脓毒症评分对预测体外膜肺氧合中血流感染的实用性。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Perfusion-Uk Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-29 DOI:10.1177/02676591231168644
Daniel G Lee, Michal J Sobieszczyk, Alice E Barsoumian, Joseph E Marcus
{"title":"脓毒症评分对预测体外膜肺氧合中血流感染的实用性。","authors":"Daniel G Lee, Michal J Sobieszczyk, Alice E Barsoumian, Joseph E Marcus","doi":"10.1177/02676591231168644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is an increasingly used modality of life support with high risk for nosocomial infections. The accuracy of sepsis prediction tools in identifying blood stream infections (BSI) in this population is unknown as measurement of multiple variables commonly associated with infection are altered by the circuit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study compares all blood stream infections for patients receiving ECMO between January 2012 and December 2020 to timepoints when blood cultures were negative using the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), Logistic Organ Dysfunction Score (LODS), American Burn Association Sepsis Criteria (ABA), Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 220 patients who received ECMO during the study period, 40 (18%) had 51 blood stream infections and were included in this study. Gram-positive infections composed 57% (<i>n</i> = 29) of infections with <i>E. faecalis</i> (<i>n</i> = 12, 24%) being the most common organism isolated. There were no significant differences in sepsis prediction scores at the time of infection compared to infection-free time points for SOFA (median (IQR) 7 (5-9) vs. 6 (5-8), <i>p</i> = 0.22), LODS (median (IQR) 12 (10-14) vs. 12 (10-13), <i>p</i> = 0.28), ABA (median (IQR) 2 (1-3) vs. 2 (1-3) <i>p</i> = 0.75), or SIRS (median (IQR) 3 (2-3) vs. 3 (2-3), <i>p</i> = 0.20).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data shows that previously published sepsis scores are elevated throughout a patient's ECMO course, and do not correlate with bacteremia. Better predictive tools are needed to determine the appropriate timing for blood cultures in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":49707,"journal":{"name":"Perfusion-Uk","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The utility of sepsis scores for predicting blood stream infections in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel G Lee, Michal J Sobieszczyk, Alice E Barsoumian, Joseph E Marcus\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02676591231168644\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is an increasingly used modality of life support with high risk for nosocomial infections. The accuracy of sepsis prediction tools in identifying blood stream infections (BSI) in this population is unknown as measurement of multiple variables commonly associated with infection are altered by the circuit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study compares all blood stream infections for patients receiving ECMO between January 2012 and December 2020 to timepoints when blood cultures were negative using the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), Logistic Organ Dysfunction Score (LODS), American Burn Association Sepsis Criteria (ABA), Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 220 patients who received ECMO during the study period, 40 (18%) had 51 blood stream infections and were included in this study. Gram-positive infections composed 57% (<i>n</i> = 29) of infections with <i>E. faecalis</i> (<i>n</i> = 12, 24%) being the most common organism isolated. There were no significant differences in sepsis prediction scores at the time of infection compared to infection-free time points for SOFA (median (IQR) 7 (5-9) vs. 6 (5-8), <i>p</i> = 0.22), LODS (median (IQR) 12 (10-14) vs. 12 (10-13), <i>p</i> = 0.28), ABA (median (IQR) 2 (1-3) vs. 2 (1-3) <i>p</i> = 0.75), or SIRS (median (IQR) 3 (2-3) vs. 3 (2-3), <i>p</i> = 0.20).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data shows that previously published sepsis scores are elevated throughout a patient's ECMO course, and do not correlate with bacteremia. Better predictive tools are needed to determine the appropriate timing for blood cultures in this population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perfusion-Uk\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perfusion-Uk\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02676591231168644\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/3/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perfusion-Uk","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02676591231168644","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)是一种应用日益广泛的生命支持方式,具有很高的院内感染风险。脓毒症预测工具在识别该人群血流感染(BSI)方面的准确性尚不清楚,因为通常与感染相关的多个变量的测量会因回路而改变:本研究比较了 2012 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间接受 ECMO 患者的所有血流感染情况,以及使用序贯器官功能衰竭评估 (SOFA)、逻辑器官功能障碍评分 (LODS)、美国烧伤协会败血症标准 (ABA)、全身炎症反应综合征 (SIRS) 评分对血培养结果呈阴性的时间点:在研究期间接受 ECMO 的 220 名患者中,有 40 人(18%)发生 51 例血流感染,并被纳入本研究。革兰氏阳性感染占感染总数的 57%(n = 29),其中粪大肠杆菌(n = 12,24%)是最常见的分离菌。与无感染时间点相比,感染时的脓毒症预测评分在 SOFA(中位数(IQR)7 (5-9) vs. 6 (5-8),P = 0.22)、LODS(中位数(IQR)12(10-14) vs. 12(10-13),p = 0.28)、ABA(中位数(IQR)2(1-3) vs. 2(1-3),p = 0.75)或 SIRS(中位数(IQR)3(2-3) vs. 3(2-3),p = 0.20):我们的数据显示,之前公布的败血症评分在患者的整个 ECMO 疗程中都会升高,且与菌血症无关。需要更好的预测工具来确定在这一人群中进行血液培养的适当时机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The utility of sepsis scores for predicting blood stream infections in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Introduction: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is an increasingly used modality of life support with high risk for nosocomial infections. The accuracy of sepsis prediction tools in identifying blood stream infections (BSI) in this population is unknown as measurement of multiple variables commonly associated with infection are altered by the circuit.

Methods: This study compares all blood stream infections for patients receiving ECMO between January 2012 and December 2020 to timepoints when blood cultures were negative using the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), Logistic Organ Dysfunction Score (LODS), American Burn Association Sepsis Criteria (ABA), Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) scores.

Results: Of the 220 patients who received ECMO during the study period, 40 (18%) had 51 blood stream infections and were included in this study. Gram-positive infections composed 57% (n = 29) of infections with E. faecalis (n = 12, 24%) being the most common organism isolated. There were no significant differences in sepsis prediction scores at the time of infection compared to infection-free time points for SOFA (median (IQR) 7 (5-9) vs. 6 (5-8), p = 0.22), LODS (median (IQR) 12 (10-14) vs. 12 (10-13), p = 0.28), ABA (median (IQR) 2 (1-3) vs. 2 (1-3) p = 0.75), or SIRS (median (IQR) 3 (2-3) vs. 3 (2-3), p = 0.20).

Conclusions: Our data shows that previously published sepsis scores are elevated throughout a patient's ECMO course, and do not correlate with bacteremia. Better predictive tools are needed to determine the appropriate timing for blood cultures in this population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Perfusion-Uk
Perfusion-Uk 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Perfusion is an ISI-ranked, peer-reviewed scholarly journal, which provides current information on all aspects of perfusion, oxygenation and biocompatibility and their use in modern cardiac surgery. The journal is at the forefront of international research and development and presents an appropriately multidisciplinary approach to perfusion science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信