医科学生和住院医生喜欢电子书的便利,但更喜欢纸质书的阅读体验。

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Erin M Watson
{"title":"医科学生和住院医生喜欢电子书的便利,但更喜欢纸质书的阅读体验。","authors":"Erin M Watson","doi":"10.1111/hir.12485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Increasingly, libraries buy medical monographs as ebooks, but that may not be what medical students and residents want. Some studies have shown that they prefer print books for some types of reading. On the other hand, for participants in distributed medical programs, ebooks are more accessible.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine whether medical students and residents at an institution with a distributed medical education program prefer medical ebooks or print books.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In February 2019, 844 medical students and residents were invited to complete an online questionnaire on their format preferences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred thirty-two students and residents responded. Most preferred electronic format for reading a few pages, but print for entire books. Respondents preferred ebooks because they were immediately available, searchable and could be used on the go, and print books because they strained users' eyes less, facilitated absorption of the text and could be held in users' hands. The location of respondents and year of study had little effect on responses.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Libraries should consider buying quick reference and large, heavy textbooks as ebooks and pocket-sized or shorter, single-topic titles, in print format.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Libraries have a responsibility to make both print and ebooks available to their users.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medical students and residents appreciate ebooks' convenience, but prefer the print book reading experience.\",\"authors\":\"Erin M Watson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/hir.12485\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Increasingly, libraries buy medical monographs as ebooks, but that may not be what medical students and residents want. Some studies have shown that they prefer print books for some types of reading. On the other hand, for participants in distributed medical programs, ebooks are more accessible.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine whether medical students and residents at an institution with a distributed medical education program prefer medical ebooks or print books.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In February 2019, 844 medical students and residents were invited to complete an online questionnaire on their format preferences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred thirty-two students and residents responded. Most preferred electronic format for reading a few pages, but print for entire books. Respondents preferred ebooks because they were immediately available, searchable and could be used on the go, and print books because they strained users' eyes less, facilitated absorption of the text and could be held in users' hands. The location of respondents and year of study had little effect on responses.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Libraries should consider buying quick reference and large, heavy textbooks as ebooks and pocket-sized or shorter, single-topic titles, in print format.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Libraries have a responsibility to make both print and ebooks available to their users.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12485\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12485","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:越来越多的图书馆购买医学专著作为电子书,但这可能不是医学生和住院医生想要的。一些研究表明,在某些类型的阅读中,他们更喜欢纸质书。另一方面,对于分布式医疗项目的参与者来说,电子书更容易获得。目的:确定分布式医学教育机构的医学生和住院医师是否更喜欢医学电子书或纸质书。方法:于2019年2月,邀请844名医学生和住院医师完成一份关于其格式偏好的在线问卷。结果:232名学生和住院医师回应。最喜欢的电子格式阅读几页,但打印整本书。受访者更喜欢电子书,因为它们可以立即获得,可搜索并且可以在旅途中使用,而印刷书籍则是因为它们不那么劳累用户的眼睛,有助于吸收文本,并且可以握在用户手中。受访者的地点和学习年份对调查结果影响不大。讨论:图书馆应该考虑购买快速参考书和大而厚的电子书,以及口袋大小或更短的单一主题的纸质书。结论:图书馆有责任为用户提供纸质书和电子书。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Medical students and residents appreciate ebooks' convenience, but prefer the print book reading experience.

Background: Increasingly, libraries buy medical monographs as ebooks, but that may not be what medical students and residents want. Some studies have shown that they prefer print books for some types of reading. On the other hand, for participants in distributed medical programs, ebooks are more accessible.

Objectives: To determine whether medical students and residents at an institution with a distributed medical education program prefer medical ebooks or print books.

Methods: In February 2019, 844 medical students and residents were invited to complete an online questionnaire on their format preferences.

Results: Two hundred thirty-two students and residents responded. Most preferred electronic format for reading a few pages, but print for entire books. Respondents preferred ebooks because they were immediately available, searchable and could be used on the go, and print books because they strained users' eyes less, facilitated absorption of the text and could be held in users' hands. The location of respondents and year of study had little effect on responses.

Discussion: Libraries should consider buying quick reference and large, heavy textbooks as ebooks and pocket-sized or shorter, single-topic titles, in print format.

Conclusions: Libraries have a responsibility to make both print and ebooks available to their users.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信