移情的自我评估揭示了轻度认知障碍中自我意识的缺陷。

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Neuropsychology Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-16 DOI:10.1037/neu0000896
Davide Quaranta, Chiara Cerami, Naike Caraglia, Emanuele Maria Costantini, Sonia Di Tella, Maria Caterina Silveri, Stefano Cappa, Simona Gaudino, Camillo Marra, Alessandra Dodich
{"title":"移情的自我评估揭示了轻度认知障碍中自我意识的缺陷。","authors":"Davide Quaranta, Chiara Cerami, Naike Caraglia, Emanuele Maria Costantini, Sonia Di Tella, Maria Caterina Silveri, Stefano Cappa, Simona Gaudino, Camillo Marra, Alessandra Dodich","doi":"10.1037/neu0000896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Self-assessment scales are broadly used to evaluate empathy in neurological patients, but it is conceivable that some discrepancy with caregiver evaluation may emerge as consequence of reduced self-awareness. The aim of the present study was to verify the presence of discrepancies in the self-assessment of empathy in subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and to explore their neural correlates.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twenty MCI patients and 38 healthy controls (HCs) underwent the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI), exploring the following four aspects of empathy: perspective taking (PT), fantasy, empathic concern, and personal distress. The questionnaire was administered in two modalities: self-administered, and administered to an informant, and the scores were compared. The correlation between discrepancies and regional cortical thickness was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The self-administered version of IRI showed higher PT scores in MCI as compared to HC (<i>p</i> = .017), with no differences detected in the other subscales. The difference between the scores obtained in the self-administered and in the informant-administered IRI-PT was significantly higher in MCI than in HCs (<i>p</i> = .006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The self-assessment of empathy in subjects with MCI may be misleading because of a tendency toward an overestimation of the PT ability, typically considered as a cognitive component of empathy. Our results may reflect a particular aspect of reduced self-awareness in MCI subjects. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":19205,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-assessment of empathy uncovers defective self-awareness in mild cognitive impairment.\",\"authors\":\"Davide Quaranta, Chiara Cerami, Naike Caraglia, Emanuele Maria Costantini, Sonia Di Tella, Maria Caterina Silveri, Stefano Cappa, Simona Gaudino, Camillo Marra, Alessandra Dodich\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/neu0000896\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Self-assessment scales are broadly used to evaluate empathy in neurological patients, but it is conceivable that some discrepancy with caregiver evaluation may emerge as consequence of reduced self-awareness. The aim of the present study was to verify the presence of discrepancies in the self-assessment of empathy in subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and to explore their neural correlates.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twenty MCI patients and 38 healthy controls (HCs) underwent the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI), exploring the following four aspects of empathy: perspective taking (PT), fantasy, empathic concern, and personal distress. The questionnaire was administered in two modalities: self-administered, and administered to an informant, and the scores were compared. The correlation between discrepancies and regional cortical thickness was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The self-administered version of IRI showed higher PT scores in MCI as compared to HC (<i>p</i> = .017), with no differences detected in the other subscales. The difference between the scores obtained in the self-administered and in the informant-administered IRI-PT was significantly higher in MCI than in HCs (<i>p</i> = .006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The self-assessment of empathy in subjects with MCI may be misleading because of a tendency toward an overestimation of the PT ability, typically considered as a cognitive component of empathy. Our results may reflect a particular aspect of reduced self-awareness in MCI subjects. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuropsychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuropsychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000896\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/3/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000896","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:自我评估量表被广泛用于评估神经系统患者的同理心,但可以想象,由于自我意识的降低,可能会出现与照顾者评估的一些差异。本研究的目的是验证轻度认知障碍(MCI)受试者在移情自我评估中是否存在差异,并探讨其神经相关性。方法:对20名MCI患者和38名健康对照(HC)进行人际反应指数(IRI)测试,探讨移情的四个方面:视角转换(PT)、幻想、移情关怀和个人痛苦。问卷采用两种方式进行管理:自我管理和由线人管理,并对得分进行比较。评估差异与区域皮质厚度之间的相关性。结果:与HC相比,自我管理版本的IRI在MCI中显示出更高的PT得分(p=.017),在其他分量表中没有发现差异。自我管理和线人管理的IRI-PT在MCI中获得的分数之间的差异显著高于HC(p=0.006)。结论:MCI受试者的移情自我评估可能具有误导性,因为PT能力往往被高估,通常被认为是移情的认知组成部分。我们的研究结果可能反映了MCI受试者自我意识下降的一个特定方面。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Self-assessment of empathy uncovers defective self-awareness in mild cognitive impairment.

Objective: Self-assessment scales are broadly used to evaluate empathy in neurological patients, but it is conceivable that some discrepancy with caregiver evaluation may emerge as consequence of reduced self-awareness. The aim of the present study was to verify the presence of discrepancies in the self-assessment of empathy in subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and to explore their neural correlates.

Method: Twenty MCI patients and 38 healthy controls (HCs) underwent the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI), exploring the following four aspects of empathy: perspective taking (PT), fantasy, empathic concern, and personal distress. The questionnaire was administered in two modalities: self-administered, and administered to an informant, and the scores were compared. The correlation between discrepancies and regional cortical thickness was assessed.

Results: The self-administered version of IRI showed higher PT scores in MCI as compared to HC (p = .017), with no differences detected in the other subscales. The difference between the scores obtained in the self-administered and in the informant-administered IRI-PT was significantly higher in MCI than in HCs (p = .006).

Conclusion: The self-assessment of empathy in subjects with MCI may be misleading because of a tendency toward an overestimation of the PT ability, typically considered as a cognitive component of empathy. Our results may reflect a particular aspect of reduced self-awareness in MCI subjects. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuropsychology
Neuropsychology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
132
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuropsychology publishes original, empirical research; systematic reviews and meta-analyses; and theoretical articles on the relation between brain and human cognitive, emotional, and behavioral function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信