探讨参与者对阻力训练不良事件的看法:一项定性研究。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Rasha El-Kotob, Justin Rodriguez Pagcanlungan, B Catharine Craven, Catherine Sherrington, Marina Mourtzakis, Lora Giangregorio
{"title":"探讨参与者对阻力训练不良事件的看法:一项定性研究。","authors":"Rasha El-Kotob,&nbsp;Justin Rodriguez Pagcanlungan,&nbsp;B Catharine Craven,&nbsp;Catherine Sherrington,&nbsp;Marina Mourtzakis,&nbsp;Lora Giangregorio","doi":"10.1139/apnm-2022-0117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this study was to explore the experiences and perspectives of individuals with chronic health conditions who had an adverse event (AE) as a result of resistance training (RT). We conducted web conference or telephone-based one-on-one semi-structured interviews with 12 participants with chronic health conditions who had an AE as a result of RT. Interview data were analyzed using the thematic framework method. Six themes were identified: (1) personal experiences with aging influence perceptions of RT; (2) physical and emotional consequences of AEs limit activities and define future RT participation; (3) injury recovery defines the severity of AE; (4) health conditions influence the perceived risks and benefits of participating in RT; (5) RT setting and trained supervision influence exercise behaviors and risk perceptions; and (6) experiencing a previous AE influences future exercise behavior. Despite participant awareness of the value and benefits of RT in both the context of aging and chronic health conditions, there is concern about experiencing exercise-related AEs. The perceived risks of RT influenced the participants' decision to engage or return to RT. Consequently, to promote RT participation, the risks, not just the benefits, should be properly reported in future studies, translated, and disseminated to the public. <b>Novelty:</b> -To increase the quality of published research with respect to AE reporting in RT studies. -Health care providers and people with common health conditions will be able to make evidence-based decisions as to whether the benefits of RT truly outweigh the risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":8116,"journal":{"name":"Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring participants' perspectives on adverse events due to resistance training: a qualitative study.\",\"authors\":\"Rasha El-Kotob,&nbsp;Justin Rodriguez Pagcanlungan,&nbsp;B Catharine Craven,&nbsp;Catherine Sherrington,&nbsp;Marina Mourtzakis,&nbsp;Lora Giangregorio\",\"doi\":\"10.1139/apnm-2022-0117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The objective of this study was to explore the experiences and perspectives of individuals with chronic health conditions who had an adverse event (AE) as a result of resistance training (RT). We conducted web conference or telephone-based one-on-one semi-structured interviews with 12 participants with chronic health conditions who had an AE as a result of RT. Interview data were analyzed using the thematic framework method. Six themes were identified: (1) personal experiences with aging influence perceptions of RT; (2) physical and emotional consequences of AEs limit activities and define future RT participation; (3) injury recovery defines the severity of AE; (4) health conditions influence the perceived risks and benefits of participating in RT; (5) RT setting and trained supervision influence exercise behaviors and risk perceptions; and (6) experiencing a previous AE influences future exercise behavior. Despite participant awareness of the value and benefits of RT in both the context of aging and chronic health conditions, there is concern about experiencing exercise-related AEs. The perceived risks of RT influenced the participants' decision to engage or return to RT. Consequently, to promote RT participation, the risks, not just the benefits, should be properly reported in future studies, translated, and disseminated to the public. <b>Novelty:</b> -To increase the quality of published research with respect to AE reporting in RT studies. -Health care providers and people with common health conditions will be able to make evidence-based decisions as to whether the benefits of RT truly outweigh the risks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8116,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2022-0117\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2022-0117","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是探讨慢性健康状况患者因阻力训练(RT)而发生不良事件(AE)的经历和观点。我们对12名慢性健康状况患者进行了网络会议或基于电话的一对一半结构化访谈。访谈数据采用主题框架方法进行分析。研究确定了六个主题:(1)个人衰老经历对RT感知的影响;(2) ae的身体和情绪后果限制了活动,并定义了未来的RT参与;(3)损伤恢复决定AE的严重程度;(4)健康状况影响参与RT的感知风险和获益;(5) RT设置和训练有素的监督影响运动行为和风险认知;(6)既往AE经历会影响未来的运动行为。尽管参与者意识到RT在衰老和慢性健康状况下的价值和益处,但仍存在对经历运动相关ae的担忧。感知到的RT风险影响了参与者参与或返回RT的决定。因此,为了促进RT参与,在未来的研究中应该适当地报告风险,而不仅仅是收益,翻译并传播给公众。新颖性:-提高已发表的关于RT研究中AE报告的研究质量。卫生保健提供者和有常见健康状况的人将能够做出基于证据的决定,以确定RT的益处是否真的大于风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring participants' perspectives on adverse events due to resistance training: a qualitative study.

The objective of this study was to explore the experiences and perspectives of individuals with chronic health conditions who had an adverse event (AE) as a result of resistance training (RT). We conducted web conference or telephone-based one-on-one semi-structured interviews with 12 participants with chronic health conditions who had an AE as a result of RT. Interview data were analyzed using the thematic framework method. Six themes were identified: (1) personal experiences with aging influence perceptions of RT; (2) physical and emotional consequences of AEs limit activities and define future RT participation; (3) injury recovery defines the severity of AE; (4) health conditions influence the perceived risks and benefits of participating in RT; (5) RT setting and trained supervision influence exercise behaviors and risk perceptions; and (6) experiencing a previous AE influences future exercise behavior. Despite participant awareness of the value and benefits of RT in both the context of aging and chronic health conditions, there is concern about experiencing exercise-related AEs. The perceived risks of RT influenced the participants' decision to engage or return to RT. Consequently, to promote RT participation, the risks, not just the benefits, should be properly reported in future studies, translated, and disseminated to the public. Novelty: -To increase the quality of published research with respect to AE reporting in RT studies. -Health care providers and people with common health conditions will be able to make evidence-based decisions as to whether the benefits of RT truly outweigh the risks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
113
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism publishes original research articles, reviews, and commentaries, focussing on the application of physiology, nutrition, and metabolism to the study of human health, physical activity, and fitness. The published research, reviews, and symposia will be of interest to exercise physiologists, physical fitness and exercise rehabilitation specialists, public health and health care professionals, as well as basic and applied physiologists, nutritionists, and biochemists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信