Mohammad Darvishi, Saeid Heidari-Soureshjani, Matin Bidares
{"title":"质子泵抑制剂与食管腺癌关系的系统评价和meta分析。","authors":"Mohammad Darvishi, Saeid Heidari-Soureshjani, Matin Bidares","doi":"10.2174/2589977515666230112165525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and aim: </strong>Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) mortality continues to increase across the world. This meta-analysis was aimed to investigate the relationship between proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and the risk of EAC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This meta-analysis was done as per the PRISMA checklist using relevant keywords. To this end, an extensive search was done on 29/6/2022 in EMBASE, Web of Science (ISI), PubMed, and Scopus. In this study, 95% confidence interval (CI) and standardized mean difference (SMD) were used to estimate the overall effect size. Analysis of the odds ratio (OR) for EAC was done using a random effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 studies were included in the review. Compared to the group that received PPIs, the OR of EAC in the recipients of the PPIs group was obtained at 0.67 (95% CI = 0.39-1.29, P = 0.240). The meta-regression, including year, follow-up time, study design, sample size, quality of the study, study period, and geographical location, demonstrated no source of heterogeneity (P > 0.10).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No significant relationship was found between PPIs use and the risk of EAC. Accordingly, PPIs do not have a protective or risk factor effect on EAC.</p>","PeriodicalId":37008,"journal":{"name":"Current Drug Research Reviews","volume":"15 3","pages":"262-271"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Relationship Between Proton Pump Inhibitors and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Darvishi, Saeid Heidari-Soureshjani, Matin Bidares\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/2589977515666230112165525\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction and aim: </strong>Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) mortality continues to increase across the world. This meta-analysis was aimed to investigate the relationship between proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and the risk of EAC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This meta-analysis was done as per the PRISMA checklist using relevant keywords. To this end, an extensive search was done on 29/6/2022 in EMBASE, Web of Science (ISI), PubMed, and Scopus. In this study, 95% confidence interval (CI) and standardized mean difference (SMD) were used to estimate the overall effect size. Analysis of the odds ratio (OR) for EAC was done using a random effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 studies were included in the review. Compared to the group that received PPIs, the OR of EAC in the recipients of the PPIs group was obtained at 0.67 (95% CI = 0.39-1.29, P = 0.240). The meta-regression, including year, follow-up time, study design, sample size, quality of the study, study period, and geographical location, demonstrated no source of heterogeneity (P > 0.10).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No significant relationship was found between PPIs use and the risk of EAC. Accordingly, PPIs do not have a protective or risk factor effect on EAC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37008,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Drug Research Reviews\",\"volume\":\"15 3\",\"pages\":\"262-271\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Drug Research Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/2589977515666230112165525\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Drug Research Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2589977515666230112165525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介和目的:食管癌(EAC)死亡率在世界范围内持续上升。本荟萃分析旨在探讨质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)与EAC风险之间的关系。方法:采用相关关键词,按照PRISMA检查表进行meta分析。为此,我们于2022年6月29日在EMBASE、Web of Science (ISI)、PubMed和Scopus中进行了广泛的检索。在本研究中,使用95%置信区间(CI)和标准化平均差(SMD)来估计总体效应大小。采用随机效应模型分析EAC的优势比(OR)。结果:共纳入20项研究。与PPIs组相比,PPIs组EAC的OR为0.67 (95% CI = 0.39-1.29, P = 0.240)。meta回归包括年份、随访时间、研究设计、样本量、研究质量、研究周期和地理位置,均未发现异质性来源(P > 0.10)。结论:PPIs的使用与EAC的发生无显著关系。因此,PPIs对EAC没有保护或危险因素作用。
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Relationship Between Proton Pump Inhibitors and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.
Introduction and aim: Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) mortality continues to increase across the world. This meta-analysis was aimed to investigate the relationship between proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and the risk of EAC.
Methods: This meta-analysis was done as per the PRISMA checklist using relevant keywords. To this end, an extensive search was done on 29/6/2022 in EMBASE, Web of Science (ISI), PubMed, and Scopus. In this study, 95% confidence interval (CI) and standardized mean difference (SMD) were used to estimate the overall effect size. Analysis of the odds ratio (OR) for EAC was done using a random effects model.
Results: A total of 20 studies were included in the review. Compared to the group that received PPIs, the OR of EAC in the recipients of the PPIs group was obtained at 0.67 (95% CI = 0.39-1.29, P = 0.240). The meta-regression, including year, follow-up time, study design, sample size, quality of the study, study period, and geographical location, demonstrated no source of heterogeneity (P > 0.10).
Conclusion: No significant relationship was found between PPIs use and the risk of EAC. Accordingly, PPIs do not have a protective or risk factor effect on EAC.