乳腺切除术后放疗:丸厚及照射技术对皮肤剂量的影响。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Frédéric A Miéville, Nicolas Pitteloud, Vérane Achard, Giorgio Lamanna, Olivier Pisaturo, Pierre-Alain Tercier, Abdelkarim S Allal
{"title":"乳腺切除术后放疗:丸厚及照射技术对皮肤剂量的影响。","authors":"Frédéric A Miéville,&nbsp;Nicolas Pitteloud,&nbsp;Vérane Achard,&nbsp;Giorgio Lamanna,&nbsp;Olivier Pisaturo,&nbsp;Pierre-Alain Tercier,&nbsp;Abdelkarim S Allal","doi":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.03.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine 10 MV IMRT and VMAT based protocols with a daily bolus targeting a skin dose of 45 Gy in order to replace the 6 MV tangential fields with a 5 mm thick bolus on alternate days method for post-mastectomy radiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We measured the mean surface dose along the chest wall PTV as a function of different bolus thicknesses for sliding window IMRT and VMAT plans. We analyzed surface dose profiles and dose homogeneities and compared them to our standard 6 MV strategy. All measurements were performed on a thorax phantom with Gafchromic films while dosimetric plans were computed using the Acuros XB algorithm (Varian).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We obtained the best compromise between measured surface dose (mean dose and homogeneity) and skin toxicity threshold obtained from the literature using a daily 3 mm thick bolus. Mean surface doses were 91.4 ± 2.8% [85.7% - 95.4%] and 92.2 ± 2.3% [85.6% - 95.2%] of the prescribed dose with IMRT and VMAT techniques, respectively. Our standard 6 MV alternate days 5 mm thick bolus leads to 89.0 ± 3.7% [83.6% - 95.5%]. Mean dose differences between measured and TPS results were < 3.2% for depths as low as 2 mm depth.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>10 MV IMRT-based protocols with a daily 3 mm thick bolus produce a surface dose comparable to the standard 6 MV 5 mm thick bolus on alternate days method but with an improved surface dose homogeneity. This allows for a better control of skin toxicity and target volume coverage.</p>","PeriodicalId":54397,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post-mastectomy radiotherapy: Impact of bolus thickness and irradiation technique on skin dose.\",\"authors\":\"Frédéric A Miéville,&nbsp;Nicolas Pitteloud,&nbsp;Vérane Achard,&nbsp;Giorgio Lamanna,&nbsp;Olivier Pisaturo,&nbsp;Pierre-Alain Tercier,&nbsp;Abdelkarim S Allal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.03.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine 10 MV IMRT and VMAT based protocols with a daily bolus targeting a skin dose of 45 Gy in order to replace the 6 MV tangential fields with a 5 mm thick bolus on alternate days method for post-mastectomy radiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We measured the mean surface dose along the chest wall PTV as a function of different bolus thicknesses for sliding window IMRT and VMAT plans. We analyzed surface dose profiles and dose homogeneities and compared them to our standard 6 MV strategy. All measurements were performed on a thorax phantom with Gafchromic films while dosimetric plans were computed using the Acuros XB algorithm (Varian).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We obtained the best compromise between measured surface dose (mean dose and homogeneity) and skin toxicity threshold obtained from the literature using a daily 3 mm thick bolus. Mean surface doses were 91.4 ± 2.8% [85.7% - 95.4%] and 92.2 ± 2.3% [85.6% - 95.2%] of the prescribed dose with IMRT and VMAT techniques, respectively. Our standard 6 MV alternate days 5 mm thick bolus leads to 89.0 ± 3.7% [83.6% - 95.5%]. Mean dose differences between measured and TPS results were < 3.2% for depths as low as 2 mm depth.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>10 MV IMRT-based protocols with a daily 3 mm thick bolus produce a surface dose comparable to the standard 6 MV 5 mm thick bolus on alternate days method but with an improved surface dose homogeneity. This allows for a better control of skin toxicity and target volume coverage.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.03.004\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.03.004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:确定基于10 MV IMRT和VMAT的方案,每日丸剂靶向45 Gy的皮肤剂量,以隔天5 mm厚丸剂替代6 MV切向场,用于乳房切除术后放疗。方法:我们测量了滑动窗IMRT和VMAT方案的胸壁PTV平均表面剂量随不同剂量厚度的变化。我们分析了表面剂量分布和剂量均匀性,并将它们与我们的标准6 MV策略进行了比较。使用Gafchromic薄膜在胸腔假体上进行所有测量,同时使用acros XB算法(Varian)计算剂量计划。结果:我们获得了测量表面剂量(平均剂量和均匀性)和皮肤毒性阈值之间的最佳折衷,使用每日3 mm厚的丸。IMRT和VMAT技术的平均表面剂量分别为处方剂量的91.4 ± 2.8%[85.7% - 95.4%]和92.2 ± 2.3%[85.6% - 95.2%]。我们的标准6 MV隔天5 mm厚的丸剂导致89.0 ± 3.7%[83.6% - 95.5%]。对于低至2 mm的深度,测量结果与TPS结果之间的平均剂量差异< 3.2%。结论:基于10 毫伏imrt的方案,每天3 毫米厚的丸剂产生的表面剂量与标准的6 毫伏5 毫米厚隔日丸剂方法相当,但表面剂量均匀性有所改善。这允许更好地控制皮肤毒性和目标体积覆盖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Post-mastectomy radiotherapy: Impact of bolus thickness and irradiation technique on skin dose.

Purpose: To determine 10 MV IMRT and VMAT based protocols with a daily bolus targeting a skin dose of 45 Gy in order to replace the 6 MV tangential fields with a 5 mm thick bolus on alternate days method for post-mastectomy radiotherapy.

Method: We measured the mean surface dose along the chest wall PTV as a function of different bolus thicknesses for sliding window IMRT and VMAT plans. We analyzed surface dose profiles and dose homogeneities and compared them to our standard 6 MV strategy. All measurements were performed on a thorax phantom with Gafchromic films while dosimetric plans were computed using the Acuros XB algorithm (Varian).

Results: We obtained the best compromise between measured surface dose (mean dose and homogeneity) and skin toxicity threshold obtained from the literature using a daily 3 mm thick bolus. Mean surface doses were 91.4 ± 2.8% [85.7% - 95.4%] and 92.2 ± 2.3% [85.6% - 95.2%] of the prescribed dose with IMRT and VMAT techniques, respectively. Our standard 6 MV alternate days 5 mm thick bolus leads to 89.0 ± 3.7% [83.6% - 95.5%]. Mean dose differences between measured and TPS results were < 3.2% for depths as low as 2 mm depth.

Conclusion: 10 MV IMRT-based protocols with a daily 3 mm thick bolus produce a surface dose comparable to the standard 6 MV 5 mm thick bolus on alternate days method but with an improved surface dose homogeneity. This allows for a better control of skin toxicity and target volume coverage.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik (Journal of Medical Physics) is an official organ of the German and Austrian Society of Medical Physic and the Swiss Society of Radiobiology and Medical Physics.The Journal is a platform for basic research and practical applications of physical procedures in medical diagnostics and therapy. The articles are reviewed following international standards of peer reviewing. Focuses of the articles are: -Biophysical methods in radiation therapy and nuclear medicine -Dosimetry and radiation protection -Radiological diagnostics and quality assurance -Modern imaging techniques, such as computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography -Ultrasonography diagnostics, application of laser and UV rays -Electronic processing of biosignals -Artificial intelligence and machine learning in medical physics In the Journal, the latest scientific insights find their expression in the form of original articles, reviews, technical communications, and information for the clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信