2019冠状病毒病大流行期间电话平衡咨询问卷评估。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Audiology and Neuro-Otology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-10 DOI:10.1159/000529137
Anna I Kaleva, Laura Leach, Fahmy Fahmy, Lucy A Truman, Marcos Martinez Del Pero
{"title":"2019冠状病毒病大流行期间电话平衡咨询问卷评估。","authors":"Anna I Kaleva,&nbsp;Laura Leach,&nbsp;Fahmy Fahmy,&nbsp;Lucy A Truman,&nbsp;Marcos Martinez Del Pero","doi":"10.1159/000529137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>During the coronavirus disease 2019, pandemic clinical practice had to change, and this study trialled a diagnostic questionnaire to assess patients with dizziness over the telephone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All 115 patients awaiting otorhinolaryngological assessment for balance were randomised to receive a dizziness questionnaire in the post prior to their telephone consultation or not. Consultation outcomes were recorded by the clinicians conducting the consultation. Follow-up data were collected in June 2022 for final outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>82/115 patients had consultations with complete data collection: 35 in the questionnaire group (QG) and 47 in the no questionnaire group (NQG), with a 70% response rate in the QG. Clinicians made a diagnosis in 27/35 QG consultations versus 27/47 NQG consultations. Nine out of 35 QG patients required additional investigations compared to 34/47 in the NQG (p &lt; 0.05). Only 6/35 QG patients needed additional telephone follow-up, compared to 20/47 NQG patients (p &lt; 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using a diagnostic questionnaire increased clinicians' ability to come to a diagnosis in telephone consultations.</p>","PeriodicalId":55432,"journal":{"name":"Audiology and Neuro-Otology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating a Questionnaire in Telephone Balance Consultations during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Anna I Kaleva,&nbsp;Laura Leach,&nbsp;Fahmy Fahmy,&nbsp;Lucy A Truman,&nbsp;Marcos Martinez Del Pero\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000529137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>During the coronavirus disease 2019, pandemic clinical practice had to change, and this study trialled a diagnostic questionnaire to assess patients with dizziness over the telephone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All 115 patients awaiting otorhinolaryngological assessment for balance were randomised to receive a dizziness questionnaire in the post prior to their telephone consultation or not. Consultation outcomes were recorded by the clinicians conducting the consultation. Follow-up data were collected in June 2022 for final outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>82/115 patients had consultations with complete data collection: 35 in the questionnaire group (QG) and 47 in the no questionnaire group (NQG), with a 70% response rate in the QG. Clinicians made a diagnosis in 27/35 QG consultations versus 27/47 NQG consultations. Nine out of 35 QG patients required additional investigations compared to 34/47 in the NQG (p &lt; 0.05). Only 6/35 QG patients needed additional telephone follow-up, compared to 20/47 NQG patients (p &lt; 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using a diagnostic questionnaire increased clinicians' ability to come to a diagnosis in telephone consultations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Audiology and Neuro-Otology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Audiology and Neuro-Otology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000529137\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/5/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology and Neuro-Otology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000529137","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:在2019冠状病毒病期间,大流行的临床实践不得不改变,这项研究通过电话试验了一份诊断问卷,以评估头晕患者。方法:将所有115名等待耳鼻喉科平衡评估的患者随机分组,在电话咨询前或不咨询前接受头晕问卷调查。会诊结果由进行会诊的临床医生记录。2022年6月收集了最终结果的后续数据。结果:82/115名患者进行了完整数据收集的会诊:问卷组(QG)35名,无问卷组(NQG)47名,QG的应答率为70%。临床医生在27/35次QG会诊中作出诊断,而在27/47次NQG会诊中则作出诊断。35名QG患者中有9名需要额外调查,而NQG患者中为34/47名(p<;0.05)。与20/47名NQG患者相比,只有6/35名QQ患者需要额外的电话随访(p<)。结论:使用诊断问卷提高了临床医生在电话咨询中得出诊断的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating a Questionnaire in Telephone Balance Consultations during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic.

Introduction: During the coronavirus disease 2019, pandemic clinical practice had to change, and this study trialled a diagnostic questionnaire to assess patients with dizziness over the telephone.

Methods: All 115 patients awaiting otorhinolaryngological assessment for balance were randomised to receive a dizziness questionnaire in the post prior to their telephone consultation or not. Consultation outcomes were recorded by the clinicians conducting the consultation. Follow-up data were collected in June 2022 for final outcomes.

Results: 82/115 patients had consultations with complete data collection: 35 in the questionnaire group (QG) and 47 in the no questionnaire group (NQG), with a 70% response rate in the QG. Clinicians made a diagnosis in 27/35 QG consultations versus 27/47 NQG consultations. Nine out of 35 QG patients required additional investigations compared to 34/47 in the NQG (p < 0.05). Only 6/35 QG patients needed additional telephone follow-up, compared to 20/47 NQG patients (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Using a diagnostic questionnaire increased clinicians' ability to come to a diagnosis in telephone consultations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Audiology and Neuro-Otology
Audiology and Neuro-Otology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
35
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Audiology and Neurotology'' provides a forum for the publication of the most-advanced and rigorous scientific research related to the basic science and clinical aspects of the auditory and vestibular system and diseases of the ear. This journal seeks submission of cutting edge research opening up new and innovative fields of study that may improve our understanding and treatment of patients with disorders of the auditory and vestibular systems, their central connections and their perception in the central nervous system. In addition to original papers the journal also offers invited review articles on current topics written by leading experts in the field. The journal is of primary importance for all scientists and practitioners interested in audiology, otology and neurotology, auditory neurosciences and related disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信