与保守治疗相比,机械取栓与更短的住院时间和更低的再入院率相关:倾向匹配分析。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Diagnostic and interventional radiology Pub Date : 2023-11-07 Epub Date: 2023-03-24 DOI:10.4274/dir.2022.221622
Zain M Khazi, Justin Pierce, Shahrzad Azizaddini, Ryan Davis, Ambarish P Bhat
{"title":"与保守治疗相比,机械取栓与更短的住院时间和更低的再入院率相关:倾向匹配分析。","authors":"Zain M Khazi, Justin Pierce, Shahrzad Azizaddini, Ryan Davis, Ambarish P Bhat","doi":"10.4274/dir.2022.221622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine if mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for submassive pulmonary embolism (PE) positively impacts length of hospital stay (LOS), intensive care unit stay (ICU LOS), readmission rate, and in-hospital mortality compared with conservative therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective review of all patients with submassive PE who either underwent MT or conservative therapy (systemic anticoagulation and/or inferior vena cava filter) between November 2019 and October 2021. Pediatric patients (age <18) and those with low-risk and massive PEs were excluded from the study. Patient characteristics, comorbidities, vitals, laboratory values (cardiac biomarkers, hospital course, readmission rates, and in-hospital mortality) were recorded. A 2:1 propensity score match was performed on the conservative and MT cohorts based on age and the PE severity index (PESI) classification. Fischer's exact test, Pearson's χ2 test, and Student's t-tests were used to compare patient demographics, comorbidities, LOS, ICU LOS, readmission rates, and mortality rates, with statistical significance defined as <i>P</i> < 0.05. Additionally, a subgroup analysis based on PESI scores was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After matching, 123 patients were analyzed in the study, 41 in the MT cohort and 82 in the conservative therapy cohort. There was no significant difference in patient demographics, comorbidities, or PESI classification between the cohorts, except for increased incidence of obesity in the MT cohort (<i>P</i> = 0.013). Patients in the MT cohort had a significantly shorter LOS compared with the conservative therapy cohort (5.37 ± 3.93 vs. 7.76 ± 9.53 days, <i>P</i> = 0.028). However, ICU LOS was not significantly different between the cohorts (2.34 ± 2.25 vs. 3.33 ± 4.49, <i>P</i> = 0.059). There was no significant difference for in-hospital mortality (7.31% vs. 12.2%, <i>P</i> = 0.411). Of those that were discharged from the hospital, there was significantly lower incidence of 30-day readmission in the MT cohort (5.26% vs. 26.4%, <i>P</i> < 0.001). A subgroup analysis did not demonstrate that the PESI score had a significant impact on LOS, ICU LOS, readmission, or in-hospital mortality rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MT for submassive PE can reduce the total LOS and 30-day readmission rates compared with conservative therapy. However, in-hospital mortality and ICU LOS were not significantly different between the two groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":11341,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and interventional radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10679557/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mechanical thrombectomy is associated with shorter length of hospital stay and lower readmission rates compared with conservative therapy for acute submassive pulmonary embolism: a propensity-matched analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Zain M Khazi, Justin Pierce, Shahrzad Azizaddini, Ryan Davis, Ambarish P Bhat\",\"doi\":\"10.4274/dir.2022.221622\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine if mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for submassive pulmonary embolism (PE) positively impacts length of hospital stay (LOS), intensive care unit stay (ICU LOS), readmission rate, and in-hospital mortality compared with conservative therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective review of all patients with submassive PE who either underwent MT or conservative therapy (systemic anticoagulation and/or inferior vena cava filter) between November 2019 and October 2021. Pediatric patients (age <18) and those with low-risk and massive PEs were excluded from the study. Patient characteristics, comorbidities, vitals, laboratory values (cardiac biomarkers, hospital course, readmission rates, and in-hospital mortality) were recorded. A 2:1 propensity score match was performed on the conservative and MT cohorts based on age and the PE severity index (PESI) classification. Fischer's exact test, Pearson's χ2 test, and Student's t-tests were used to compare patient demographics, comorbidities, LOS, ICU LOS, readmission rates, and mortality rates, with statistical significance defined as <i>P</i> < 0.05. Additionally, a subgroup analysis based on PESI scores was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After matching, 123 patients were analyzed in the study, 41 in the MT cohort and 82 in the conservative therapy cohort. There was no significant difference in patient demographics, comorbidities, or PESI classification between the cohorts, except for increased incidence of obesity in the MT cohort (<i>P</i> = 0.013). Patients in the MT cohort had a significantly shorter LOS compared with the conservative therapy cohort (5.37 ± 3.93 vs. 7.76 ± 9.53 days, <i>P</i> = 0.028). However, ICU LOS was not significantly different between the cohorts (2.34 ± 2.25 vs. 3.33 ± 4.49, <i>P</i> = 0.059). There was no significant difference for in-hospital mortality (7.31% vs. 12.2%, <i>P</i> = 0.411). Of those that were discharged from the hospital, there was significantly lower incidence of 30-day readmission in the MT cohort (5.26% vs. 26.4%, <i>P</i> < 0.001). A subgroup analysis did not demonstrate that the PESI score had a significant impact on LOS, ICU LOS, readmission, or in-hospital mortality rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MT for submassive PE can reduce the total LOS and 30-day readmission rates compared with conservative therapy. However, in-hospital mortality and ICU LOS were not significantly different between the two groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostic and interventional radiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10679557/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostic and interventional radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4274/dir.2022.221622\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/3/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic and interventional radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/dir.2022.221622","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定与保守治疗相比,机械血栓切除术(MT)治疗亚大块肺栓塞(PE)是否对住院时间(LOS)、重症监护室住院时间(ICU LOS),再入院率和住院死亡率有积极影响。方法:这是对2019年11月至2021年10月期间接受MT或保守治疗(全身抗凝和/或下腔静脉滤器)的所有亚重度PE患者的回顾性审查。儿科患者(年龄P<0.05。此外,还评估了基于PESI评分的亚组分析。结果:配对后,123名患者在研究中进行了分析,41名在MT队列中,82名在保守治疗队列中。除了MT队列中肥胖发生率增加(P=0.013)外,各队列之间的患者人口统计学、合并症或PESI分类没有显著差异。与保守治疗队列相比,MT队列中的患者LOS显著缩短(5.37±3.93 vs.7.76±9.53天,P=0.028)。然而,两组患者的ICU LOS差异无统计学意义(2.34±2.25 vs.3.33±4.49,P=0.059)。住院死亡率差异无统计学价值(7.31%vs.12.2%,P=0.0411),MT队列中30天再次入院的发生率显著较低(5.26%对26.4%,P<0.001)。亚组分析没有表明PESI评分对LOS、ICU LOS、再次入院或住院死亡率有显著影响。结论:与保守治疗相比,MT治疗亚重度PE可降低总LOS和30天再入院率。然而,两组患者的住院死亡率和ICU LOS没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mechanical thrombectomy is associated with shorter length of hospital stay and lower readmission rates compared with conservative therapy for acute submassive pulmonary embolism: a propensity-matched analysis.

