一种用于改善社区老年人平衡的立式低频振动锻炼装置:一项单盲随机对照试验。

Physical therapy research Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-07 DOI:10.1298/ptr.E10192
Shinichiro Oka, Yoshio Takano, Hiroo Matsuse, Yoshihiko Tagawa, Naoto Shiba
{"title":"一种用于改善社区老年人平衡的立式低频振动锻炼装置:一项单盲随机对照试验。","authors":"Shinichiro Oka,&nbsp;Yoshio Takano,&nbsp;Hiroo Matsuse,&nbsp;Yoshihiko Tagawa,&nbsp;Naoto Shiba","doi":"10.1298/ptr.E10192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare the effects of the standing low-frequency vibration exercise device (SLVED) and walking training on balance ability on an unstable surface in community-dwelling elderly people.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-eight older adults were randomly allocated to the SLVED sessions: the intervention group (n = 19), and the walking sessions: the control group (n = 19). Each group session lasted 20 min and was performed twice a week for 12 weeks. Standing balance was assessed by the change in center-of-gravity sway of the participant standing on foam rubber with eyes open (EO) and eyes closed (EC). The primary outcome measures were the root mean square (RMS) values of the center of foot pressure in the mediolateral and anteroposterior directions and the RMS area. Secondary outcome measures were the results of the 10-m walking time test (10 MWT), five-times sit-to-stand (5T-STS) test, and timed up-and-go (TUG) test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of variance showed a significant group × time interaction for the TUG test. Significant improvements were observed in Y-RMS for EO condition; RMS, X-RMS, Y-RMS, and RMS area for EC condition; and 10 MWT, 5T-STS test, and TUG test for the main effect of the time factor.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SLVED for intervention in community-dwelling older adults showed a greater improvement than walking training in the TUG test. In addition, SLVED improved the Y-RMS for the EO condition on foam rubber; RMS, X-RMS, Y-RMS, and RMS area for the EC condition on foam rubber in standing balance; and the 10 MWT and 5T-STS test, suggesting that it has similar effects to walking training.</p>","PeriodicalId":74445,"journal":{"name":"Physical therapy research","volume":"26 1","pages":"24-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10169311/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Standing Low-frequency Vibration Exercise Device for Improving Balance in Community-dwelling Older Adults: A Single-blind Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Shinichiro Oka,&nbsp;Yoshio Takano,&nbsp;Hiroo Matsuse,&nbsp;Yoshihiko Tagawa,&nbsp;Naoto Shiba\",\"doi\":\"10.1298/ptr.E10192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare the effects of the standing low-frequency vibration exercise device (SLVED) and walking training on balance ability on an unstable surface in community-dwelling elderly people.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-eight older adults were randomly allocated to the SLVED sessions: the intervention group (n = 19), and the walking sessions: the control group (n = 19). Each group session lasted 20 min and was performed twice a week for 12 weeks. Standing balance was assessed by the change in center-of-gravity sway of the participant standing on foam rubber with eyes open (EO) and eyes closed (EC). The primary outcome measures were the root mean square (RMS) values of the center of foot pressure in the mediolateral and anteroposterior directions and the RMS area. Secondary outcome measures were the results of the 10-m walking time test (10 MWT), five-times sit-to-stand (5T-STS) test, and timed up-and-go (TUG) test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of variance showed a significant group × time interaction for the TUG test. Significant improvements were observed in Y-RMS for EO condition; RMS, X-RMS, Y-RMS, and RMS area for EC condition; and 10 MWT, 5T-STS test, and TUG test for the main effect of the time factor.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SLVED for intervention in community-dwelling older adults showed a greater improvement than walking training in the TUG test. In addition, SLVED improved the Y-RMS for the EO condition on foam rubber; RMS, X-RMS, Y-RMS, and RMS area for the EC condition on foam rubber in standing balance; and the 10 MWT and 5T-STS test, suggesting that it has similar effects to walking training.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74445,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical therapy research\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"24-31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10169311/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical therapy research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1298/ptr.E10192\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/2/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical therapy research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1298/ptr.E10192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在比较站立低频振动锻炼装置(SLVED)和步行训练对社区老年人在不稳定表面上平衡能力的影响。方法:38名老年人被随机分配到SLVED会话:干预组(n=19)和步行会话:对照组(n=19)。每组持续20分钟,每周两次,持续12周。通过参与者睁开眼睛(EO)和闭上眼睛(EC)站在泡沫橡胶上时重心摆动的变化来评估站立平衡。主要的结果测量是足底压力中心在内侧和前后方向上的均方根(RMS)值以及RMS面积。次要结果测量是10米步行时间测试(10 MWT)、5次坐-站(5T-STS)测试和定时出发(TUG)测试的结果。结果:方差分析显示TUG检验存在显著的组×时间交互作用。观察到EO条件下Y-RMS的显著改善;EC条件下的RMS、X-RMS、Y-RMS和RMS区域;以及10MWT、5T-STS试验和TUG试验对时间因素的主要影响。结论:在TUG测试中,SLVED对社区老年人的干预比步行训练有更大的改善。此外,SLVED改善了发泡橡胶EO条件下的Y-RMS;立式天平中泡沫橡胶EC条件下的RMS、X-RMS、Y-RMS和RMS面积;以及10MWT和5T-STS测试,表明其与步行训练具有相似的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Standing Low-frequency Vibration Exercise Device for Improving Balance in Community-dwelling Older Adults: A Single-blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

A Standing Low-frequency Vibration Exercise Device for Improving Balance in Community-dwelling Older Adults: A Single-blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

A Standing Low-frequency Vibration Exercise Device for Improving Balance in Community-dwelling Older Adults: A Single-blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

Objective: This study aimed to compare the effects of the standing low-frequency vibration exercise device (SLVED) and walking training on balance ability on an unstable surface in community-dwelling elderly people.

Methods: Thirty-eight older adults were randomly allocated to the SLVED sessions: the intervention group (n = 19), and the walking sessions: the control group (n = 19). Each group session lasted 20 min and was performed twice a week for 12 weeks. Standing balance was assessed by the change in center-of-gravity sway of the participant standing on foam rubber with eyes open (EO) and eyes closed (EC). The primary outcome measures were the root mean square (RMS) values of the center of foot pressure in the mediolateral and anteroposterior directions and the RMS area. Secondary outcome measures were the results of the 10-m walking time test (10 MWT), five-times sit-to-stand (5T-STS) test, and timed up-and-go (TUG) test.

Results: Analysis of variance showed a significant group × time interaction for the TUG test. Significant improvements were observed in Y-RMS for EO condition; RMS, X-RMS, Y-RMS, and RMS area for EC condition; and 10 MWT, 5T-STS test, and TUG test for the main effect of the time factor.

Conclusion: SLVED for intervention in community-dwelling older adults showed a greater improvement than walking training in the TUG test. In addition, SLVED improved the Y-RMS for the EO condition on foam rubber; RMS, X-RMS, Y-RMS, and RMS area for the EC condition on foam rubber in standing balance; and the 10 MWT and 5T-STS test, suggesting that it has similar effects to walking training.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信