不同长度的氧化锆和纤维桩对使用氧化锆冠修复的上颌中切牙断裂强度的影响:体外研究。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Tetore Olloni, Teuta Pustina Krasniqui, Edit Xhajanka
{"title":"不同长度的氧化锆和纤维桩对使用氧化锆冠修复的上颌中切牙断裂强度的影响:体外研究。","authors":"Tetore Olloni, Teuta Pustina Krasniqui, Edit Xhajanka","doi":"10.3290/j.ijcd.b3963385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Endodontically treated teeth are more susceptible to fractures than vital teeth because of significant coronal and radicular dentin loss during endodontic therapeutic procedures. The objective of the present in vitro study was to estimate and compare the influence of the post length and type on the fracture strength of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Sixty extracted human maxillary central incisors were decoronated 2 mm above the cementoenamel junction. The teeth were selected and subjected to standard endodontic treatment, resulting in three groups with different preparation lengths: 5, 7.5, and 10 mm. Each group was randomly divided into two subgroups according to the post type: zirconia or fiber. After appropriate surface treatment, they were cemented with adhesive resin cement and restored with zirconia crowns. Thermocycling (5°C to 55°C, 60 s, 1500 cycles) was performed after cementing the zirconia crowns onto each tooth. Prepared samples were subjected to a compressive static load of 0.5 mm/min, at an angle of 130 degrees to the long axis of the roots, using a universal testing machine (Matest) at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min, until fracture. The significance of the results was assessed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey-Kramer test (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ANOVA analysis indicated significant differences (P < 0.05) between the groups. The Tukey-Kramer test revealed no significant differences among the zirconia posts with lengths of 5 mm (26.5 N ± 13.4), 7.5 mm (25.2 N ± 13.9), and 10 mm (17.1 N ± 5.2). Also, in the fiber post group, there was no significant difference when the posts with lengths of 7.5 mm (13.4 N ± 11.0) were compared with those of 5 mm (6.9 N ± 4.6) and 10 mm (31.7 N ± 13.1). The 10-mm-long post displayed superior fracture strength, and the 5-mm-long post showed significantly lower mean values (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The fracture strength of zirconia posts (with lengths of 5 and 7.5 mm) was found to be significantly higher than that of fiber posts (with lengths of 5 and 7.5 mm). The 10-mm-long fiber post group demonstrated significantly higher fracture strength values, and the 5-mm-long fiber post group showed the lowest values for the force resulting in root fracture; these groups were significantly different from each other (P < 0.001). The fracture strength analysis with a universal testing machine is the only method that enables the estimation of the differences between zirconia and fiber posts with different lengths in endodontically treated teeth.</p>","PeriodicalId":48666,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Computerized Dentistry","volume":"0 0","pages":"161-167"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The influence of zirconia and fiber posts with different lengths on the fracture strength of maxillary central incisors restored with zirconia crowns: an in vitro study.\",\"authors\":\"Tetore Olloni, Teuta Pustina Krasniqui, Edit Xhajanka\",\"doi\":\"10.3290/j.ijcd.b3963385\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Endodontically treated teeth are more susceptible to fractures than vital teeth because of significant coronal and radicular dentin loss during endodontic therapeutic procedures. The objective of the present in vitro study was to estimate and compare the influence of the post length and type on the fracture strength of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Sixty extracted human maxillary central incisors were decoronated 2 mm above the cementoenamel junction. The teeth were selected and subjected to standard endodontic treatment, resulting in three groups with different preparation lengths: 5, 7.5, and 10 mm. Each group was randomly divided into two subgroups according to the post type: zirconia or fiber. After appropriate surface treatment, they were cemented with adhesive resin cement and restored with zirconia crowns. Thermocycling (5°C to 55°C, 60 s, 1500 cycles) was performed after cementing the zirconia crowns onto each tooth. Prepared samples were subjected to a compressive static load of 0.5 mm/min, at an angle of 130 degrees to the long axis of the roots, using a universal testing machine (Matest) at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min, until fracture. The significance of the results was assessed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey-Kramer test (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ANOVA analysis indicated significant differences (P < 0.05) between the groups. The Tukey-Kramer test revealed no significant differences among the zirconia posts with lengths of 5 mm (26.5 N ± 13.4), 7.5 mm (25.2 N ± 13.9), and 10 mm (17.1 N ± 5.2). Also, in the fiber post group, there was no significant difference when the posts with lengths of 7.5 mm (13.4 N ± 11.0) were compared with those of 5 mm (6.9 N ± 4.6) and 10 mm (31.7 N ± 13.1). The 10-mm-long post displayed superior fracture strength, and the 5-mm-long post showed significantly lower mean values (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The fracture strength of zirconia posts (with lengths of 5 and 7.5 mm) was found to be significantly higher than that of fiber posts (with lengths of 5 and 7.5 mm). The 10-mm-long fiber post group demonstrated significantly higher fracture strength values, and the 5-mm-long fiber post group showed the lowest values for the force resulting in root fracture; these groups were significantly different from each other (P < 0.001). The fracture strength analysis with a universal testing machine is the only method that enables the estimation of the differences between zirconia and fiber posts with different lengths in endodontically treated teeth.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48666,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Computerized Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"0 0\",\"pages\":\"161-167\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Computerized Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.ijcd.b3963385\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Computerized Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.ijcd.b3963385","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:由于在牙髓治疗过程中冠状和根状牙本质会大量脱落,因此牙髓治疗过的牙齿比重要牙齿更容易发生折断。本体外研究的目的是估计和比较牙柱长度和类型对根管治疗上颌中切牙折断强度的影响:对 60 颗拔出的上颌中切牙在牙本质釉质交界处上方 2 毫米处进行装饰。选择这些牙齿并对其进行标准的牙髓治疗,结果分为三组,每组的预备长度不同:5 毫米、7.5 毫米和 10 毫米。根据牙柱类型(氧化锆或纤维),每组随机分为两个亚组。经过适当的表面处理后,用粘接树脂水门汀粘接,并用氧化锆冠修复。将氧化锆冠粘结到每颗牙齿上后,进行热循环(5°C 至 55°C,60 秒,1500 个循环)。使用万能试验机(Matest),以 0.5 毫米/分钟的十字头速度对制备好的样品施加与牙根长轴成 130 度角的压缩静载荷,直至断裂。使用双向方差分析(ANOVA)和Tukey-Kramer检验(α = 0.05)评估结果的显著性:方差分析表明,各组之间存在显著差异(P < 0.05)。Tukey-Kramer测试显示,长度为5毫米(26.5牛顿±13.4)、7.5毫米(25.2牛顿±13.9)和10毫米(17.1牛顿±5.2)的氧化锆桩之间没有明显差异。此外,在纤维支柱组中,长度为 7.5 毫米(13.4 牛顿±11.0)的支柱与长度为 5 毫米(6.9 牛顿±4.6)和 10 毫米(31.7 牛顿±13.1)的支柱相比没有明显差异。结论:10 毫米长的柱体显示出更高的断裂强度,而 5 毫米长的柱体显示出明显更低的平均值(P < 0.001):结论:研究发现,氧化锆桩(长度分别为 5 毫米和 7.5 毫米)的断裂强度明显高于纤维桩(长度分别为 5 毫米和 7.5 毫米)。长度为 10 毫米的纤维桩组的断裂强度值明显更高,而长度为 5 毫米的纤维桩组导致牙根断裂的力值最低;这两个组之间存在明显差异(P < 0.001)。使用万能试验机进行断裂强度分析是唯一一种能够估算牙髓治疗牙齿中不同长度氧化锆和纤维桩之间差异的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The influence of zirconia and fiber posts with different lengths on the fracture strength of maxillary central incisors restored with zirconia crowns: an in vitro study.

