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Bakibillah Laskar,&nbsp;Swapan Paul,&nbsp;Abhijit Chattopadhyay,&nbsp;Avaranjika Karuppusamy,&nbsp;Dharshna Balamurugan,&nbsp;Puja Bhakta,&nbsp;Sourav Das,&nbsp;Siddhartha Pal,&nbsp;Navin Kumar Singh,&nbsp;Munmun Koley,&nbsp;Subhranil Saha\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0042-1750799\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Tinea corporis (TC; ringworm or dermatophytosis) is a superficial skin infection caused by <i>Microsporum</i>, <i>Epidermophyton</i> and <i>Trichophyton</i> genera of dermatophytes. We compared the effects of individualized homeopathic medicines (IHMs) in fifty-millesimal (LM) potencies against placebo in TC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, two parallel arms trial was conducted on 62 individuals suffering from TC at the National Institute of Homoeopathy, India. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either IHMs in LM potencies or identical-looking placebos for a period of 3 months. The primary outcome measure was the number of participants showing complete disappearance of skin lesions after 3 months. Secondary outcomes were a numeric rating scale (NRS) measuring intensity of itching and the Skindex-29 questionnaire (overall, and three sub-scales - degree of symptoms, psychological functioning, emotional status). All were assessed at baseline and every month, up to 3 months. The intention-to-treat sample was analyzed to detect inter-group differences using two-way repeated measures analysis of variance after adjusting for baseline differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary outcome revealed no improvement in either of the groups (<i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.012, <i>p</i> = 0.999). Inter-group differences in some of the secondary outcomes favored IHMs against placebo - itching NRS (mean group difference after 3 months: -0.7 (95% confidence interval [CI], -1.1 to -0.4; <i>p</i> = 0.001); Skindex-29 overall (mean group difference after 3 months: 3.2 [95% CI, -0.6 to 7.0; <i>p</i> = 0.009]); Skindex-29 degree of symptoms (mean group difference after 3 months: 0.9 [95% CI, -0.2 to 1.9; <i>p</i> = 0.007]); and Skindex-29 psychological functioning (mean group difference after 3 months: 1.7 [95% CI, 0-3.4; <i>p</i> = 0.002]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results were negative on the primary outcome; however, secondary outcomes included some statistically significant results favoring IHMs against placebo after 3 months.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>CTRI/2019/11/021999; UTN: U1111-1242-0070.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Homeopathy\",\"volume\":\"112 2\",\"pages\":\"74-84\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Homeopathy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1750799\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Homeopathy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1750799","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

简介:天癣公司(TC;癣或皮癣)是由小孢子菌、表皮菌属和毛菌属引起的浅表皮肤感染。我们比较了个体化顺势疗法药物(IHMs)与安慰剂在TC中的50千分之一效价的效果。方法:在印度国家顺势疗法研究所对62例TC患者进行双盲、随机、安慰剂对照、双平行臂试验。参与者以1:1的比例随机接受3个月的LM效力的ihm或相同外观的安慰剂。主要结果测量是3个月后皮肤病变完全消失的参与者人数。次要结果是测量瘙痒强度的数字评定量表(NRS)和skinindex -29问卷(总体,以及三个子量表-症状程度,心理功能,情绪状态)。所有患者在基线和每月进行评估,直至3个月。对意向治疗样本进行分析,在调整基线差异后,使用双向重复测量方差分析来检测组间差异。结果:两组的主要结局均无改善(χ 2 = 0.012, p = 0.999)。在一些次要结果上,组间差异更有利于IHMs与安慰剂瘙痒NRS(3个月后平均组间差异:-0.7(95%置信区间[CI], -1.1至-0.4;p = 0.001);皮肤指数-29总体(3个月后平均组差:3.2 [95% CI, -0.6至7.0;p = 0.009]);皮肤指数-29症状程度(3个月后各组平均差异:0.9 [95% CI, -0.2 ~ 1.9;p = 0.007]);和Skindex-29心理功能(3个月后各组平均差异:1.7 [95% CI, 0-3.4;p = 0.002])。结论:主要结局结果为阴性;然而,3个月后,次要结果包括一些统计学上显著的结果,ihm优于安慰剂。试验报名:CTRI/2019/11/021999;UTN: u1111 - 1242 - 0070。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Individualized Homeopathic Medicines in the Treatment of Tinea Corporis: Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Introduction: Tinea corporis (TC; ringworm or dermatophytosis) is a superficial skin infection caused by Microsporum, Epidermophyton and Trichophyton genera of dermatophytes. We compared the effects of individualized homeopathic medicines (IHMs) in fifty-millesimal (LM) potencies against placebo in TC.

Methods: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, two parallel arms trial was conducted on 62 individuals suffering from TC at the National Institute of Homoeopathy, India. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either IHMs in LM potencies or identical-looking placebos for a period of 3 months. The primary outcome measure was the number of participants showing complete disappearance of skin lesions after 3 months. Secondary outcomes were a numeric rating scale (NRS) measuring intensity of itching and the Skindex-29 questionnaire (overall, and three sub-scales - degree of symptoms, psychological functioning, emotional status). All were assessed at baseline and every month, up to 3 months. The intention-to-treat sample was analyzed to detect inter-group differences using two-way repeated measures analysis of variance after adjusting for baseline differences.

Results: The primary outcome revealed no improvement in either of the groups (χ 2 = 0.012, p = 0.999). Inter-group differences in some of the secondary outcomes favored IHMs against placebo - itching NRS (mean group difference after 3 months: -0.7 (95% confidence interval [CI], -1.1 to -0.4; p = 0.001); Skindex-29 overall (mean group difference after 3 months: 3.2 [95% CI, -0.6 to 7.0; p = 0.009]); Skindex-29 degree of symptoms (mean group difference after 3 months: 0.9 [95% CI, -0.2 to 1.9; p = 0.007]); and Skindex-29 psychological functioning (mean group difference after 3 months: 1.7 [95% CI, 0-3.4; p = 0.002]).

Conclusion: Results were negative on the primary outcome; however, secondary outcomes included some statistically significant results favoring IHMs against placebo after 3 months.

Trial registration: CTRI/2019/11/021999; UTN: U1111-1242-0070.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Homeopathy
Homeopathy 医学-全科医学与补充医学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
70.60%
发文量
34
审稿时长
20.1 weeks
期刊介绍: Homeopathy is an international peer-reviewed journal aimed at improving the fundamental understanding and clinical practice of homeopathy by publishing relevant high-quality original research articles, reviews, and case reports. It also promotes commentary and debate on matters of topical interest in homeopathy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信