有创血压控制预防急性主动脉夹层急性加重的有效方法探讨。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Naoya Inoue, Ryo Ohinata, Takashi Mishina, Hiroki Kumihashi, Takehiro Hiramatsu, Takashi Ogane, Yohei Takayama, Shuji Morikawa
{"title":"有创血压控制预防急性主动脉夹层急性加重的有效方法探讨。","authors":"Naoya Inoue,&nbsp;Ryo Ohinata,&nbsp;Takashi Mishina,&nbsp;Hiroki Kumihashi,&nbsp;Takehiro Hiramatsu,&nbsp;Takashi Ogane,&nbsp;Yohei Takayama,&nbsp;Shuji Morikawa","doi":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute aortic dissection is associated with high mortality and increased risk of complications. Acute exacerbations have a relatively high frequency; however, the contributing factors are unclear. Blood pressure (BP) and heart rate control are important factors, but the ideal BP control strategy to prevent acute exacerbations under invasive arterial pressure monitoring remains unclear. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to determine the relationship between invasive arterial BP and the effects of acute exacerbation of aortic dissection.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>This single-centre, retrospective, case-control study included 104 patients with a partial diagnosis of acute aortic dissection (Stanford type A or B) who were treated conservatively between September 2013 and September 2022. The patients were divided into exacerbation (acute exacerbation; n  = 26) and stable (no acute deterioration) groups. The SBP trend (122.5 ± 13.1 vs. 116.6 ± 10.6 mmHg, respectively; P  = 0.024) and mean BP trend (77.8 ± 5.8 vs. 74.4 ± 7.5 mmHg, respectively; P  = 0.038) significantly differed between the two groups. The time to target BP was significantly longer in the exacerbation group ( P  = 0.036).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The exacerbation group did not achieve a mean SBP < 120 mmHg. Moreover, the importance of early BP reduction was demonstrated in the present study.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of effective invasive blood pressure control methods to prevent acute exacerbation of acute aortic dissection.\",\"authors\":\"Naoya Inoue,&nbsp;Ryo Ohinata,&nbsp;Takashi Mishina,&nbsp;Hiroki Kumihashi,&nbsp;Takehiro Hiramatsu,&nbsp;Takashi Ogane,&nbsp;Yohei Takayama,&nbsp;Shuji Morikawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000647\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute aortic dissection is associated with high mortality and increased risk of complications. Acute exacerbations have a relatively high frequency; however, the contributing factors are unclear. Blood pressure (BP) and heart rate control are important factors, but the ideal BP control strategy to prevent acute exacerbations under invasive arterial pressure monitoring remains unclear. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to determine the relationship between invasive arterial BP and the effects of acute exacerbation of aortic dissection.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>This single-centre, retrospective, case-control study included 104 patients with a partial diagnosis of acute aortic dissection (Stanford type A or B) who were treated conservatively between September 2013 and September 2022. The patients were divided into exacerbation (acute exacerbation; n  = 26) and stable (no acute deterioration) groups. The SBP trend (122.5 ± 13.1 vs. 116.6 ± 10.6 mmHg, respectively; P  = 0.024) and mean BP trend (77.8 ± 5.8 vs. 74.4 ± 7.5 mmHg, respectively; P  = 0.038) significantly differed between the two groups. The time to target BP was significantly longer in the exacerbation group ( P  = 0.036).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The exacerbation group did not achieve a mean SBP < 120 mmHg. Moreover, the importance of early BP reduction was demonstrated in the present study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MBP.0000000000000647\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MBP.0000000000000647","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:急性主动脉夹层与高死亡率和并发症风险增加相关。急性加重的频率相对较高;然而,影响因素尚不清楚。血压(BP)和心率控制是重要的因素,但在有创动脉压监测下,理想的血压控制策略预防急性加重尚不清楚。因此,在本研究中,我们旨在确定有创动脉血压与主动脉夹层急性加重的影响之间的关系。方法和结果:这项单中心、回顾性、病例对照研究纳入了104例部分诊断为急性主动脉夹层(Stanford a型或B型)的患者,这些患者在2013年9月至2022年9月期间接受了保守治疗。将患者分为急性加重期(急性加重期;N = 26)和稳定(无急性恶化)组。收缩压趋势(122.5±13.1 vs 116.6±10.6 mmHg);P = 0.024)和平均血压趋势(77.8±5.8 vs. 74.4±7.5 mmHg);P = 0.038),两组间差异有统计学意义。急性加重组血压达标时间明显延长(P = 0.036)。结论:急性加重组未达到平均收缩压
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigation of effective invasive blood pressure control methods to prevent acute exacerbation of acute aortic dissection.

Background: Acute aortic dissection is associated with high mortality and increased risk of complications. Acute exacerbations have a relatively high frequency; however, the contributing factors are unclear. Blood pressure (BP) and heart rate control are important factors, but the ideal BP control strategy to prevent acute exacerbations under invasive arterial pressure monitoring remains unclear. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to determine the relationship between invasive arterial BP and the effects of acute exacerbation of aortic dissection.

Methods and results: This single-centre, retrospective, case-control study included 104 patients with a partial diagnosis of acute aortic dissection (Stanford type A or B) who were treated conservatively between September 2013 and September 2022. The patients were divided into exacerbation (acute exacerbation; n  = 26) and stable (no acute deterioration) groups. The SBP trend (122.5 ± 13.1 vs. 116.6 ± 10.6 mmHg, respectively; P  = 0.024) and mean BP trend (77.8 ± 5.8 vs. 74.4 ± 7.5 mmHg, respectively; P  = 0.038) significantly differed between the two groups. The time to target BP was significantly longer in the exacerbation group ( P  = 0.036).

Conclusion: The exacerbation group did not achieve a mean SBP < 120 mmHg. Moreover, the importance of early BP reduction was demonstrated in the present study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信