Leila Mirzaee Saba, Hassan Hashemi, Ebrahim Jafarzadehpour, Ali Mirzajani, Abbasali Yekta, Abolfazl Jafarzadehpour, Arghavan Zarei, Payam Nabovati, Mehdi Khabazkhoob
{"title":"正常人不同视觉象限视觉诱发电位记录的P100波潜伏期和振幅。","authors":"Leila Mirzaee Saba, Hassan Hashemi, Ebrahim Jafarzadehpour, Ali Mirzajani, Abbasali Yekta, Abolfazl Jafarzadehpour, Arghavan Zarei, Payam Nabovati, Mehdi Khabazkhoob","doi":"10.18502/jovr.v18i2.13184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Assessment of the pattern visual evoked potential (PVEP) responses in different areas of visual fields in individuals with normal vision.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted on 80 eyes of normal subjects aged 18-35 years. All participants underwent refraction and visual acuity examination. Visual evoked potential (VEP) responses were recorded in different areas of field. The repeated measure test was used to compare the P100 latency and amplitude of PVEP among different areas.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The repeated measures analysis of variance showed a statistically significant difference among different areas in terms of amplitude and latency of P100 (<i>P</i> = 0.002 and <i>P</i> <math><mo><</mo></math> 0.001, respectively). According to the results, the highest and lowest amplitude of P100 was observed in inferior-nasal and superior areas, respectively. The highest and lowest latency of P100 was related to the temporal and inferior-nasal areas, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study partially revealed the details of local PVEP distribution in the visual field and there was a significant difference in the amplitude and latency of PVEP wave in different areas of the visual field.</p>","PeriodicalId":16586,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research","volume":"18 2","pages":"175-181"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10172794/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"P100 Wave Latency and Amplitude in Visual Evoked Potential Records in Different Visual Quadrants of Normal Individuals.\",\"authors\":\"Leila Mirzaee Saba, Hassan Hashemi, Ebrahim Jafarzadehpour, Ali Mirzajani, Abbasali Yekta, Abolfazl Jafarzadehpour, Arghavan Zarei, Payam Nabovati, Mehdi Khabazkhoob\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/jovr.v18i2.13184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Assessment of the pattern visual evoked potential (PVEP) responses in different areas of visual fields in individuals with normal vision.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted on 80 eyes of normal subjects aged 18-35 years. All participants underwent refraction and visual acuity examination. Visual evoked potential (VEP) responses were recorded in different areas of field. The repeated measure test was used to compare the P100 latency and amplitude of PVEP among different areas.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The repeated measures analysis of variance showed a statistically significant difference among different areas in terms of amplitude and latency of P100 (<i>P</i> = 0.002 and <i>P</i> <math><mo><</mo></math> 0.001, respectively). According to the results, the highest and lowest amplitude of P100 was observed in inferior-nasal and superior areas, respectively. The highest and lowest latency of P100 was related to the temporal and inferior-nasal areas, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study partially revealed the details of local PVEP distribution in the visual field and there was a significant difference in the amplitude and latency of PVEP wave in different areas of the visual field.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research\",\"volume\":\"18 2\",\"pages\":\"175-181\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10172794/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v18i2.13184\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v18i2.13184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评估正常视力个体不同视野区域的模式视觉诱发电位(PVEP)反应。方法:对80只18 ~ 35岁的正常人眼睛进行观察。所有参与者都进行了屈光和视力检查。在不同视场区域记录视觉诱发电位(VEP)反应。采用重复测量法比较不同区域P100潜伏期和PVEP振幅。结果:重复测量方差分析显示,不同区域间P100振幅和潜伏期差异有统计学意义(P = 0.002, P = 0.001)。结果显示,P100的最高和最低振幅分别出现在鼻下区和鼻上区。P100的最高潜伏期和最低潜伏期分别与颞区和下鼻区有关。结论:本研究部分揭示了PVEP在视野局部分布的细节,PVEP波在不同视野区域的振幅和潜伏期存在显著差异。
P100 Wave Latency and Amplitude in Visual Evoked Potential Records in Different Visual Quadrants of Normal Individuals.
Purpose: Assessment of the pattern visual evoked potential (PVEP) responses in different areas of visual fields in individuals with normal vision.
Methods: This study was conducted on 80 eyes of normal subjects aged 18-35 years. All participants underwent refraction and visual acuity examination. Visual evoked potential (VEP) responses were recorded in different areas of field. The repeated measure test was used to compare the P100 latency and amplitude of PVEP among different areas.
Results: The repeated measures analysis of variance showed a statistically significant difference among different areas in terms of amplitude and latency of P100 (P = 0.002 and P 0.001, respectively). According to the results, the highest and lowest amplitude of P100 was observed in inferior-nasal and superior areas, respectively. The highest and lowest latency of P100 was related to the temporal and inferior-nasal areas, respectively.
Conclusion: This study partially revealed the details of local PVEP distribution in the visual field and there was a significant difference in the amplitude and latency of PVEP wave in different areas of the visual field.