{"title":"银屑病关节炎患者对生物和传统DMARDs的耐受性如何:一项真实世界的研究。","authors":"Issrah I Jawad, Muhammed K Nisar","doi":"10.5152/eurjrheum.2021.21027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Even though disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are well established in rou- tine clinical practice, longitudinal real-world data for their retention and tolerability are sparse, espe- cially in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients. Our objective was to describe the characteristics of our large PsA cohort including the comorbidities and evaluate real-world DMARD tolerability and discontinua- tion rates with reasons for stopping treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively interrogated the electronic, multipurpose, live setting database at our uni- versity hospital to identify 335 patients diagnosed with PsA who had received conventional DMARDs (cDMARDs) and/or biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) between 1994 up to and including April 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 170 (50.7%) patients had discontinued one or more cDMARDs prior with a mean dura- tion before discontinuation of 9.9 months. In contrast, only 28 (24.8%) patients had stopped a course of bDMARDs at some point. The mean duration before biologic therapy was discontinued was 18.2 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To our knowledge, this is the first dedicated retrospective review of a large real-world PsA cohort addressing drug survival and tolerability of DMARDs over a 20-year period. Our study shows that in reality, cDMARDs are not well tolerated. This should encourage review of international guid- ance allowing earlier employment of biologics in the treatment paradigm.</p>","PeriodicalId":12066,"journal":{"name":"European journal of rheumatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c0/d7/ejr-9-2-100.PMC10176215.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How well are biologic and conventional DMARDs tolerated in psoriatic arthritis: A real world study.\",\"authors\":\"Issrah I Jawad, Muhammed K Nisar\",\"doi\":\"10.5152/eurjrheum.2021.21027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Even though disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are well established in rou- tine clinical practice, longitudinal real-world data for their retention and tolerability are sparse, espe- cially in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients. Our objective was to describe the characteristics of our large PsA cohort including the comorbidities and evaluate real-world DMARD tolerability and discontinua- tion rates with reasons for stopping treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively interrogated the electronic, multipurpose, live setting database at our uni- versity hospital to identify 335 patients diagnosed with PsA who had received conventional DMARDs (cDMARDs) and/or biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) between 1994 up to and including April 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 170 (50.7%) patients had discontinued one or more cDMARDs prior with a mean dura- tion before discontinuation of 9.9 months. In contrast, only 28 (24.8%) patients had stopped a course of bDMARDs at some point. The mean duration before biologic therapy was discontinued was 18.2 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To our knowledge, this is the first dedicated retrospective review of a large real-world PsA cohort addressing drug survival and tolerability of DMARDs over a 20-year period. Our study shows that in reality, cDMARDs are not well tolerated. This should encourage review of international guid- ance allowing earlier employment of biologics in the treatment paradigm.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of rheumatology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c0/d7/ejr-9-2-100.PMC10176215.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5152/eurjrheum.2021.21027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/eurjrheum.2021.21027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
How well are biologic and conventional DMARDs tolerated in psoriatic arthritis: A real world study.
Objective: Even though disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are well established in rou- tine clinical practice, longitudinal real-world data for their retention and tolerability are sparse, espe- cially in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients. Our objective was to describe the characteristics of our large PsA cohort including the comorbidities and evaluate real-world DMARD tolerability and discontinua- tion rates with reasons for stopping treatment.
Methods: We retrospectively interrogated the electronic, multipurpose, live setting database at our uni- versity hospital to identify 335 patients diagnosed with PsA who had received conventional DMARDs (cDMARDs) and/or biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) between 1994 up to and including April 2019.
Results: In total, 170 (50.7%) patients had discontinued one or more cDMARDs prior with a mean dura- tion before discontinuation of 9.9 months. In contrast, only 28 (24.8%) patients had stopped a course of bDMARDs at some point. The mean duration before biologic therapy was discontinued was 18.2 months.
Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first dedicated retrospective review of a large real-world PsA cohort addressing drug survival and tolerability of DMARDs over a 20-year period. Our study shows that in reality, cDMARDs are not well tolerated. This should encourage review of international guid- ance allowing earlier employment of biologics in the treatment paradigm.