Francesco Pepe, Elena Guerini-Rocco, Matteo Fassan, Nicola Fusco, Davide Vacirca, Alberto Ranghiero, Konstantinos Venetis, Alessandra Rappa, Sergio Vincenzo Taormina, Gianluca Russo, Elena Rebellato, Giada Munari, Andrea Moreno-Manuel, Carmine De Angelis, Claudio Zamagni, Giorgio Valabrega, Umberto Malapelle, Giancarlo Troncone, Massimo Barberis, Antonino Iaccarino
{"title":"卵巢癌内部同源重组缺陷检测:意大利多机构试点研究。","authors":"Francesco Pepe, Elena Guerini-Rocco, Matteo Fassan, Nicola Fusco, Davide Vacirca, Alberto Ranghiero, Konstantinos Venetis, Alessandra Rappa, Sergio Vincenzo Taormina, Gianluca Russo, Elena Rebellato, Giada Munari, Andrea Moreno-Manuel, Carmine De Angelis, Claudio Zamagni, Giorgio Valabrega, Umberto Malapelle, Giancarlo Troncone, Massimo Barberis, Antonino Iaccarino","doi":"10.1136/jcp-2023-208852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPIs) represent a standard of care for the clinical management of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). The recognition of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) has emerged as a predictive biomarker of response for first-line PARPIs treatment in patients with HGOSC. On the other hand, this test is extremely complex and therefore it is often externalised. Regrettably, the reliability of outsourced HRD testing can be troubled by inconclusive results and high rejection rates. In this methodological study, we assessed the technical feasibility, interassay and interlaboratory reproducibility of in-house HRD testing using three different commercially available next-generation sequencing assays.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of n=20 epithelial ovarian cancer samples previously analysed with MyChoice CDx were subjected to HRD retesting using three different platforms in three different major pathology laboratories, that is, SOPHiA DDM HRD Solution, HRD focus and Oncomine homologous recombination repair pathway predesigned panel. Concordance was calculated by Cohen's (dual) and Fleiss (triple) κ coefficients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In-house <i>BRCA1/2</i> molecular testing yielded a concordance rate >90.0% among all participating centres. HRD scores were successfully calculated by each institution with a concordance rate of 76.5%. Concerning the external gold standard test, the overall percentage of agreement ranged from 80.0% to 90.0% with a positive percentage agreement ranging from 75.0% to 80.0% and a negative percentage agreement ranging from 80.0% to 100%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In-house testing for HRD can be reliably performed with commercially available next-generation sequencing assays.</p>","PeriodicalId":15391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"478-485"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11228191/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In-house homologous recombination deficiency testing in ovarian cancer: a multi-institutional Italian pilot study.\",\"authors\":\"Francesco Pepe, Elena Guerini-Rocco, Matteo Fassan, Nicola Fusco, Davide Vacirca, Alberto Ranghiero, Konstantinos Venetis, Alessandra Rappa, Sergio Vincenzo Taormina, Gianluca Russo, Elena Rebellato, Giada Munari, Andrea Moreno-Manuel, Carmine De Angelis, Claudio Zamagni, Giorgio Valabrega, Umberto Malapelle, Giancarlo Troncone, Massimo Barberis, Antonino Iaccarino\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jcp-2023-208852\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPIs) represent a standard of care for the clinical management of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). The recognition of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) has emerged as a predictive biomarker of response for first-line PARPIs treatment in patients with HGOSC. On the other hand, this test is extremely complex and therefore it is often externalised. Regrettably, the reliability of outsourced HRD testing can be troubled by inconclusive results and high rejection rates. In this methodological study, we assessed the technical feasibility, interassay and interlaboratory reproducibility of in-house HRD testing using three different commercially available next-generation sequencing assays.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of n=20 epithelial ovarian cancer samples previously analysed with MyChoice CDx were subjected to HRD retesting using three different platforms in three different major pathology laboratories, that is, SOPHiA DDM HRD Solution, HRD focus and Oncomine homologous recombination repair pathway predesigned panel. Concordance was calculated by Cohen's (dual) and Fleiss (triple) κ coefficients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In-house <i>BRCA1/2</i> molecular testing yielded a concordance rate >90.0% among all participating centres. HRD scores were successfully calculated by each institution with a concordance rate of 76.5%. Concerning the external gold standard test, the overall percentage of agreement ranged from 80.0% to 90.0% with a positive percentage agreement ranging from 75.0% to 80.0% and a negative percentage agreement ranging from 80.0% to 100%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In-house testing for HRD can be reliably performed with commercially available next-generation sequencing assays.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Pathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"478-485\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11228191/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp-2023-208852\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp-2023-208852","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
In-house homologous recombination deficiency testing in ovarian cancer: a multi-institutional Italian pilot study.
Aims: Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPIs) represent a standard of care for the clinical management of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). The recognition of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) has emerged as a predictive biomarker of response for first-line PARPIs treatment in patients with HGOSC. On the other hand, this test is extremely complex and therefore it is often externalised. Regrettably, the reliability of outsourced HRD testing can be troubled by inconclusive results and high rejection rates. In this methodological study, we assessed the technical feasibility, interassay and interlaboratory reproducibility of in-house HRD testing using three different commercially available next-generation sequencing assays.
Methods: A total of n=20 epithelial ovarian cancer samples previously analysed with MyChoice CDx were subjected to HRD retesting using three different platforms in three different major pathology laboratories, that is, SOPHiA DDM HRD Solution, HRD focus and Oncomine homologous recombination repair pathway predesigned panel. Concordance was calculated by Cohen's (dual) and Fleiss (triple) κ coefficients.
Results: In-house BRCA1/2 molecular testing yielded a concordance rate >90.0% among all participating centres. HRD scores were successfully calculated by each institution with a concordance rate of 76.5%. Concerning the external gold standard test, the overall percentage of agreement ranged from 80.0% to 90.0% with a positive percentage agreement ranging from 75.0% to 80.0% and a negative percentage agreement ranging from 80.0% to 100%.
Conclusions: In-house testing for HRD can be reliably performed with commercially available next-generation sequencing assays.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical Pathology is a leading international journal covering all aspects of pathology. Diagnostic and research areas covered include histopathology, virology, haematology, microbiology, cytopathology, chemical pathology, molecular pathology, forensic pathology, dermatopathology, neuropathology and immunopathology. Each issue contains Reviews, Original articles, Short reports, Correspondence and more.