Alessandro Abate, Haniel Barbosa, Clark Barrett, Cristina David, Pascal Kesseli, Daniel Kroening, Elizabeth Polgreen, Andrew Reynolds, Cesare Tinelli
{"title":"合成具有非平凡常数的程序。","authors":"Alessandro Abate, Haniel Barbosa, Clark Barrett, Cristina David, Pascal Kesseli, Daniel Kroening, Elizabeth Polgreen, Andrew Reynolds, Cesare Tinelli","doi":"10.1007/s10817-023-09664-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Program synthesis is the mechanised construction of software. One of the main difficulties is the efficient exploration of the very large solution space, and tools often require a user-provided syntactic restriction of the search space. While useful in general, such syntactic restrictions provide little help for the generation of programs that contain non-trivial constants, unless the user is able to provide the constants in advance. This is a fundamentally difficult task for state-of-the-art synthesisers. We propose a new approach to the synthesis of programs with non-trivial constants that combines the strengths of a counterexample-guided inductive synthesiser with those of a theory solver, exploring the solution space more efficiently without relying on user guidance. We call this approach CEGIS(<math><mi>T</mi></math>), where <math><mi>T</mi></math> is a first-order theory. We present two exemplars, one based on Fourier-Motzkin (FM) variable elimination and one based on first-order satisfiability. We demonstrate the practical value of CEGIS(<math><mi>T</mi></math>) by automatically synthesising programs for a set of intricate benchmarks. Additionally, we present a case study where we integrate CEGIS(<math><mi>T</mi></math>) within the mature synthesiser CVC4 and show that CEGIS(<math><mi>T</mi></math>) improves CVC4's results.</p>","PeriodicalId":15082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Automated Reasoning","volume":"67 2","pages":"19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10182957/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Synthesising Programs with Non-trivial Constants.\",\"authors\":\"Alessandro Abate, Haniel Barbosa, Clark Barrett, Cristina David, Pascal Kesseli, Daniel Kroening, Elizabeth Polgreen, Andrew Reynolds, Cesare Tinelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10817-023-09664-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Program synthesis is the mechanised construction of software. One of the main difficulties is the efficient exploration of the very large solution space, and tools often require a user-provided syntactic restriction of the search space. While useful in general, such syntactic restrictions provide little help for the generation of programs that contain non-trivial constants, unless the user is able to provide the constants in advance. This is a fundamentally difficult task for state-of-the-art synthesisers. We propose a new approach to the synthesis of programs with non-trivial constants that combines the strengths of a counterexample-guided inductive synthesiser with those of a theory solver, exploring the solution space more efficiently without relying on user guidance. We call this approach CEGIS(<math><mi>T</mi></math>), where <math><mi>T</mi></math> is a first-order theory. We present two exemplars, one based on Fourier-Motzkin (FM) variable elimination and one based on first-order satisfiability. We demonstrate the practical value of CEGIS(<math><mi>T</mi></math>) by automatically synthesising programs for a set of intricate benchmarks. Additionally, we present a case study where we integrate CEGIS(<math><mi>T</mi></math>) within the mature synthesiser CVC4 and show that CEGIS(<math><mi>T</mi></math>) improves CVC4's results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Automated Reasoning\",\"volume\":\"67 2\",\"pages\":\"19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10182957/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Automated Reasoning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10817-023-09664-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/5/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Automated Reasoning","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10817-023-09664-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Program synthesis is the mechanised construction of software. One of the main difficulties is the efficient exploration of the very large solution space, and tools often require a user-provided syntactic restriction of the search space. While useful in general, such syntactic restrictions provide little help for the generation of programs that contain non-trivial constants, unless the user is able to provide the constants in advance. This is a fundamentally difficult task for state-of-the-art synthesisers. We propose a new approach to the synthesis of programs with non-trivial constants that combines the strengths of a counterexample-guided inductive synthesiser with those of a theory solver, exploring the solution space more efficiently without relying on user guidance. We call this approach CEGIS(), where is a first-order theory. We present two exemplars, one based on Fourier-Motzkin (FM) variable elimination and one based on first-order satisfiability. We demonstrate the practical value of CEGIS() by automatically synthesising programs for a set of intricate benchmarks. Additionally, we present a case study where we integrate CEGIS() within the mature synthesiser CVC4 and show that CEGIS() improves CVC4's results.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Automated Reasoning is an interdisciplinary journal that maintains a balance between theory, implementation and application. The spectrum of material published ranges from the presentation of a new inference rule with proof of its logical properties to a detailed account of a computer program designed to solve various problems in industry. The main fields covered are automated theorem proving, logic programming, expert systems, program synthesis and validation, artificial intelligence, computational logic, robotics, and various industrial applications. The papers share the common feature of focusing on several aspects of automated reasoning, a field whose objective is the design and implementation of a computer program that serves as an assistant in solving problems and in answering questions that require reasoning.
The Journal of Automated Reasoning provides a forum and a means for exchanging information for those interested purely in theory, those interested primarily in implementation, and those interested in specific research and industrial applications.