牙龈生物型及其与错牙合的关系。

IF 0.8 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Yousef Al-Thomali, Roshan Noor Mohamed, Sakeenabi Basha, Rekha Setty, Bheema Setty Manasali
{"title":"牙龈生物型及其与错牙合的关系。","authors":"Yousef Al-Thomali,&nbsp;Roshan Noor Mohamed,&nbsp;Sakeenabi Basha,&nbsp;Rekha Setty,&nbsp;Bheema Setty Manasali","doi":"10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2022.2021.0054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically review the relationship between gingival biotype (GT) and malocclusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review followed PRISMA standards of quality for systematic reviews and meta-analyses reporting with PROSPERO registration number CRD42020126543. The systematic database search included MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, PsychINFO, CINAHL, and other key journals; the article search was performed until February 2020. Cochrane's risk of bias in non-randomized studies-of interventions (ROBINS-I) was used to grade the methodological quality of the included studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The systematic search identified 105 studies, six studies satisfied the inclusion criteria for eligibility. The study participants ranged from 26 to 200 (total n=812), with a mean of 135. Study participants were aged between 14 and 32 years. Five studies were graded as the moderate risk of bias and one study as low risk of bias. Two studies showed thin GT among individuals with severe crowding compared to mild crowding. Three studies showed a thin GT with a narrow zone of the keratinized gingival width compared to a thick GT. No relationship was found between GT and Angle's classification of malocclusion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No relationship was observed between Angle's classification of malocclusion and GT. Thin GT was prevalent among individuals with pro-inclination of incisors. Keratinized gingival width was narrow among individuals with thin GT.</p>","PeriodicalId":37013,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Orthodontics","volume":"36 1","pages":"70-77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8d/9d/tjo-36-70.PMC10140659.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gingival Biotype and Its Relation with Malocclusion.\",\"authors\":\"Yousef Al-Thomali,&nbsp;Roshan Noor Mohamed,&nbsp;Sakeenabi Basha,&nbsp;Rekha Setty,&nbsp;Bheema Setty Manasali\",\"doi\":\"10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2022.2021.0054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically review the relationship between gingival biotype (GT) and malocclusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review followed PRISMA standards of quality for systematic reviews and meta-analyses reporting with PROSPERO registration number CRD42020126543. The systematic database search included MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, PsychINFO, CINAHL, and other key journals; the article search was performed until February 2020. Cochrane's risk of bias in non-randomized studies-of interventions (ROBINS-I) was used to grade the methodological quality of the included studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The systematic search identified 105 studies, six studies satisfied the inclusion criteria for eligibility. The study participants ranged from 26 to 200 (total n=812), with a mean of 135. Study participants were aged between 14 and 32 years. Five studies were graded as the moderate risk of bias and one study as low risk of bias. Two studies showed thin GT among individuals with severe crowding compared to mild crowding. Three studies showed a thin GT with a narrow zone of the keratinized gingival width compared to a thick GT. No relationship was found between GT and Angle's classification of malocclusion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No relationship was observed between Angle's classification of malocclusion and GT. Thin GT was prevalent among individuals with pro-inclination of incisors. Keratinized gingival width was narrow among individuals with thin GT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish Journal of Orthodontics\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"70-77\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8d/9d/tjo-36-70.PMC10140659.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish Journal of Orthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2022.2021.0054\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2022.2021.0054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:系统综述牙龈生物型(GT)与错牙合的关系。方法:本综述遵循PRISMA系统评价和荟萃分析质量标准,PROSPERO注册号为CRD42020126543。系统检索数据库包括MEDLINE、Scopus、Embase、PsychINFO、CINAHL等重点期刊;文章检索一直进行到2020年2月。采用Cochrane非随机干预研究的偏倚风险评分(ROBINS-I)对纳入研究的方法学质量进行评分。结果:系统检索到105项研究,6项研究符合纳入标准。研究参与者从26人到200人不等(总n=812),平均135人。研究参与者的年龄在14到32岁之间。5项研究被评为中度偏倚风险,1项研究被评为低偏倚风险。两项研究表明,与轻度拥挤相比,严重拥挤个体的GT较薄。3项研究显示,较薄的GT与较厚的GT相比,其角化牙龈宽度的区域较窄。GT与Angle的错牙合分类没有关系。结论:Angle错颌分型与GT无明显关系,切牙前倾者以薄GT为主。薄GT个体的角化牙龈宽度较窄。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Gingival Biotype and Its Relation with Malocclusion.

Gingival Biotype and Its Relation with Malocclusion.

Gingival Biotype and Its Relation with Malocclusion.

Gingival Biotype and Its Relation with Malocclusion.

Objective: To systematically review the relationship between gingival biotype (GT) and malocclusion.

Methods: The review followed PRISMA standards of quality for systematic reviews and meta-analyses reporting with PROSPERO registration number CRD42020126543. The systematic database search included MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, PsychINFO, CINAHL, and other key journals; the article search was performed until February 2020. Cochrane's risk of bias in non-randomized studies-of interventions (ROBINS-I) was used to grade the methodological quality of the included studies.

Results: The systematic search identified 105 studies, six studies satisfied the inclusion criteria for eligibility. The study participants ranged from 26 to 200 (total n=812), with a mean of 135. Study participants were aged between 14 and 32 years. Five studies were graded as the moderate risk of bias and one study as low risk of bias. Two studies showed thin GT among individuals with severe crowding compared to mild crowding. Three studies showed a thin GT with a narrow zone of the keratinized gingival width compared to a thick GT. No relationship was found between GT and Angle's classification of malocclusion.

Conclusion: No relationship was observed between Angle's classification of malocclusion and GT. Thin GT was prevalent among individuals with pro-inclination of incisors. Keratinized gingival width was narrow among individuals with thin GT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Orthodontics
Turkish Journal of Orthodontics Dentistry-Orthodontics
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信