眼科临床常用检查设备对比。

Mark C Schall, Nathan B Fethke, Howard Chen, Anna S Kitzmann
{"title":"眼科临床常用检查设备对比。","authors":"Mark C Schall, Nathan B Fethke, Howard Chen, Anna S Kitzmann","doi":"10.1080/21577323.2014.964812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ophthalmologists report a high prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal symptoms, particularly of the neck and shoulders. Improving the design of equipment used in the clinical environment may reduce exposures to physical risk factors (e.g., sustained muscular exertions and non-neutral postures) associated with neck and shoulder pain among ophthalmologists.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare estimates of neck and shoulder muscle activity and upper arm posture during use of conventional and alternative examination equipment common in clinical ophthalmologic practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifteen ophthalmologists performed one mock clinical examination using conventional equipment and one mock clinical examination using alternative equipment with the potential to reduce exposure to sustained muscular exertions and non-neutral upper arm postures. The alternative equipment included a slit-lamp biomicroscope with inclined viewing oculars, adjustable elbow supports, and a wider table-top with more room for supporting the arms in comparison to the conventional slit-lamp biomicroscope. A wireless binocular indirect ophthalmoscope was also evaluated that had a more even weight distribution than the conventional design. Measurements of upper trapezius and anterior deltoid muscle activity, upper arm posture, and perceived usability were used to compare the conventional and alternative equipment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In comparison to the conventional slit lamp biomicroscope, the alternative slit lamp biomicroscope led to (i) 12% to 13% reductions in upper trapezius muscle activity levels, (ii) a 9% reduction in left anterior deltoid muscle activity levels, and (iii) a 15% reduction in the percentage of work time spent with the left upper arm elevated in positions greater than 60°. In addition, participants rated the comfort and adjustability of both the alternative slit lamp biomicroscope and binocular indirect ophthalmoscope more favorably than the conventional equipment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results suggest that the alternative slit-lamp biomicroscope may help to reduce overall muscular demands and non-neutral postures of the neck and shoulder region among ophthalmologists.</p>","PeriodicalId":73331,"journal":{"name":"IIE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10174276/pdf/nihms-1861477.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of Examination Equipment Used During Common Clinical Ophthalmologic Tasks.\",\"authors\":\"Mark C Schall, Nathan B Fethke, Howard Chen, Anna S Kitzmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21577323.2014.964812\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ophthalmologists report a high prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal symptoms, particularly of the neck and shoulders. Improving the design of equipment used in the clinical environment may reduce exposures to physical risk factors (e.g., sustained muscular exertions and non-neutral postures) associated with neck and shoulder pain among ophthalmologists.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare estimates of neck and shoulder muscle activity and upper arm posture during use of conventional and alternative examination equipment common in clinical ophthalmologic practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifteen ophthalmologists performed one mock clinical examination using conventional equipment and one mock clinical examination using alternative equipment with the potential to reduce exposure to sustained muscular exertions and non-neutral upper arm postures. The alternative equipment included a slit-lamp biomicroscope with inclined viewing oculars, adjustable elbow supports, and a wider table-top with more room for supporting the arms in comparison to the conventional slit-lamp biomicroscope. A wireless binocular indirect ophthalmoscope was also evaluated that had a more even weight distribution than the conventional design. Measurements of upper trapezius and anterior deltoid muscle activity, upper arm posture, and perceived usability were used to compare the conventional and alternative equipment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In comparison to the conventional slit lamp biomicroscope, the alternative slit lamp biomicroscope led to (i) 12% to 13% reductions in upper trapezius muscle activity levels, (ii) a 9% reduction in left anterior deltoid muscle activity levels, and (iii) a 15% reduction in the percentage of work time spent with the left upper arm elevated in positions greater than 60°. In addition, participants rated the comfort and adjustability of both the alternative slit lamp biomicroscope and binocular indirect ophthalmoscope more favorably than the conventional equipment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results suggest that the alternative slit-lamp biomicroscope may help to reduce overall muscular demands and non-neutral postures of the neck and shoulder region among ophthalmologists.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73331,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IIE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10174276/pdf/nihms-1861477.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IIE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21577323.2014.964812\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IIE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21577323.2014.964812","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:眼科医生报告称,与工作有关的肌肉骨骼症状发病率很高,尤其是颈部和肩部。目的:比较在使用眼科临床实践中常见的传统和替代检查设备时颈部和肩部肌肉活动及上臂姿势的估计值:方法: 15 名眼科医生分别使用传统设备和替代设备进行了一次模拟临床检查,前者可减少持续肌肉运动和非中立上臂姿势的暴露。与传统的裂隙灯生物显微镜相比,替代设备包括带有倾斜观察目镜的裂隙灯生物显微镜、可调节的肘部支撑和更宽的桌面,为支撑手臂提供了更多空间。此外,还对一种无线双目间接检眼镜进行了评估,它的重量分布比传统设计更均匀。通过测量斜方肌上部和三角肌前部的肌肉活动、上臂姿势和感知可用性,对传统设备和替代设备进行了比较:结果:与传统裂隙灯生物显微镜相比,替代性裂隙灯生物显微镜(i)使上斜方肌活动水平降低了 12% 至 13%,(ii)使左侧三角肌前部活动水平降低了 9%,(iii)使左上臂抬高超过 60° 的工作时间比例降低了 15%。此外,与传统设备相比,受试者对替代裂隙灯生物显微镜和双目间接检眼镜的舒适性和可调性的评价都更高:结果表明,替代裂隙灯生物显微镜可能有助于减少眼科医生的整体肌肉需求以及颈部和肩部的非中立姿势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Comparison of Examination Equipment Used During Common Clinical Ophthalmologic Tasks.

A Comparison of Examination Equipment Used During Common Clinical Ophthalmologic Tasks.

Background: Ophthalmologists report a high prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal symptoms, particularly of the neck and shoulders. Improving the design of equipment used in the clinical environment may reduce exposures to physical risk factors (e.g., sustained muscular exertions and non-neutral postures) associated with neck and shoulder pain among ophthalmologists.

Purpose: To compare estimates of neck and shoulder muscle activity and upper arm posture during use of conventional and alternative examination equipment common in clinical ophthalmologic practice.

Methods: Fifteen ophthalmologists performed one mock clinical examination using conventional equipment and one mock clinical examination using alternative equipment with the potential to reduce exposure to sustained muscular exertions and non-neutral upper arm postures. The alternative equipment included a slit-lamp biomicroscope with inclined viewing oculars, adjustable elbow supports, and a wider table-top with more room for supporting the arms in comparison to the conventional slit-lamp biomicroscope. A wireless binocular indirect ophthalmoscope was also evaluated that had a more even weight distribution than the conventional design. Measurements of upper trapezius and anterior deltoid muscle activity, upper arm posture, and perceived usability were used to compare the conventional and alternative equipment.

Results: In comparison to the conventional slit lamp biomicroscope, the alternative slit lamp biomicroscope led to (i) 12% to 13% reductions in upper trapezius muscle activity levels, (ii) a 9% reduction in left anterior deltoid muscle activity levels, and (iii) a 15% reduction in the percentage of work time spent with the left upper arm elevated in positions greater than 60°. In addition, participants rated the comfort and adjustability of both the alternative slit lamp biomicroscope and binocular indirect ophthalmoscope more favorably than the conventional equipment.

Conclusions: The results suggest that the alternative slit-lamp biomicroscope may help to reduce overall muscular demands and non-neutral postures of the neck and shoulder region among ophthalmologists.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信