压力和愉快的社交互动后消极和积极的事件后处理的回顾性研究

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Leanne Kane, Olivia Simioni, Andrea R. Ashbaugh
{"title":"压力和愉快的社交互动后消极和积极的事件后处理的回顾性研究","authors":"Leanne Kane,&nbsp;Olivia Simioni,&nbsp;Andrea R. Ashbaugh","doi":"10.1016/j.jbtep.2022.101795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><p>Negative post-event processing (PEP) is a key maintenance factor of social anxiety, but little is known about the role positive PEP, particularly in relation to situations that are not perceived as stressful. The objective was to examine negative and positive PEP following stressful and pleasant social interactions. We were also interested in how participants remembered and described the interactions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Young adults (<em>n</em> = 411) recalled a recent pleasant or stressful social interaction and indicated how much negative and positive PEP they engaged in since the interaction. They also completed questionnaires measuring social anxiety and the memory's phenomenological qualities and wrote a description of the interaction.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Higher social anxiety was linked with more negative and less positive PEP, regardless of whether the interaction was perceived as stressful or pleasant. Participants reporting more negative PEP used more negative words in describing the interaction and their memory was more negative and emotionally intense. Those reporting more positive PEP used more positive and less negative words in their descriptions. For stressful interactions, positive PEP was related to a more positive memory; for pleasant ones, it was related to increased emotional intensity.</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>Limitations included the sample type (restricted age range, non-clinical) and the retrospective, cross-sectional nature of the study.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Results provide insight into PEP following stressful and pleasant social interactions. We also found preliminary evidence that positive PEP may be helpful and protective. Future studies may benefit from longitudinal and mixed methods designs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48198,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry","volume":"80 ","pages":"Article 101795"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A retrospective study of negative and positive post-event processing following stressful and pleasant social interactions\",\"authors\":\"Leanne Kane,&nbsp;Olivia Simioni,&nbsp;Andrea R. Ashbaugh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbtep.2022.101795\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><p>Negative post-event processing (PEP) is a key maintenance factor of social anxiety, but little is known about the role positive PEP, particularly in relation to situations that are not perceived as stressful. The objective was to examine negative and positive PEP following stressful and pleasant social interactions. We were also interested in how participants remembered and described the interactions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Young adults (<em>n</em> = 411) recalled a recent pleasant or stressful social interaction and indicated how much negative and positive PEP they engaged in since the interaction. They also completed questionnaires measuring social anxiety and the memory's phenomenological qualities and wrote a description of the interaction.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Higher social anxiety was linked with more negative and less positive PEP, regardless of whether the interaction was perceived as stressful or pleasant. Participants reporting more negative PEP used more negative words in describing the interaction and their memory was more negative and emotionally intense. Those reporting more positive PEP used more positive and less negative words in their descriptions. For stressful interactions, positive PEP was related to a more positive memory; for pleasant ones, it was related to increased emotional intensity.</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>Limitations included the sample type (restricted age range, non-clinical) and the retrospective, cross-sectional nature of the study.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Results provide insight into PEP following stressful and pleasant social interactions. We also found preliminary evidence that positive PEP may be helpful and protective. Future studies may benefit from longitudinal and mixed methods designs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48198,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"80 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101795\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005791622000738\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005791622000738","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景和目的负面事件后处理(PEP)是社交焦虑的一个关键维持因素,但人们对正面事件后处理的作用知之甚少,尤其是在不被认为有压力的情况下。目的是检查在压力和愉快的社交互动之后的消极和积极的政治公众人物。我们还对参与者如何记忆和描述互动感兴趣。方法411名年轻人回忆起最近一次愉快或紧张的社交互动,并指出自互动以来他们参与了多少消极和积极的政治公众人物。他们还完成了测量社交焦虑和记忆现象学品质的问卷调查,并对这种互动进行了描述。结果无论互动是紧张还是愉快,较高的社交焦虑与较多的消极和较少的积极政治公众人物有关。报告更多负面政治公众人物的参与者在描述互动时使用了更多负面词汇,他们的记忆更负面,情绪更强烈。那些报告政治公众人物更积极的人在描述中使用了更多积极而更少消极的词语。对于压力互动,积极的政治公众人物与更积极的记忆有关;对于愉快的人来说,这与情绪强度的增加有关。局限性局限性包括样本类型(受限制的年龄范围,非临床)和研究的回顾性、横断面性质。结论这些结果提供了对压力和愉快的社交互动后的政治公众人物的深入了解。我们还发现初步证据表明,阳性PEP可能有帮助和保护作用。未来的研究可能受益于纵向和混合方法设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A retrospective study of negative and positive post-event processing following stressful and pleasant social interactions

Background and objectives

Negative post-event processing (PEP) is a key maintenance factor of social anxiety, but little is known about the role positive PEP, particularly in relation to situations that are not perceived as stressful. The objective was to examine negative and positive PEP following stressful and pleasant social interactions. We were also interested in how participants remembered and described the interactions.

Methods

Young adults (n = 411) recalled a recent pleasant or stressful social interaction and indicated how much negative and positive PEP they engaged in since the interaction. They also completed questionnaires measuring social anxiety and the memory's phenomenological qualities and wrote a description of the interaction.

Results

Higher social anxiety was linked with more negative and less positive PEP, regardless of whether the interaction was perceived as stressful or pleasant. Participants reporting more negative PEP used more negative words in describing the interaction and their memory was more negative and emotionally intense. Those reporting more positive PEP used more positive and less negative words in their descriptions. For stressful interactions, positive PEP was related to a more positive memory; for pleasant ones, it was related to increased emotional intensity.

Limitations

Limitations included the sample type (restricted age range, non-clinical) and the retrospective, cross-sectional nature of the study.

Conclusions

Results provide insight into PEP following stressful and pleasant social interactions. We also found preliminary evidence that positive PEP may be helpful and protective. Future studies may benefit from longitudinal and mixed methods designs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: The publication of the book Psychotherapy by Reciprocal Inhibition (1958) by the co-founding editor of this Journal, Joseph Wolpe, marked a major change in the understanding and treatment of mental disorders. The book used principles from empirical behavioral science to explain psychopathological phenomena and the resulting explanations were critically tested and used to derive effective treatments. The second half of the 20th century saw this rigorous scientific approach come to fruition. Experimental approaches to psychopathology, in particular those used to test conditioning theories and cognitive theories, have steadily expanded, and experimental analysis of processes characterising and maintaining mental disorders have become an established research area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信