成年创伤患者继发于骨内输血的红细胞溶血:一项系统综述。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Matt Ellington, I Walker, E Barnard
{"title":"成年创伤患者继发于骨内输血的红细胞溶血:一项系统综述。","authors":"Matt Ellington, I Walker, E Barnard","doi":"10.1136/military-2023-002378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intraosseous (IO) administration of medications and blood products is accepted practice in major trauma when intravenous access is not immediately available. However, there is a concern that the high infusion pressures required for IO transfusion may increase the risk of red cell haemolysis and its associated complications. The aim of this systematic review is to synthesise the existing evidence describing the risks of red cell haemolysis in IO blood transfusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We undertook a systematic search of MEDLINE, CINAHL and EMBASE using the search terms: \"intraosseous transfusion\" and \"haemolysis\". Two authors independently screened abstracts, and reviewed full-text articles against the inclusion criteria. Reference lists of included studies were reviewed and a grey literature search undertaken. Studies were assessed for risk of bias. Inclusion criteria were: all human and animal study types that reported novel data on IO-associated red cell haemolysis. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three abstracts were identified; n=9 full papers met the inclusion criteria. No further studies were identified from reference lists or grey literature. These papers included: seven large animal translational studies, a prospective and a retrospective human study. The overall risk of bias was high. One animal study with good translatability to adult patients with trauma demonstrated haemolysis. Other animal studies had methodological constraints that limit their human applicability. No haemolysis was observed in low-density flat bones (sternum), whereas haemolysis was reported in long bones (humerus, tibia). IO infusion using a three-way tap was associated with haemolysis. Conversely, pressure bag transfusion was not associated with haemolysis, but this method may result in insufficient flow rates for effective resuscitation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a paucity of high-quality evidence surrounding the risks of red cell haemolysis in IO blood transfusion. However, evidence from one study suggests that the likelihood is increased by use of a three-way tap to administer blood transfusion to young adult male patients with trauma. Further research is needed to address this important clinical question.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42022318902.</p>","PeriodicalId":48485,"journal":{"name":"Bmj Military Health","volume":" ","pages":"173-178"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Red cell haemolysis secondary to intraosseous (IO) blood transfusion in adult patients with major trauma: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Matt Ellington, I Walker, E Barnard\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/military-2023-002378\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intraosseous (IO) administration of medications and blood products is accepted practice in major trauma when intravenous access is not immediately available. However, there is a concern that the high infusion pressures required for IO transfusion may increase the risk of red cell haemolysis and its associated complications. The aim of this systematic review is to synthesise the existing evidence describing the risks of red cell haemolysis in IO blood transfusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We undertook a systematic search of MEDLINE, CINAHL and EMBASE using the search terms: \\\"intraosseous transfusion\\\" and \\\"haemolysis\\\". Two authors independently screened abstracts, and reviewed full-text articles against the inclusion criteria. Reference lists of included studies were reviewed and a grey literature search undertaken. Studies were assessed for risk of bias. Inclusion criteria were: all human and animal study types that reported novel data on IO-associated red cell haemolysis. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three abstracts were identified; n=9 full papers met the inclusion criteria. No further studies were identified from reference lists or grey literature. These papers included: seven large animal translational studies, a prospective and a retrospective human study. The overall risk of bias was high. One animal study with good translatability to adult patients with trauma demonstrated haemolysis. Other animal studies had methodological constraints that limit their human applicability. No haemolysis was observed in low-density flat bones (sternum), whereas haemolysis was reported in long bones (humerus, tibia). IO infusion using a three-way tap was associated with haemolysis. Conversely, pressure bag transfusion was not associated with haemolysis, but this method may result in insufficient flow rates for effective resuscitation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a paucity of high-quality evidence surrounding the risks of red cell haemolysis in IO blood transfusion. However, evidence from one study suggests that the likelihood is increased by use of a three-way tap to administer blood transfusion to young adult male patients with trauma. Further research is needed to address this important clinical question.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42022318902.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48485,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bmj Military Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"173-178\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bmj Military Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/military-2023-002378\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bmj Military Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/military-2023-002378","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在不能立即获得静脉通路的重大创伤中,骨内给药和血液制品是公认的做法。然而,有一种担忧是,静脉输液所需的高输液压力可能会增加红细胞溶血及其相关并发症的风险。本系统综述的目的是综合现有的证据来描述输血时红细胞溶血的风险。方法:以“骨内输血”和“溶血”为检索词,对MEDLINE、CINAHL和EMBASE进行系统检索。两位作者独立筛选摘要,并根据纳入标准审查全文文章。对纳入研究的参考文献进行了回顾,并进行了灰色文献检索。评估研究的偏倚风险。纳入标准为:所有报告了io相关红细胞溶血新数据的人类和动物研究类型。采用了系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目指南。结果:共筛选出23篇摘要;N =9篇全文符合纳入标准。从参考文献列表或灰色文献中未发现进一步的研究。这些论文包括:七项大型动物转化研究,一项前瞻性和一项回顾性人类研究。偏倚的总体风险很高。一项具有良好可翻译性的动物研究表明,成年创伤患者存在溶血现象。其他动物研究有方法上的限制,限制了它们在人类身上的适用性。在低密度扁平骨(胸骨)中未观察到溶血,而在长骨(肱骨、胫骨)中报告了溶血。使用三向龙头的IO输注与溶血有关。相反,压力袋输血与溶血无关,但这种方法可能导致流量不足,无法有效复苏。结论:关于输血时红细胞溶血的风险缺乏高质量的证据。然而,一项研究的证据表明,使用三向龙头给年轻的成年男性创伤患者输血,增加了这种可能性。需要进一步的研究来解决这个重要的临床问题。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42022318902。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Red cell haemolysis secondary to intraosseous (IO) blood transfusion in adult patients with major trauma: a systematic review.

Introduction: Intraosseous (IO) administration of medications and blood products is accepted practice in major trauma when intravenous access is not immediately available. However, there is a concern that the high infusion pressures required for IO transfusion may increase the risk of red cell haemolysis and its associated complications. The aim of this systematic review is to synthesise the existing evidence describing the risks of red cell haemolysis in IO blood transfusion.

Methods: We undertook a systematic search of MEDLINE, CINAHL and EMBASE using the search terms: "intraosseous transfusion" and "haemolysis". Two authors independently screened abstracts, and reviewed full-text articles against the inclusion criteria. Reference lists of included studies were reviewed and a grey literature search undertaken. Studies were assessed for risk of bias. Inclusion criteria were: all human and animal study types that reported novel data on IO-associated red cell haemolysis. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline was used.

Results: Twenty-three abstracts were identified; n=9 full papers met the inclusion criteria. No further studies were identified from reference lists or grey literature. These papers included: seven large animal translational studies, a prospective and a retrospective human study. The overall risk of bias was high. One animal study with good translatability to adult patients with trauma demonstrated haemolysis. Other animal studies had methodological constraints that limit their human applicability. No haemolysis was observed in low-density flat bones (sternum), whereas haemolysis was reported in long bones (humerus, tibia). IO infusion using a three-way tap was associated with haemolysis. Conversely, pressure bag transfusion was not associated with haemolysis, but this method may result in insufficient flow rates for effective resuscitation.

Conclusions: There is a paucity of high-quality evidence surrounding the risks of red cell haemolysis in IO blood transfusion. However, evidence from one study suggests that the likelihood is increased by use of a three-way tap to administer blood transfusion to young adult male patients with trauma. Further research is needed to address this important clinical question.

Prospero registration number: CRD42022318902.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bmj Military Health
Bmj Military Health MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
116
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信