伊朗工业工人和大学工作人员代谢综合征患病率的差异。

IF 1.8 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Journal of Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders Pub Date : 2023-01-11 eCollection Date: 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1007/s40200-022-01162-5
Hamidreza Pouragha, Gholamreza Pouryaghoub, Mahsa Naserpour, Ramin Mehrdad
{"title":"伊朗工业工人和大学工作人员代谢综合征患病率的差异。","authors":"Hamidreza Pouragha, Gholamreza Pouryaghoub, Mahsa Naserpour, Ramin Mehrdad","doi":"10.1007/s40200-022-01162-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Is there a difference in the prevalence of metabolic syndrome between employee service jobs and industrial jobs in Iran? In this study, we tried to answer this question. For this purpose, we compared the two populations of employees and workers. We compared the staff of the University of Medical Sciences as a service employees population (clinical and office work) to the industrial workers of a large automotive company (often with industrial occupations).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this cross-sectional study conducted in Tehran in 2020, the prevalence of metabolic syndrome among 4,372 people employed by the university and 3,899 automotive industry employees was examined and compared. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome was assessed based on two criteria, National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III) and International Diabetes Federation (IDF).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that the prevalence of metabolic syndrome among university staff was higher than the automotive industrial workers. According to ATP III criteria, the former and latter showed the prevalence of metabolic syndrome of 13.1% among and 6.1%, respectively among. Also, based on IDF criteria, the prevalence of metabolic syndrome was 23.3% and 12.6% in two groups mentioned.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the findings of this study, the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in university staff was almost double that in industry workers. At first glance, the physical activity of most automotive, industrial workers seems to be the main reason for this difference; however, a prevalence of about twice implies further factors. According to the authors, the legal implementation of monitoring, promotion, and surveillance programs of occupational health, in industrial environments can be a factor accounting for a significant difference in the prevalence of metabolic syndrome between the two populations observed. The authors suggest implementing similar programs for Iranian public sector employees to enhance their health status.</p>","PeriodicalId":15635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders","volume":"22 1","pages":"443-453"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10225413/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disparities in the prevalence of metabolic syndrome between Iranian industrial workers and university staff.\",\"authors\":\"Hamidreza Pouragha, Gholamreza Pouryaghoub, Mahsa Naserpour, Ramin Mehrdad\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40200-022-01162-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Is there a difference in the prevalence of metabolic syndrome between employee service jobs and industrial jobs in Iran? In this study, we tried to answer this question. For this purpose, we compared the two populations of employees and workers. We compared the staff of the University of Medical Sciences as a service employees population (clinical and office work) to the industrial workers of a large automotive company (often with industrial occupations).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this cross-sectional study conducted in Tehran in 2020, the prevalence of metabolic syndrome among 4,372 people employed by the university and 3,899 automotive industry employees was examined and compared. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome was assessed based on two criteria, National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III) and International Diabetes Federation (IDF).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that the prevalence of metabolic syndrome among university staff was higher than the automotive industrial workers. According to ATP III criteria, the former and latter showed the prevalence of metabolic syndrome of 13.1% among and 6.1%, respectively among. Also, based on IDF criteria, the prevalence of metabolic syndrome was 23.3% and 12.6% in two groups mentioned.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the findings of this study, the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in university staff was almost double that in industry workers. At first glance, the physical activity of most automotive, industrial workers seems to be the main reason for this difference; however, a prevalence of about twice implies further factors. According to the authors, the legal implementation of monitoring, promotion, and surveillance programs of occupational health, in industrial environments can be a factor accounting for a significant difference in the prevalence of metabolic syndrome between the two populations observed. The authors suggest implementing similar programs for Iranian public sector employees to enhance their health status.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"443-453\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10225413/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40200-022-01162-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40200-022-01162-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在伊朗,员工服务工作和工业工作的代谢综合征患病率有差异吗?在这项研究中,我们试图回答这个问题。为此,我们对员工和工人这两个群体进行了比较。我们将医学科学大学的员工作为服务员工群体(临床和办公室工作)与大型汽车公司的工业工人(通常从事工业职业)进行了比较。方法:在2020年于德黑兰进行的这项横断面研究中,对该大学4372名员工和3899名汽车行业员工的代谢综合征患病率进行了检查和比较。代谢综合征的患病率根据两个标准进行评估,即国家胆固醇教育计划成人治疗小组III(ATP III)和国际糖尿病联合会(IDF)。结果:大学生代谢综合征患病率高于汽车行业从业人员。根据ATP III标准,前者和后者的代谢综合征患病率分别为13.1%和6.1%。此外,根据IDF标准,上述两组的代谢综合征患病率分别为23.3%和12.6%。结论:根据这项研究的结果,大学工作人员代谢综合征的患病率几乎是行业工作人员的两倍。乍一看,大多数汽车、工业工人的体力活动似乎是造成这种差异的主要原因;然而,大约两倍的患病率意味着更多的因素。根据作者的说法,在工业环境中,职业健康监测、促进和监测计划的合法实施可能是导致观察到的两个人群代谢综合征患病率显著差异的一个因素。作者建议对伊朗公共部门员工实施类似的计划,以提高他们的健康状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disparities in the prevalence of metabolic syndrome between Iranian industrial workers and university staff.

Background: Is there a difference in the prevalence of metabolic syndrome between employee service jobs and industrial jobs in Iran? In this study, we tried to answer this question. For this purpose, we compared the two populations of employees and workers. We compared the staff of the University of Medical Sciences as a service employees population (clinical and office work) to the industrial workers of a large automotive company (often with industrial occupations).

Method: In this cross-sectional study conducted in Tehran in 2020, the prevalence of metabolic syndrome among 4,372 people employed by the university and 3,899 automotive industry employees was examined and compared. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome was assessed based on two criteria, National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III) and International Diabetes Federation (IDF).

Results: The results showed that the prevalence of metabolic syndrome among university staff was higher than the automotive industrial workers. According to ATP III criteria, the former and latter showed the prevalence of metabolic syndrome of 13.1% among and 6.1%, respectively among. Also, based on IDF criteria, the prevalence of metabolic syndrome was 23.3% and 12.6% in two groups mentioned.

Conclusion: Based on the findings of this study, the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in university staff was almost double that in industry workers. At first glance, the physical activity of most automotive, industrial workers seems to be the main reason for this difference; however, a prevalence of about twice implies further factors. According to the authors, the legal implementation of monitoring, promotion, and surveillance programs of occupational health, in industrial environments can be a factor accounting for a significant difference in the prevalence of metabolic syndrome between the two populations observed. The authors suggest implementing similar programs for Iranian public sector employees to enhance their health status.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders
Journal of Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.60%
发文量
210
期刊介绍: Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders is a peer reviewed journal which publishes original clinical and translational articles and reviews in the field of endocrinology and provides a forum of debate of the highest quality on these issues. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to, diabetes, lipid disorders, metabolic disorders, osteoporosis, interdisciplinary practices in endocrinology, cardiovascular and metabolic risk, aging research, obesity, traditional medicine, pychosomatic research, behavioral medicine, ethics and evidence-based practices.As of Jan 2018 the journal is published by Springer as a hybrid journal with no article processing charges. All articles published before 2018 are available free of charge on springerlink.Unofficial 2017 2-year Impact Factor: 1.816.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信