[对疼痛医学数字工具的态度:对德国疼痛协会健康专业成员和自助团体成员的调查]。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Schmerz Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-20 DOI:10.1007/s00482-023-00708-7
Janosch A Priebe, Philipp Stachwitz, Julia Hagen, Anne Boltres, Katharina K Haas, Philipp Schuster, Julia Wendlinger, Mike Papenhoff, Thomas Isenberg, Jorg F Debatin, Thomas R Toelle
{"title":"[对疼痛医学数字工具的态度:对德国疼痛协会健康专业成员和自助团体成员的调查]。","authors":"Janosch A Priebe, Philipp Stachwitz, Julia Hagen, Anne Boltres, Katharina K Haas, Philipp Schuster, Julia Wendlinger, Mike Papenhoff, Thomas Isenberg, Jorg F Debatin, Thomas R Toelle","doi":"10.1007/s00482-023-00708-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Digital medicine has increasing influence on the German healthcare system. In times of social distancing during the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, digital tools enable health professionals to maintain medical care. Furthermore, digital elements have potential to provide effective guideline-oriented treatment to a broad range of patients independently from location and time. This survey was used to assess the attitudes of members of the German Pain Society (health professionals) and of associated self-help groups (patients) towards digital medicine. It was sent out as an online survey to health professionals in September 2020 and to patients in February 2021. The survey referred especially to present usage, attitude and potential concerns regarding particular digital elements. Furthermore, technical affinity was assessed. In total, 250 health professionals and 154 patients participated in the survey. The results show that-although digital elements are already known-a substantial proportion of health professionals still lack broad transfer to regular treatment. The potential of digital tools seems to be recognized by both groups; interestingly, patients consider digital medicine as more useful than health professionals. Nevertheless, concerns about for example data security or digital competence remain in both groups. Taken together, our results indicate that disruptive changes, as the implementation of digital medicine in the healthcare system, have to be guided by intense education and channeled by political policies in order to successfully integrate digital elements into medicine on a long-term basis. This would be in favor for all involved parties and is demanded especially by patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":21572,"journal":{"name":"Schmerz","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10027278/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Attitudes toward digital tools in pain medicine : Survey of German Pain Society health professional members and members of self-help groups].\",\"authors\":\"Janosch A Priebe, Philipp Stachwitz, Julia Hagen, Anne Boltres, Katharina K Haas, Philipp Schuster, Julia Wendlinger, Mike Papenhoff, Thomas Isenberg, Jorg F Debatin, Thomas R Toelle\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00482-023-00708-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Digital medicine has increasing influence on the German healthcare system. In times of social distancing during the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, digital tools enable health professionals to maintain medical care. Furthermore, digital elements have potential to provide effective guideline-oriented treatment to a broad range of patients independently from location and time. This survey was used to assess the attitudes of members of the German Pain Society (health professionals) and of associated self-help groups (patients) towards digital medicine. It was sent out as an online survey to health professionals in September 2020 and to patients in February 2021. The survey referred especially to present usage, attitude and potential concerns regarding particular digital elements. Furthermore, technical affinity was assessed. In total, 250 health professionals and 154 patients participated in the survey. The results show that-although digital elements are already known-a substantial proportion of health professionals still lack broad transfer to regular treatment. The potential of digital tools seems to be recognized by both groups; interestingly, patients consider digital medicine as more useful than health professionals. Nevertheless, concerns about for example data security or digital competence remain in both groups. Taken together, our results indicate that disruptive changes, as the implementation of digital medicine in the healthcare system, have to be guided by intense education and channeled by political policies in order to successfully integrate digital elements into medicine on a long-term basis. This would be in favor for all involved parties and is demanded especially by patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Schmerz\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10027278/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Schmerz\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00482-023-00708-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/3/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schmerz","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00482-023-00708-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数字医疗对德国医疗系统的影响越来越大。在 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间,由于社会关系疏远,数字工具使医疗专业人员能够维持医疗服务。此外,数字元素还有可能不受时间和地点的限制,为广大患者提供以指南为导向的有效治疗。这项调查用于评估德国疼痛协会成员(医疗专业人员)和相关自助团体(患者)对数字医学的态度。该调查于 2020 年 9 月以在线调查的形式发送给医疗专业人员,并于 2021 年 2 月发送给患者。调查主要涉及目前的使用情况、对特定数字元素的态度和潜在担忧。此外,还对技术亲和力进行了评估。共有 250 名医疗专业人员和 154 名患者参与了调查。调查结果表明,尽管数字化元素已广为人知,但仍有相当一部分医疗专业人员缺乏对常规治疗的广泛了解。两个群体似乎都认识到了数字化工具的潜力;有趣的是,患者认为数字化医疗比医疗专业人员更有用。尽管如此,两类人群对数据安全或数字能力等方面的担忧依然存在。综上所述,我们的研究结果表明,像在医疗保健系统中实施数字医疗这样的颠覆性变革,必须通过强化教育和政治政策的引导,才能长期成功地将数字元素融入医疗中。这将有利于所有相关方,尤其是患者的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

[Attitudes toward digital tools in pain medicine : Survey of German Pain Society health professional members and members of self-help groups].

[Attitudes toward digital tools in pain medicine : Survey of German Pain Society health professional members and members of self-help groups].

[Attitudes toward digital tools in pain medicine : Survey of German Pain Society health professional members and members of self-help groups].

[Attitudes toward digital tools in pain medicine : Survey of German Pain Society health professional members and members of self-help groups].

Digital medicine has increasing influence on the German healthcare system. In times of social distancing during the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, digital tools enable health professionals to maintain medical care. Furthermore, digital elements have potential to provide effective guideline-oriented treatment to a broad range of patients independently from location and time. This survey was used to assess the attitudes of members of the German Pain Society (health professionals) and of associated self-help groups (patients) towards digital medicine. It was sent out as an online survey to health professionals in September 2020 and to patients in February 2021. The survey referred especially to present usage, attitude and potential concerns regarding particular digital elements. Furthermore, technical affinity was assessed. In total, 250 health professionals and 154 patients participated in the survey. The results show that-although digital elements are already known-a substantial proportion of health professionals still lack broad transfer to regular treatment. The potential of digital tools seems to be recognized by both groups; interestingly, patients consider digital medicine as more useful than health professionals. Nevertheless, concerns about for example data security or digital competence remain in both groups. Taken together, our results indicate that disruptive changes, as the implementation of digital medicine in the healthcare system, have to be guided by intense education and channeled by political policies in order to successfully integrate digital elements into medicine on a long-term basis. This would be in favor for all involved parties and is demanded especially by patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Schmerz
Schmerz 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Der Schmerz is an internationally recognized journal and addresses all scientists, practitioners and psychologists, dealing with the treatment of pain patients or working in pain research. The aim of the journal is to enhance the treatment of pain patients in the long run. Review articles provide an overview on selected topics and offer the reader a summary of current findings from all fields of pain research, pain management and pain symptom management. Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of important clinical studies and serve the scientific exchange. Case reports feature interesting cases and aim at optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Review articles under the rubric ''Continuing Medical Education'' present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信