利用交错刺激和脑电图测量人工耳蜗刺激下持续神经反应的时间平滑和增长。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
François Guérit, John M Deeks, Dorothée Arzounian, Robin Gransier, Jan Wouters, Robert P Carlyon
{"title":"利用交错刺激和脑电图测量人工耳蜗刺激下持续神经反应的时间平滑和增长。","authors":"François Guérit,&nbsp;John M Deeks,&nbsp;Dorothée Arzounian,&nbsp;Robin Gransier,&nbsp;Jan Wouters,&nbsp;Robert P Carlyon","doi":"10.1007/s10162-023-00886-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Two EEG experiments measured the sustained neural response to amplitude-modulated (AM) high-rate pulse trains presented to a single cochlear-implant (CI) electrode. Stimuli consisted of two interleaved pulse trains with AM rates F1 and F2 close to 80 and 120 Hz respectively, and where F2 = 1.5F1. Following Carlyon et al. (J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 2021), we assume that such stimuli can produce a neural distortion response (NDR) at F0 = F2-F1 Hz if temporal dependencies (\"smoothing\") in the auditory system are followed by one or more neural nonlinearities. In experiment 1, the rate of each pulse train was 480 pps and the gap between pulses in the F1 and F2 pulse trains ranged from 0 to 984 µs. The NDR had a roughly constant amplitude for gaps between 0 and about 200-400 µs, and decreased for longer gaps. We argue that this result is consistent with a temporal dependency, such as facilitation, operating at the level of the auditory nerve and/or with co-incidence detection by cochlear-nucleus neurons. Experiment 2 first measured the NDR for stimuli at each listener's most comfortable level (\"MCL\") and for F0 = 37, 40, and 43 Hz. This revealed a group delay of about 42 ms, consistent with a thalamic/cortical source. We then showed that the NDR grew steeply with stimulus amplitude and, for most listeners, decreased by more than 12 dB between MCL and 75% of the listener's dynamic range. We argue that the NDR is a potentially useful objective estimate of MCL.</p>","PeriodicalId":56283,"journal":{"name":"Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology","volume":"24 2","pages":"253-264"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10121955/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Interleaved Stimulation and EEG to Measure Temporal Smoothing and Growth of the Sustained Neural Response to Cochlear-Implant Stimulation.\",\"authors\":\"François Guérit,&nbsp;John M Deeks,&nbsp;Dorothée Arzounian,&nbsp;Robin Gransier,&nbsp;Jan Wouters,&nbsp;Robert P Carlyon\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10162-023-00886-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Two EEG experiments measured the sustained neural response to amplitude-modulated (AM) high-rate pulse trains presented to a single cochlear-implant (CI) electrode. Stimuli consisted of two interleaved pulse trains with AM rates F1 and F2 close to 80 and 120 Hz respectively, and where F2 = 1.5F1. Following Carlyon et al. (J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 2021), we assume that such stimuli can produce a neural distortion response (NDR) at F0 = F2-F1 Hz if temporal dependencies (\\\"smoothing\\\") in the auditory system are followed by one or more neural nonlinearities. In experiment 1, the rate of each pulse train was 480 pps and the gap between pulses in the F1 and F2 pulse trains ranged from 0 to 984 µs. The NDR had a roughly constant amplitude for gaps between 0 and about 200-400 µs, and decreased for longer gaps. We argue that this result is consistent with a temporal dependency, such as facilitation, operating at the level of the auditory nerve and/or with co-incidence detection by cochlear-nucleus neurons. Experiment 2 first measured the NDR for stimuli at each listener's most comfortable level (\\\"MCL\\\") and for F0 = 37, 40, and 43 Hz. This revealed a group delay of about 42 ms, consistent with a thalamic/cortical source. We then showed that the NDR grew steeply with stimulus amplitude and, for most listeners, decreased by more than 12 dB between MCL and 75% of the listener's dynamic range. We argue that the NDR is a potentially useful objective estimate of MCL.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology\",\"volume\":\"24 2\",\"pages\":\"253-264\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10121955/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-023-00886-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-023-00886-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

