堕胎:来自APA前任主席的观点。

Q4 Psychology
Nada L Stotland
{"title":"堕胎:来自APA前任主席的观点。","authors":"Nada L Stotland","doi":"10.1521/pdps.2023.51.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The United States Supreme Court's decision in <i>Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization,</i> eliminating the national right to abortion, poses challenges to psychiatrists and patients. Abortion laws now vary widely from state to state and are constantly changing and being challenged. The laws affect both patients and health care professionals; some prohibit not only the performance of abortion but efforts to inform and assist patients seeking abortion. Patients may become pregnant during and/or because of episodes of clinical depression, mania, or psychosis, and recognize that their current circumstances will not allow them to become adequate parents. Some laws allowing abortion to protect a woman's life or health explicitly exclude mental health risks; many prohibit transfer of a patient to a permissive venue. Psychiatrists working with patients contemplating abortion can convey the scientific evidence that abortion does not cause mental illness and help them identify and work through their own beliefs, values, and likely responses to the decision. Psychiatrists will also have to decide whether medical ethics or state laws will govern their own professional behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":38518,"journal":{"name":"Psychodynamic Psychiatry","volume":"51 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abortion: Perspectives from an APA Past-President.\",\"authors\":\"Nada L Stotland\",\"doi\":\"10.1521/pdps.2023.51.1.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The United States Supreme Court's decision in <i>Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization,</i> eliminating the national right to abortion, poses challenges to psychiatrists and patients. Abortion laws now vary widely from state to state and are constantly changing and being challenged. The laws affect both patients and health care professionals; some prohibit not only the performance of abortion but efforts to inform and assist patients seeking abortion. Patients may become pregnant during and/or because of episodes of clinical depression, mania, or psychosis, and recognize that their current circumstances will not allow them to become adequate parents. Some laws allowing abortion to protect a woman's life or health explicitly exclude mental health risks; many prohibit transfer of a patient to a permissive venue. Psychiatrists working with patients contemplating abortion can convey the scientific evidence that abortion does not cause mental illness and help them identify and work through their own beliefs, values, and likely responses to the decision. Psychiatrists will also have to decide whether medical ethics or state laws will govern their own professional behavior.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychodynamic Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"1-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychodynamic Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1521/pdps.2023.51.1.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychodynamic Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1521/pdps.2023.51.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国最高法院在“多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织”一案中取消了全国堕胎权,这给精神科医生和患者带来了挑战。现在,各州的堕胎法差别很大,而且还在不断变化和受到挑战。这些法律对病人和保健专业人员都有影响;有些法律不仅禁止堕胎,还禁止告知和帮助寻求堕胎的病人。患者可能在临床抑郁、躁狂或精神病发作期间和/或由于发作而怀孕,并认识到他们目前的情况不允许他们成为合格的父母。为保护妇女的生命或健康而允许堕胎的一些法律明确排除了精神健康风险;许多国家禁止将病人转移到允许的地点。精神科医生与考虑堕胎的病人一起工作,可以传达堕胎不会导致精神疾病的科学证据,并帮助他们识别和解决自己的信仰、价值观和对决定的可能反应。精神科医生还必须决定,他们的职业行为是由医学伦理还是国家法律来规范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Abortion: Perspectives from an APA Past-President.

The United States Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, eliminating the national right to abortion, poses challenges to psychiatrists and patients. Abortion laws now vary widely from state to state and are constantly changing and being challenged. The laws affect both patients and health care professionals; some prohibit not only the performance of abortion but efforts to inform and assist patients seeking abortion. Patients may become pregnant during and/or because of episodes of clinical depression, mania, or psychosis, and recognize that their current circumstances will not allow them to become adequate parents. Some laws allowing abortion to protect a woman's life or health explicitly exclude mental health risks; many prohibit transfer of a patient to a permissive venue. Psychiatrists working with patients contemplating abortion can convey the scientific evidence that abortion does not cause mental illness and help them identify and work through their own beliefs, values, and likely responses to the decision. Psychiatrists will also have to decide whether medical ethics or state laws will govern their own professional behavior.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychodynamic Psychiatry
Psychodynamic Psychiatry Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信