Bernhard Roth, Tomas Lucca Bothe, Andreas Patzak, Niklas Pilz
{"title":"根据AAMI/ESH/ISO通用标准(ISO 81060-2:2018)在普通人群中验证ABPMpro动态血压监测仪。","authors":"Bernhard Roth, Tomas Lucca Bothe, Andreas Patzak, Niklas Pilz","doi":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of the oscillometric upper-arm device ABPMpro (SOMNOmedics) for ambulatory blood pressure measurement in the general population according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization (AAMI/ESH/ISO) Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2:2018) at rest and during dynamic exercise.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Subjects were recruited to fulfill the age, sex, blood pressure (BP) and cuff distribution criteria of the AAMI/ESH/ISO standard using the same arm sequential BP measurement method. Three appropriate cuff sizes (18-24, 24-34 and 34-46 cm) of the tested device were used for the arm-varying circumferences. The inflation and deflation measurement modes of the ABPMpro were investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the general validation study, 100 subjects were recruited and 90 were analyzed. For validation criterion (1), the mean ± SD of the differences between ABPMpro and reference BP was 0.7 ± 7.3/-0.7 ± 5.8 mmHg (systolic/diastolic) for inflation and 1.4 ± 7.7/-0.6 ± 6.1 mmHg for deflation measurements. For criterion (2), the SD of the averaged BP differences per subject was 5.98/5.10 mmHg for inflation and 6.46/5.36 mmHg for deflation measurements, thereby passing the threshold. In the ambulatory validation study ( N = 36), the mean difference was -1.2 ± 7.9/ 2.4 ± 6.6 mmHg for inflation and -0.7 ± 7.6/3.1 ± 7.0 mmHg for deflation measurements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ABPMpro device fulfilled the ISO 81060-2:2018 requirements in the general population and in the ambulatory setting and can therefore be recommended for clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":8950,"journal":{"name":"Blood Pressure Monitoring","volume":"28 3","pages":"158-162"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10132455/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the ABPMpro ambulatory blood pressure monitor in the general population according to AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2:2018).\",\"authors\":\"Bernhard Roth, Tomas Lucca Bothe, Andreas Patzak, Niklas Pilz\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000640\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of the oscillometric upper-arm device ABPMpro (SOMNOmedics) for ambulatory blood pressure measurement in the general population according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization (AAMI/ESH/ISO) Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2:2018) at rest and during dynamic exercise.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Subjects were recruited to fulfill the age, sex, blood pressure (BP) and cuff distribution criteria of the AAMI/ESH/ISO standard using the same arm sequential BP measurement method. Three appropriate cuff sizes (18-24, 24-34 and 34-46 cm) of the tested device were used for the arm-varying circumferences. The inflation and deflation measurement modes of the ABPMpro were investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the general validation study, 100 subjects were recruited and 90 were analyzed. For validation criterion (1), the mean ± SD of the differences between ABPMpro and reference BP was 0.7 ± 7.3/-0.7 ± 5.8 mmHg (systolic/diastolic) for inflation and 1.4 ± 7.7/-0.6 ± 6.1 mmHg for deflation measurements. For criterion (2), the SD of the averaged BP differences per subject was 5.98/5.10 mmHg for inflation and 6.46/5.36 mmHg for deflation measurements, thereby passing the threshold. In the ambulatory validation study ( N = 36), the mean difference was -1.2 ± 7.9/ 2.4 ± 6.6 mmHg for inflation and -0.7 ± 7.6/3.1 ± 7.0 mmHg for deflation measurements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ABPMpro device fulfilled the ISO 81060-2:2018 requirements in the general population and in the ambulatory setting and can therefore be recommended for clinical use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood Pressure Monitoring\",\"volume\":\"28 3\",\"pages\":\"158-162\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10132455/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood Pressure Monitoring\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MBP.0000000000000640\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Pressure Monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MBP.0000000000000640","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validation of the ABPMpro ambulatory blood pressure monitor in the general population according to AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2:2018).
Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of the oscillometric upper-arm device ABPMpro (SOMNOmedics) for ambulatory blood pressure measurement in the general population according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization (AAMI/ESH/ISO) Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2:2018) at rest and during dynamic exercise.
Methods: Subjects were recruited to fulfill the age, sex, blood pressure (BP) and cuff distribution criteria of the AAMI/ESH/ISO standard using the same arm sequential BP measurement method. Three appropriate cuff sizes (18-24, 24-34 and 34-46 cm) of the tested device were used for the arm-varying circumferences. The inflation and deflation measurement modes of the ABPMpro were investigated.
Results: For the general validation study, 100 subjects were recruited and 90 were analyzed. For validation criterion (1), the mean ± SD of the differences between ABPMpro and reference BP was 0.7 ± 7.3/-0.7 ± 5.8 mmHg (systolic/diastolic) for inflation and 1.4 ± 7.7/-0.6 ± 6.1 mmHg for deflation measurements. For criterion (2), the SD of the averaged BP differences per subject was 5.98/5.10 mmHg for inflation and 6.46/5.36 mmHg for deflation measurements, thereby passing the threshold. In the ambulatory validation study ( N = 36), the mean difference was -1.2 ± 7.9/ 2.4 ± 6.6 mmHg for inflation and -0.7 ± 7.6/3.1 ± 7.0 mmHg for deflation measurements.
Conclusion: The ABPMpro device fulfilled the ISO 81060-2:2018 requirements in the general population and in the ambulatory setting and can therefore be recommended for clinical use.
期刊介绍:
Blood Pressure Monitoring is devoted to original research in blood pressure measurement and blood pressure variability. It includes device technology, analytical methodology of blood pressure over time and its variability, clinical trials - including, but not limited to, pharmacology - involving blood pressure monitoring, blood pressure reactivity, patient evaluation, and outcomes and effectiveness research.
This innovative journal contains papers dealing with all aspects of manual, automated, and ambulatory monitoring. Basic and clinical science papers are considered although the emphasis is on clinical medicine.
Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.