在 COVID-19 大流行期间对医护人员的社会心理干预:快速回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-16 DOI:10.1007/s10354-023-01013-9
Manuela Hoedl, Selvedina Osmancevic, Nina Thonhofer, Lea Reiter, Daniela Schoberer
{"title":"在 COVID-19 大流行期间对医护人员的社会心理干预:快速回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Manuela Hoedl, Selvedina Osmancevic, Nina Thonhofer, Lea Reiter, Daniela Schoberer","doi":"10.1007/s10354-023-01013-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This rapid review was conducted by following a predefined protocol developed by the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group. A total of 172 potential reviews and 167 primary studies of interest were found. AMSTAR II was used to assess the quality of the included reviews and the JBI Checklist for Randomized Controlled Trials for primary studies. Overall, four studies were included in this review. The study quality ranged from 5 to 12 out of 13 possible stars. No robust evidence was found that psychosocial interventions can reduce psychological distress. No significant effect could be found regarding post-traumatic stress. Two studies on anxiety were identified, one which showed an effect and another which did not. The psychosocial intervention had no beneficial effect on burnout and depression, whereas providing a mindfulness- or relaxation-based intervention resulted in a significant improvement in sleep quality. By considering the secondary results and results of previous reviews, a combination of training and mindfulness seems to be beneficial for decreasing anxiety and stress in home care workers. In summary, the evidence-based recommendations are still limited and, therefore, more evidence is needed to make a general statement of high certainty about the effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":23882,"journal":{"name":"Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10185947/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychosocial interventions for healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: rapid review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Manuela Hoedl, Selvedina Osmancevic, Nina Thonhofer, Lea Reiter, Daniela Schoberer\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10354-023-01013-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This rapid review was conducted by following a predefined protocol developed by the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group. A total of 172 potential reviews and 167 primary studies of interest were found. AMSTAR II was used to assess the quality of the included reviews and the JBI Checklist for Randomized Controlled Trials for primary studies. Overall, four studies were included in this review. The study quality ranged from 5 to 12 out of 13 possible stars. No robust evidence was found that psychosocial interventions can reduce psychological distress. No significant effect could be found regarding post-traumatic stress. Two studies on anxiety were identified, one which showed an effect and another which did not. The psychosocial intervention had no beneficial effect on burnout and depression, whereas providing a mindfulness- or relaxation-based intervention resulted in a significant improvement in sleep quality. By considering the secondary results and results of previous reviews, a combination of training and mindfulness seems to be beneficial for decreasing anxiety and stress in home care workers. In summary, the evidence-based recommendations are still limited and, therefore, more evidence is needed to make a general statement of high certainty about the effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10185947/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10354-023-01013-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/5/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10354-023-01013-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本快速综述是按照科克伦快速综述方法小组制定的预定方案进行的。共发现了 172 篇潜在综述和 167 项主要相关研究。AMSTAR II 用于评估纳入综述的质量,JBI 随机对照试验核对表用于评估主要研究的质量。本综述共纳入了四项研究。在 13 颗星中,研究质量从 5 颗星到 12 颗星不等。没有发现有力的证据表明心理干预可以减轻心理困扰。在创伤后应激方面没有发现明显的效果。有两项关于焦虑的研究,一项显示了效果,另一项则没有。社会心理干预对职业倦怠和抑郁没有有益的影响,而以正念或放松为基础的干预则显著改善了睡眠质量。考虑到次要结果和之前的综述结果,培训和正念的结合似乎对减少家庭护理人员的焦虑和压力有益。总之,基于证据的建议仍然有限,因此需要更多的证据才能对其效果做出高度确定的一般性声明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Psychosocial interventions for healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: rapid review and meta-analysis.

Psychosocial interventions for healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: rapid review and meta-analysis.

Psychosocial interventions for healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: rapid review and meta-analysis.

This rapid review was conducted by following a predefined protocol developed by the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group. A total of 172 potential reviews and 167 primary studies of interest were found. AMSTAR II was used to assess the quality of the included reviews and the JBI Checklist for Randomized Controlled Trials for primary studies. Overall, four studies were included in this review. The study quality ranged from 5 to 12 out of 13 possible stars. No robust evidence was found that psychosocial interventions can reduce psychological distress. No significant effect could be found regarding post-traumatic stress. Two studies on anxiety were identified, one which showed an effect and another which did not. The psychosocial intervention had no beneficial effect on burnout and depression, whereas providing a mindfulness- or relaxation-based intervention resulted in a significant improvement in sleep quality. By considering the secondary results and results of previous reviews, a combination of training and mindfulness seems to be beneficial for decreasing anxiety and stress in home care workers. In summary, the evidence-based recommendations are still limited and, therefore, more evidence is needed to make a general statement of high certainty about the effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift
Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
期刊介绍: ''From the microscope to clinical application!'', Scientists from all European countries make available their recent research results and practical experience through Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift, the renowned English- and German-language forum. Both original articles and reviews on a broad spectrum of clinical and preclinical medicine are presented within the successful framework of thematic issues compiled by guest editors. Selected cutting-edge topics, such as dementia, geriatric oncology, Helicobacter pylori and phytomedicine make the journal a mandatory source of information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信