一种评估家长对儿童牙科局部麻醉技术满意度的新量表:一项横断面研究。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Muaaz Alkhouli, Zuhair Al-Nerabieah, Mayssoon Dashash
{"title":"一种评估家长对儿童牙科局部麻醉技术满意度的新量表:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Muaaz Alkhouli,&nbsp;Zuhair Al-Nerabieah,&nbsp;Mayssoon Dashash","doi":"10.1155/2023/9973749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pain control is one of the most important aspects that can affect parental satisfaction of the dental care provided for children. Dental local anesthesia has the highest impact on pain sensation of the children. However, there is no scale in the literature to assess parental satisfaction of dental local anesthetic techniques.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study was aimed to assess the parental satisfaction with dental local anesthetic techniques for their children through designing a scale that reflects satisfaction and to study the validity and reliability of this scale.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional observational study was conducted on 150 parents (102 mothers and 48 fathers). Two techniques of local anesthesia were used for each child participated in this study (inferior alveolar nerve block and computerized intraosseous anesthesia). The developed scale consisted of 20 items in a 5-point Likert scale. Half of the items were written in a negative format. Internal consistency, validity, and factor analysis were performed in this study. Independent <i>t</i>-test was used to compare between the two techniques of anesthesia, between boys and girls and among fathers and mothers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Parental satisfaction mean values were higher in the computerized intraosseous anesthesia group in comparison to inferior alveolar nerve block (<i>P</i> value <0.05). The <i>T</i>-test showed that there was no difference between boys and girls regarding parental satisfaction (<i>P</i> value >0.05). Furthermore, fathers show lower satisfaction in the computerized interosseous anesthesia group (<i>P</i> value <0.05). Excellent internal consistency of this scale was resulted as Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient was 0.985. After factor analysis, seven factor components were retained by using varimax rotation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings of this study reported that the designed parental satisfaction of dental local anesthetic techniques scale (PSLAS) is a valid and reliable scale to be used. Moreover, this study showed that parental satisfaction was higher when computerized intraosseous anesthesia was used in comparison to inferior alveolar nerve block.</p>","PeriodicalId":19913,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research & Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10219770/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Novel Scale to Assess Parental Satisfaction of Dental Local Anesthetic Techniques in Children: A Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Muaaz Alkhouli,&nbsp;Zuhair Al-Nerabieah,&nbsp;Mayssoon Dashash\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2023/9973749\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pain control is one of the most important aspects that can affect parental satisfaction of the dental care provided for children. Dental local anesthesia has the highest impact on pain sensation of the children. However, there is no scale in the literature to assess parental satisfaction of dental local anesthetic techniques.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study was aimed to assess the parental satisfaction with dental local anesthetic techniques for their children through designing a scale that reflects satisfaction and to study the validity and reliability of this scale.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional observational study was conducted on 150 parents (102 mothers and 48 fathers). Two techniques of local anesthesia were used for each child participated in this study (inferior alveolar nerve block and computerized intraosseous anesthesia). The developed scale consisted of 20 items in a 5-point Likert scale. Half of the items were written in a negative format. Internal consistency, validity, and factor analysis were performed in this study. Independent <i>t</i>-test was used to compare between the two techniques of anesthesia, between boys and girls and among fathers and mothers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Parental satisfaction mean values were higher in the computerized intraosseous anesthesia group in comparison to inferior alveolar nerve block (<i>P</i> value <0.05). The <i>T</i>-test showed that there was no difference between boys and girls regarding parental satisfaction (<i>P</i> value >0.05). Furthermore, fathers show lower satisfaction in the computerized interosseous anesthesia group (<i>P</i> value <0.05). Excellent internal consistency of this scale was resulted as Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient was 0.985. After factor analysis, seven factor components were retained by using varimax rotation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings of this study reported that the designed parental satisfaction of dental local anesthetic techniques scale (PSLAS) is a valid and reliable scale to be used. Moreover, this study showed that parental satisfaction was higher when computerized intraosseous anesthesia was used in comparison to inferior alveolar nerve block.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain Research & Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10219770/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain Research & Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/9973749\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Research & Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/9973749","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:疼痛控制是影响父母对儿童牙科护理满意度的最重要方面之一。牙科局部麻醉对儿童疼痛感觉的影响最大。然而,在文献中没有量表来评估父母对牙科局部麻醉技术的满意度。目的:本研究旨在通过设计一份反映儿童牙科局部麻醉技术满意度的量表,来评估家长对儿童牙科局部麻醉技术的满意度,并研究该量表的效度和信度。方法:对150名家长(102名母亲和48名父亲)进行横断面观察研究。本研究对每个患儿采用两种局部麻醉技术(下牙槽神经阻滞和计算机化骨内麻醉)。该量表采用李克特5分制,包括20个项目。一半的题目是用否定的形式写的。本研究进行内部一致性、效度及因子分析。采用独立t检验比较两种麻醉方法之间、男孩和女孩之间以及父亲和母亲之间的差异。结果:计算机化骨内麻醉组家长满意度均值高于下牙槽神经阻滞组(P值t检验显示男女家长满意度无显著差异(P值>0.05)。结论:本研究结果表明,设计的口腔局麻技术家长满意度量表(PSLAS)是一份有效、可靠的可应用的量表。此外,本研究显示,与下牙槽神经阻滞相比,采用计算机化骨内麻醉的家长满意度更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Novel Scale to Assess Parental Satisfaction of Dental Local Anesthetic Techniques in Children: A Cross-Sectional Study.

A Novel Scale to Assess Parental Satisfaction of Dental Local Anesthetic Techniques in Children: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Background: Pain control is one of the most important aspects that can affect parental satisfaction of the dental care provided for children. Dental local anesthesia has the highest impact on pain sensation of the children. However, there is no scale in the literature to assess parental satisfaction of dental local anesthetic techniques.

Objectives: This study was aimed to assess the parental satisfaction with dental local anesthetic techniques for their children through designing a scale that reflects satisfaction and to study the validity and reliability of this scale.

Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted on 150 parents (102 mothers and 48 fathers). Two techniques of local anesthesia were used for each child participated in this study (inferior alveolar nerve block and computerized intraosseous anesthesia). The developed scale consisted of 20 items in a 5-point Likert scale. Half of the items were written in a negative format. Internal consistency, validity, and factor analysis were performed in this study. Independent t-test was used to compare between the two techniques of anesthesia, between boys and girls and among fathers and mothers.

Results: Parental satisfaction mean values were higher in the computerized intraosseous anesthesia group in comparison to inferior alveolar nerve block (P value <0.05). The T-test showed that there was no difference between boys and girls regarding parental satisfaction (P value >0.05). Furthermore, fathers show lower satisfaction in the computerized interosseous anesthesia group (P value <0.05). Excellent internal consistency of this scale was resulted as Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient was 0.985. After factor analysis, seven factor components were retained by using varimax rotation.

Conclusions: Findings of this study reported that the designed parental satisfaction of dental local anesthetic techniques scale (PSLAS) is a valid and reliable scale to be used. Moreover, this study showed that parental satisfaction was higher when computerized intraosseous anesthesia was used in comparison to inferior alveolar nerve block.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Research & Management
Pain Research & Management CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pain Research and Management is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of pain management. The most recent Impact Factor for Pain Research and Management is 1.685 according to the 2015 Journal Citation Reports released by Thomson Reuters in 2016.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信