体内挥发性麻醉剂单独或与 1 和 2 Gy 伽马射线照射相结合对小鼠肝脏 DNA 的不同破坏作用:一项初步研究。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Vesna Benković, Mirta Milić, Nada Oršolić, Anica Horvat Knežević, Gordana Brozović, Nikola Borojević
{"title":"体内挥发性麻醉剂单独或与 1 和 2 Gy 伽马射线照射相结合对小鼠肝脏 DNA 的不同破坏作用:一项初步研究。","authors":"Vesna Benković, Mirta Milić, Nada Oršolić, Anica Horvat Knežević, Gordana Brozović, Nikola Borojević","doi":"10.2478/aiht-2023-74-3692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As the number of radiotherapy and radiology diagnostic procedures increases from year to year, so does the use of general volatile anaesthesia (VA). Although considered safe, VA exposure can cause different adverse effects and, in combination with ionising radiation (IR), can also cause synergistic effects. However, little is known about DNA damage incurred by this combination at doses applied in a single radiotherapy treatment. To learn more about it, we assessed DNA damage and repair response in the liver tissue of Swiss albino male mice following exposure to isoflurane (I), sevoflurane (S), or halothane (H) alone or in combination with 1 or 2 Gy irradiation using the comet assay. Samples were taken immediately (0 h) and 2, 6, and 24 h after exposure. Compared to control, the highest DNA damage was found in mice receiving halothane alone or in combination with 1 or 2 Gy IR treatments. Sevoflurane and isoflurane displayed protective effects against 1 Gy IR, while with 2 Gy IR the first adverse effects appeared at 24 h post-exposure. Although VA effects depend on liver metabolism, the detection of unrepaired DNA damage 24 h after combined exposure with 2 Gy IR indicates that we need to look further into the combined effects of VA and IR on genome stability and include a longer time frame than 24 h for single exposure as well as repeated exposure as a more realistic scenario in radiotherapy treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":55462,"journal":{"name":"Arhiv Za Higijenu Rada I Toksikologiju-Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology","volume":"74 1","pages":"22-33"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/37/be/aiht-74-1-aiht-2023-74-3692.PMC10231891.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Different damaging effects of volatile anaesthetics alone or in combination with 1 and 2 Gy gamma-irradiation <i>in vivo</i> on mouse liver DNA: a preliminary study.\",\"authors\":\"Vesna Benković, Mirta Milić, Nada Oršolić, Anica Horvat Knežević, Gordana Brozović, Nikola Borojević\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/aiht-2023-74-3692\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>As the number of radiotherapy and radiology diagnostic procedures increases from year to year, so does the use of general volatile anaesthesia (VA). Although considered safe, VA exposure can cause different adverse effects and, in combination with ionising radiation (IR), can also cause synergistic effects. However, little is known about DNA damage incurred by this combination at doses applied in a single radiotherapy treatment. To learn more about it, we assessed DNA damage and repair response in the liver tissue of Swiss albino male mice following exposure to isoflurane (I), sevoflurane (S), or halothane (H) alone or in combination with 1 or 2 Gy irradiation using the comet assay. Samples were taken immediately (0 h) and 2, 6, and 24 h after exposure. Compared to control, the highest DNA damage was found in mice receiving halothane alone or in combination with 1 or 2 Gy IR treatments. Sevoflurane and isoflurane displayed protective effects against 1 Gy IR, while with 2 Gy IR the first adverse effects appeared at 24 h post-exposure. Although VA effects depend on liver metabolism, the detection of unrepaired DNA damage 24 h after combined exposure with 2 Gy IR indicates that we need to look further into the combined effects of VA and IR on genome stability and include a longer time frame than 24 h for single exposure as well as repeated exposure as a more realistic scenario in radiotherapy treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arhiv Za Higijenu Rada I Toksikologiju-Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"22-33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/37/be/aiht-74-1-aiht-2023-74-3692.PMC10231891.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arhiv Za Higijenu Rada I Toksikologiju-Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/aiht-2023-74-3692\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arhiv Za Higijenu Rada I Toksikologiju-Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/aiht-2023-74-3692","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着放射治疗和放射诊断程序数量的逐年增加,全身挥发性麻醉(VA)的使用也在增加。尽管挥发性麻醉被认为是安全的,但它的暴露会导致不同的不良反应,与电离辐射(IR)结合使用时还会产生协同效应。然而,人们对在单次放疗中使用这种组合剂量所造成的 DNA 损伤知之甚少。为了了解更多相关信息,我们使用彗星试验评估了瑞士白化雄性小鼠在单独或与 1 或 2 Gy 照射结合使用异氟醚(I)、七氟醚(S)或氟烷(H)后肝组织中的 DNA 损伤和修复反应。在照射后立即(0 小时)、2、6 和 24 小时取样。与对照组相比,单独接受氟烷或同时接受 1 或 2 Gy IR 照射的小鼠 DNA 损伤最高。七氟醚和异氟醚对1 Gy IR有保护作用,而对2 Gy IR的不利影响则出现在暴露后24小时。虽然VA的影响取决于肝脏的新陈代谢,但在与2 Gy红外联合照射24小时后检测到未修复的DNA损伤表明,我们需要进一步研究VA和红外对基因组稳定性的联合影响,并将单次照射和重复照射的时间范围从24小时延长到更长的时间范围,从而使放射治疗的情况更符合实际。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Different damaging effects of volatile anaesthetics alone or in combination with 1 and 2 Gy gamma-irradiation <i>in vivo</i> on mouse liver DNA: a preliminary study.

Different damaging effects of volatile anaesthetics alone or in combination with 1 and 2 Gy gamma-irradiation <i>in vivo</i> on mouse liver DNA: a preliminary study.

Different damaging effects of volatile anaesthetics alone or in combination with 1 and 2 Gy gamma-irradiation <i>in vivo</i> on mouse liver DNA: a preliminary study.

Different damaging effects of volatile anaesthetics alone or in combination with 1 and 2 Gy gamma-irradiation in vivo on mouse liver DNA: a preliminary study.

As the number of radiotherapy and radiology diagnostic procedures increases from year to year, so does the use of general volatile anaesthesia (VA). Although considered safe, VA exposure can cause different adverse effects and, in combination with ionising radiation (IR), can also cause synergistic effects. However, little is known about DNA damage incurred by this combination at doses applied in a single radiotherapy treatment. To learn more about it, we assessed DNA damage and repair response in the liver tissue of Swiss albino male mice following exposure to isoflurane (I), sevoflurane (S), or halothane (H) alone or in combination with 1 or 2 Gy irradiation using the comet assay. Samples were taken immediately (0 h) and 2, 6, and 24 h after exposure. Compared to control, the highest DNA damage was found in mice receiving halothane alone or in combination with 1 or 2 Gy IR treatments. Sevoflurane and isoflurane displayed protective effects against 1 Gy IR, while with 2 Gy IR the first adverse effects appeared at 24 h post-exposure. Although VA effects depend on liver metabolism, the detection of unrepaired DNA damage 24 h after combined exposure with 2 Gy IR indicates that we need to look further into the combined effects of VA and IR on genome stability and include a longer time frame than 24 h for single exposure as well as repeated exposure as a more realistic scenario in radiotherapy treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arhiv Za Higijenu Rada I Toksikologiju-Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology
Arhiv Za Higijenu Rada I Toksikologiju-Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-TOXICOLOGY
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
26
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology (abbr. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol) is a peer-reviewed biomedical scientific quarterly that publishes contributions relevant to all aspects of environmental and occupational health and toxicology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信