Silvina Bergese , Bárbara Fox , Natalia García-Allende , María Elisa Elisiri , Ana Elizabeth Schneider , Juan Ruiz , Sol Gonzalez-Fraga , Viviana Rodriguez , Liliana Fernandez-Canigia
{"title":"多重分子 FilmArray Respiratory Panel 对抗生素处方和疑似急性呼吸道感染的免疫受损成人临床管理的影响:前后回顾性研究","authors":"Silvina Bergese , Bárbara Fox , Natalia García-Allende , María Elisa Elisiri , Ana Elizabeth Schneider , Juan Ruiz , Sol Gonzalez-Fraga , Viviana Rodriguez , Liliana Fernandez-Canigia","doi":"10.1016/j.ram.2023.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study aimed to assess the impact of the implementation of a rapid multiplex molecular FilmArray Respiratory Panel (FRP) on the medical management of immunocompromised patients from a community general hospital. We conducted a single-center, retrospective, and before–after study. Two periods were evaluated: before the implementation of the FRP (pre-FRP) from April 2017 to May 2018 and after the implementation of the FRP (post-FRP) from January to July 2019. The inclusion criteria were immunocompromised patients over 18 years of age with suspected acute respiratory illness tested by conventional diagnostic methods (pre-FRP) or the FilmArray™ Respiratory Panel v1.7 (post-FRP). A total of 142 patients were included, 64 patients in the pre-FRP and 78 patients in the post-FRP. The positive detection rate was significantly higher in the post-FRP (63% vs. 10%, <em>p</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.01). There were more patients receiving antimicrobial treatment in the pre-FRP compared with the post-FRP period (94% vs. 68%, <em>p</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.01). A decrease in beta-lactam (89% vs. 61%, <em>p</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.01) and macrolide (44% vs. 13%, <em>p</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.01) prescriptions were observed in the post-FRP. No differences were observed in oseltamivir use (22% vs. 13%, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.14), changes in antimicrobial treatment, hospital admission rate, days-reduction in droplet isolation precautions, hospital length of stay (LOS), admission to intensive care unit (ICU), LOS in ICU, treatment failure and 30-day mortality. The implementation of the FRP impacted patient care by improving diagnostic yield and optimizing antimicrobial treatment in immunocompromised adult patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21163,"journal":{"name":"Revista Argentina de microbiologia","volume":"55 4","pages":"Pages 337-344"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0325754123000263/pdfft?md5=d7ff7630047efdf055c829184e1a1aab&pid=1-s2.0-S0325754123000263-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of the multiplex molecular FilmArray Respiratory Panel on antibiotic prescription and clinical management of immunocompromised adults with suspected acute respiratory tract infections: A retrospective before–after study\",\"authors\":\"Silvina Bergese , Bárbara Fox , Natalia García-Allende , María Elisa Elisiri , Ana Elizabeth Schneider , Juan Ruiz , Sol Gonzalez-Fraga , Viviana Rodriguez , Liliana Fernandez-Canigia\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ram.2023.03.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study aimed to assess the impact of the implementation of a rapid multiplex molecular FilmArray Respiratory Panel (FRP) on the medical management of immunocompromised patients from a community general hospital. We conducted a single-center, retrospective, and before–after study. Two periods were evaluated: before the implementation of the FRP (pre-FRP) from April 2017 to May 2018 and after the implementation of the FRP (post-FRP) from January to July 2019. The inclusion criteria were immunocompromised patients over 18 years of age with suspected acute respiratory illness tested by conventional diagnostic methods (pre-FRP) or the FilmArray™ Respiratory Panel v1.7 (post-FRP). A total of 142 patients were included, 64 patients in the pre-FRP and 78 patients in the post-FRP. The positive detection rate was significantly higher in the post-FRP (63% vs. 10%, <em>p</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.01). There were more patients receiving antimicrobial treatment in the pre-FRP compared with the post-FRP period (94% vs. 68%, <em>p</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.01). A decrease in beta-lactam (89% vs. 61%, <em>p</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.01) and macrolide (44% vs. 13%, <em>p</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.01) prescriptions were observed in the post-FRP. No differences were observed in oseltamivir use (22% vs. 13%, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.14), changes in antimicrobial treatment, hospital admission rate, days-reduction in droplet isolation precautions, hospital length of stay (LOS), admission to intensive care unit (ICU), LOS in ICU, treatment failure and 30-day mortality. The implementation of the FRP impacted patient care by improving diagnostic yield and optimizing antimicrobial treatment in immunocompromised adult patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Argentina de microbiologia\",\"volume\":\"55 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 337-344\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0325754123000263/pdfft?md5=d7ff7630047efdf055c829184e1a1aab&pid=1-s2.0-S0325754123000263-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Argentina de microbiologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0325754123000263\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Argentina de microbiologia","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0325754123000263","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of the multiplex molecular FilmArray Respiratory Panel on antibiotic prescription and clinical management of immunocompromised adults with suspected acute respiratory tract infections: A retrospective before–after study
This study aimed to assess the impact of the implementation of a rapid multiplex molecular FilmArray Respiratory Panel (FRP) on the medical management of immunocompromised patients from a community general hospital. We conducted a single-center, retrospective, and before–after study. Two periods were evaluated: before the implementation of the FRP (pre-FRP) from April 2017 to May 2018 and after the implementation of the FRP (post-FRP) from January to July 2019. The inclusion criteria were immunocompromised patients over 18 years of age with suspected acute respiratory illness tested by conventional diagnostic methods (pre-FRP) or the FilmArray™ Respiratory Panel v1.7 (post-FRP). A total of 142 patients were included, 64 patients in the pre-FRP and 78 patients in the post-FRP. The positive detection rate was significantly higher in the post-FRP (63% vs. 10%, p < 0.01). There were more patients receiving antimicrobial treatment in the pre-FRP compared with the post-FRP period (94% vs. 68%, p < 0.01). A decrease in beta-lactam (89% vs. 61%, p < 0.01) and macrolide (44% vs. 13%, p < 0.01) prescriptions were observed in the post-FRP. No differences were observed in oseltamivir use (22% vs. 13%, p = 0.14), changes in antimicrobial treatment, hospital admission rate, days-reduction in droplet isolation precautions, hospital length of stay (LOS), admission to intensive care unit (ICU), LOS in ICU, treatment failure and 30-day mortality. The implementation of the FRP impacted patient care by improving diagnostic yield and optimizing antimicrobial treatment in immunocompromised adult patients.
期刊介绍:
La Revista Argentina de Microbiología es una publicación trimestral editada por la Asociación Argentina de Microbiología y destinada a la difusión de trabajos científicos en las distintas áreas de la Microbiología. La Asociación Argentina de Microbiología se reserva los derechos de propiedad y reproducción del material aceptado y publicado.