{"title":"有创血压控制预防急性主动脉夹层急性加重的有效方法探讨。","authors":"Naoya Inoue, Ryo Ohinata, Takashi Mishina, Hiroki Kumihashi, Takehiro Hiramatsu, Takashi Ogane, Yohei Takayama, Shuji Morikawa","doi":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute aortic dissection is associated with high mortality and increased risk of complications. Acute exacerbations have a relatively high frequency; however, the contributing factors are unclear. Blood pressure (BP) and heart rate control are important factors, but the ideal BP control strategy to prevent acute exacerbations under invasive arterial pressure monitoring remains unclear. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to determine the relationship between invasive arterial BP and the effects of acute exacerbation of aortic dissection.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>This single-centre, retrospective, case-control study included 104 patients with a partial diagnosis of acute aortic dissection (Stanford type A or B) who were treated conservatively between September 2013 and September 2022. The patients were divided into exacerbation (acute exacerbation; n = 26) and stable (no acute deterioration) groups. The SBP trend (122.5 ± 13.1 vs. 116.6 ± 10.6 mmHg, respectively; P = 0.024) and mean BP trend (77.8 ± 5.8 vs. 74.4 ± 7.5 mmHg, respectively; P = 0.038) significantly differed between the two groups. The time to target BP was significantly longer in the exacerbation group ( P = 0.036).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The exacerbation group did not achieve a mean SBP < 120 mmHg. Moreover, the importance of early BP reduction was demonstrated in the present study.</p>","PeriodicalId":8950,"journal":{"name":"Blood Pressure Monitoring","volume":"28 3","pages":"123-128"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of effective invasive blood pressure control methods to prevent acute exacerbation of acute aortic dissection.\",\"authors\":\"Naoya Inoue, Ryo Ohinata, Takashi Mishina, Hiroki Kumihashi, Takehiro Hiramatsu, Takashi Ogane, Yohei Takayama, Shuji Morikawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000647\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute aortic dissection is associated with high mortality and increased risk of complications. Acute exacerbations have a relatively high frequency; however, the contributing factors are unclear. Blood pressure (BP) and heart rate control are important factors, but the ideal BP control strategy to prevent acute exacerbations under invasive arterial pressure monitoring remains unclear. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to determine the relationship between invasive arterial BP and the effects of acute exacerbation of aortic dissection.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>This single-centre, retrospective, case-control study included 104 patients with a partial diagnosis of acute aortic dissection (Stanford type A or B) who were treated conservatively between September 2013 and September 2022. The patients were divided into exacerbation (acute exacerbation; n = 26) and stable (no acute deterioration) groups. The SBP trend (122.5 ± 13.1 vs. 116.6 ± 10.6 mmHg, respectively; P = 0.024) and mean BP trend (77.8 ± 5.8 vs. 74.4 ± 7.5 mmHg, respectively; P = 0.038) significantly differed between the two groups. The time to target BP was significantly longer in the exacerbation group ( P = 0.036).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The exacerbation group did not achieve a mean SBP < 120 mmHg. Moreover, the importance of early BP reduction was demonstrated in the present study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood Pressure Monitoring\",\"volume\":\"28 3\",\"pages\":\"123-128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood Pressure Monitoring\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MBP.0000000000000647\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Pressure Monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MBP.0000000000000647","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:急性主动脉夹层与高死亡率和并发症风险增加相关。急性加重的频率相对较高;然而,影响因素尚不清楚。血压(BP)和心率控制是重要的因素,但在有创动脉压监测下,理想的血压控制策略预防急性加重尚不清楚。因此,在本研究中,我们旨在确定有创动脉血压与主动脉夹层急性加重的影响之间的关系。方法和结果:这项单中心、回顾性、病例对照研究纳入了104例部分诊断为急性主动脉夹层(Stanford a型或B型)的患者,这些患者在2013年9月至2022年9月期间接受了保守治疗。将患者分为急性加重期(急性加重期;N = 26)和稳定(无急性恶化)组。收缩压趋势(122.5±13.1 vs 116.6±10.6 mmHg);P = 0.024)和平均血压趋势(77.8±5.8 vs. 74.4±7.5 mmHg);P = 0.038),两组间差异有统计学意义。急性加重组血压达标时间明显延长(P = 0.036)。结论:急性加重组未达到平均收缩压
Investigation of effective invasive blood pressure control methods to prevent acute exacerbation of acute aortic dissection.
Background: Acute aortic dissection is associated with high mortality and increased risk of complications. Acute exacerbations have a relatively high frequency; however, the contributing factors are unclear. Blood pressure (BP) and heart rate control are important factors, but the ideal BP control strategy to prevent acute exacerbations under invasive arterial pressure monitoring remains unclear. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to determine the relationship between invasive arterial BP and the effects of acute exacerbation of aortic dissection.
Methods and results: This single-centre, retrospective, case-control study included 104 patients with a partial diagnosis of acute aortic dissection (Stanford type A or B) who were treated conservatively between September 2013 and September 2022. The patients were divided into exacerbation (acute exacerbation; n = 26) and stable (no acute deterioration) groups. The SBP trend (122.5 ± 13.1 vs. 116.6 ± 10.6 mmHg, respectively; P = 0.024) and mean BP trend (77.8 ± 5.8 vs. 74.4 ± 7.5 mmHg, respectively; P = 0.038) significantly differed between the two groups. The time to target BP was significantly longer in the exacerbation group ( P = 0.036).
Conclusion: The exacerbation group did not achieve a mean SBP < 120 mmHg. Moreover, the importance of early BP reduction was demonstrated in the present study.
期刊介绍:
Blood Pressure Monitoring is devoted to original research in blood pressure measurement and blood pressure variability. It includes device technology, analytical methodology of blood pressure over time and its variability, clinical trials - including, but not limited to, pharmacology - involving blood pressure monitoring, blood pressure reactivity, patient evaluation, and outcomes and effectiveness research.
This innovative journal contains papers dealing with all aspects of manual, automated, and ambulatory monitoring. Basic and clinical science papers are considered although the emphasis is on clinical medicine.
Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.