两个脑电图实验测量了一个人工耳蜗(CI)电极对振幅调制(AM)高速率脉冲序列的持续神经反应。刺激包括两个交错脉冲序列,AM率F1和F2分别接近80和120 Hz,其中F2 = 1.5F1。根据Carlyon等人(J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 2021)的研究,我们假设如果听觉系统中的时间依赖性(“平滑”)伴随着一个或多个神经非线性,那么这种刺激可以在F0 = F2-F1 Hz时产生神经失真响应(NDR)。实验1中,每个脉冲序列的速率为480 pps, F1和F2脉冲序列的脉冲间隔为0 ~ 984µs。在0到200-400µs之间的间隙内,NDR的振幅大致恒定,而在更长的间隙内则下降。我们认为,这一结果与时间依赖性相一致,如促进作用,在听神经水平上运作和/或与耳蜗核神经元的共同发病检测相一致。实验2首先测量了每个听者在最舒适水平(“MCL”)和F0 = 37、40和43 Hz时刺激的NDR。结果显示,组延迟约为42毫秒,与丘脑/皮层源一致。然后,我们发现NDR随着刺激幅度的增加而急剧增加,对于大多数听者来说,在MCL和听者动态范围的75%之间,NDR下降超过12 dB。我们认为NDR是MCL的一个潜在有用的客观估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Using Interleaved Stimulation and EEG to Measure Temporal Smoothing and Growth of the Sustained Neural Response to Cochlear-Implant Stimulation.

Using Interleaved Stimulation and EEG to Measure Temporal Smoothing and Growth of the Sustained Neural Response to Cochlear-Implant Stimulation.

Using Interleaved Stimulation and EEG to Measure Temporal Smoothing and Growth of the Sustained Neural Response to Cochlear-Implant Stimulation.

Using Interleaved Stimulation and EEG to Measure Temporal Smoothing and Growth of the Sustained Neural Response to Cochlear-Implant Stimulation.

Two EEG experiments measured the sustained neural response to amplitude-modulated (AM) high-rate pulse trains presented to a single cochlear-implant (CI) electrode. Stimuli consisted of two interleaved pulse trains with AM rates F1 and F2 close to 80 and 120 Hz respectively, and where F2 = 1.5F1. Following Carlyon et al. (J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 2021), we assume that such stimuli can produce a neural distortion response (NDR) at F0 = F2-F1 Hz if temporal dependencies ("smoothing") in the auditory system are followed by one or more neural nonlinearities. In experiment 1, the rate of each pulse train was 480 pps and the gap between pulses in the F1 and F2 pulse trains ranged from 0 to 984 µs. The NDR had a roughly constant amplitude for gaps between 0 and about 200-400 µs, and decreased for longer gaps. We argue that this result is consistent with a temporal dependency, such as facilitation, operating at the level of the auditory nerve and/or with co-incidence detection by cochlear-nucleus neurons. Experiment 2 first measured the NDR for stimuli at each listener's most comfortable level ("MCL") and for F0 = 37, 40, and 43 Hz. This revealed a group delay of about 42 ms, consistent with a thalamic/cortical source. We then showed that the NDR grew steeply with stimulus amplitude and, for most listeners, decreased by more than 12 dB between MCL and 75% of the listener's dynamic range. We argue that the NDR is a potentially useful objective estimate of MCL.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: JARO is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes research findings from disciplines related to otolaryngology and communications sciences, including hearing, balance, speech and voice. JARO welcomes submissions describing experimental research that investigates the mechanisms underlying problems of basic and/or clinical significance. Authors are encouraged to familiarize themselves with the kinds of papers carried by JARO by looking at past issues. Clinical case studies and pharmaceutical screens are not likely to be considered unless they reveal underlying mechanisms. Methods papers are not encouraged unless they include significant new findings as well. Reviews will be published at the discretion of the editorial board; consult the editor-in-chief before submitting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信