Aim: Endodontically treated teeth are more susceptible to fractures than vital teeth because of significant coronal and radicular dentin loss during endodontic therapeutic procedures. The objective of the present in vitro study was to estimate and compare the influence of the post length and type on the fracture strength of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors.

Materials and methods: Sixty extracted human maxillary central incisors were decoronated 2 mm above the cementoenamel junction. The teeth were selected and subjected to standard endodontic treatment, resulting in three groups with different preparation lengths: 5, 7.5, and 10 mm. Each group was randomly divided into two subgroups according to the post type: zirconia or fiber. After appropriate surface treatment, they were cemented with adhesive resin cement and restored with zirconia crowns. Thermocycling (5°C to 55°C, 60 s, 1500 cycles) was performed after cementing the zirconia crowns onto each tooth. Prepared samples were subjected to a compressive static load of 0.5 mm/min, at an angle of 130 degrees to the long axis of the roots, using a universal testing machine (Matest) at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min, until fracture. The significance of the results was assessed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey-Kramer test (α = 0.05).

Results: The ANOVA analysis indicated significant differences (P < 0.05) between the groups. The Tukey-Kramer test revealed no significant differences among the zirconia posts with lengths of 5 mm (26.5 N ± 13.4), 7.5 mm (25.2 N ± 13.9), and 10 mm (17.1 N ± 5.2). Also, in the fiber post group, there was no significant difference when the posts with lengths of 7.5 mm (13.4 N ± 11.0) were compared with those of 5 mm (6.9 N ± 4.6) and 10 mm (31.7 N ± 13.1). The 10-mm-long post displayed superior fracture strength, and the 5-mm-long post showed significantly lower mean values (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: The fracture strength of zirconia posts (with lengths of 5 and 7.5 mm) was found to be significantly higher than that of fiber posts (with lengths of 5 and 7.5 mm). The 10-mm-long fiber post group demonstrated significantly higher fracture strength values, and the 5-mm-long fiber post group showed the lowest values for the force resulting in root fracture; these groups were significantly different from each other (P < 0.001). The fracture strength analysis with a universal testing machine is the only method that enables the estimation of the differences between zirconia and fiber posts with different lengths in endodontically treated teeth.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Computerized Dentistry
International Journal of Computerized Dentistry Dentistry-Dentistry (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: This journal explores the myriad innovations in the emerging field of computerized dentistry and how to integrate them into clinical practice. The bulk of the journal is devoted to the science of computer-assisted dentistry, with research articles and clinical reports on all aspects of computer-based diagnostic and therapeutic applications, with special emphasis placed on CAD/CAM and image-processing systems. Articles also address the use of computer-based communication to support patient care, assess the quality of care, and enhance clinical decision making. The journal is presented in a bilingual format, with each issue offering three types of articles: science-based, application-based, and national society reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信