Purpose: To determine if mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for submassive pulmonary embolism (PE) positively impacts length of hospital stay (LOS), intensive care unit stay (ICU LOS), readmission rate, and in-hospital mortality compared with conservative therapy.

Methods: This was a retrospective review of all patients with submassive PE who either underwent MT or conservative therapy (systemic anticoagulation and/or inferior vena cava filter) between November 2019 and October 2021. Pediatric patients (age <18) and those with low-risk and massive PEs were excluded from the study. Patient characteristics, comorbidities, vitals, laboratory values (cardiac biomarkers, hospital course, readmission rates, and in-hospital mortality) were recorded. A 2:1 propensity score match was performed on the conservative and MT cohorts based on age and the PE severity index (PESI) classification. Fischer's exact test, Pearson's χ2 test, and Student's t-tests were used to compare patient demographics, comorbidities, LOS, ICU LOS, readmission rates, and mortality rates, with statistical significance defined as P < 0.05. Additionally, a subgroup analysis based on PESI scores was assessed.

Results: After matching, 123 patients were analyzed in the study, 41 in the MT cohort and 82 in the conservative therapy cohort. There was no significant difference in patient demographics, comorbidities, or PESI classification between the cohorts, except for increased incidence of obesity in the MT cohort (P = 0.013). Patients in the MT cohort had a significantly shorter LOS compared with the conservative therapy cohort (5.37 ± 3.93 vs. 7.76 ± 9.53 days, P = 0.028). However, ICU LOS was not significantly different between the cohorts (2.34 ± 2.25 vs. 3.33 ± 4.49, P = 0.059). There was no significant difference for in-hospital mortality (7.31% vs. 12.2%, P = 0.411). Of those that were discharged from the hospital, there was significantly lower incidence of 30-day readmission in the MT cohort (5.26% vs. 26.4%, P < 0.001). A subgroup analysis did not demonstrate that the PESI score had a significant impact on LOS, ICU LOS, readmission, or in-hospital mortality rates.

Conclusion: MT for submassive PE can reduce the total LOS and 30-day readmission rates compared with conservative therapy. However, in-hospital mortality and ICU LOS were not significantly different between the two groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnostic and interventional radiology
Diagnostic and interventional radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
自引率
4.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (Diagn Interv Radiol) is the open access, online-only official publication of Turkish Society of Radiology. It is published bimonthly and the journal’s publication language is English. The journal is a medium for original articles, reviews, pictorial essays, technical notes related to all fields of diagnostic and interventional radiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信