多重分子 FilmArray Respiratory Panel 对抗生素处方和疑似急性呼吸道感染的免疫受损成人临床管理的影响:前后回顾性研究

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Silvina Bergese , Bárbara Fox , Natalia García-Allende , María Elisa Elisiri , Ana Elizabeth Schneider , Juan Ruiz , Sol Gonzalez-Fraga , Viviana Rodriguez , Liliana Fernandez-Canigia
{"title":"多重分子 FilmArray Respiratory Panel 对抗生素处方和疑似急性呼吸道感染的免疫受损成人临床管理的影响:前后回顾性研究","authors":"Silvina Bergese ,&nbsp;Bárbara Fox ,&nbsp;Natalia García-Allende ,&nbsp;María Elisa Elisiri ,&nbsp;Ana Elizabeth Schneider ,&nbsp;Juan Ruiz ,&nbsp;Sol Gonzalez-Fraga ,&nbsp;Viviana Rodriguez ,&nbsp;Liliana Fernandez-Canigia","doi":"10.1016/j.ram.2023.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study aimed to assess the impact of the implementation of a rapid multiplex molecular FilmArray Respiratory Panel (FRP) on the medical management of immunocompromised patients from a community general hospital. We conducted a single-center, retrospective, and before–after study. Two periods were evaluated: before the implementation of the FRP (pre-FRP) from April 2017 to May 2018 and after the implementation of the FRP (post-FRP) from January to July 2019. The inclusion criteria were immunocompromised patients over 18 years of age with suspected acute respiratory illness tested by conventional diagnostic methods (pre-FRP) or the FilmArray™ Respiratory Panel v1.7 (post-FRP). A total of 142 patients were included, 64 patients in the pre-FRP and 78 patients in the post-FRP. The positive detection rate was significantly higher in the post-FRP (63% vs. 10%, <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.01). There were more patients receiving antimicrobial treatment in the pre-FRP compared with the post-FRP period (94% vs. 68%, <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.01). A decrease in beta-lactam (89% vs. 61%, <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.01) and macrolide (44% vs. 13%, <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.01) prescriptions were observed in the post-FRP. No differences were observed in oseltamivir use (22% vs. 13%, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.14), changes in antimicrobial treatment, hospital admission rate, days-reduction in droplet isolation precautions, hospital length of stay (LOS), admission to intensive care unit (ICU), LOS in ICU, treatment failure and 30-day mortality. The implementation of the FRP impacted patient care by improving diagnostic yield and optimizing antimicrobial treatment in immunocompromised adult patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0325754123000263/pdfft?md5=d7ff7630047efdf055c829184e1a1aab&pid=1-s2.0-S0325754123000263-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of the multiplex molecular FilmArray Respiratory Panel on antibiotic prescription and clinical management of immunocompromised adults with suspected acute respiratory tract infections: A retrospective before–after study\",\"authors\":\"Silvina Bergese ,&nbsp;Bárbara Fox ,&nbsp;Natalia García-Allende ,&nbsp;María Elisa Elisiri ,&nbsp;Ana Elizabeth Schneider ,&nbsp;Juan Ruiz ,&nbsp;Sol Gonzalez-Fraga ,&nbsp;Viviana Rodriguez ,&nbsp;Liliana Fernandez-Canigia\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ram.2023.03.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study aimed to assess the impact of the implementation of a rapid multiplex molecular FilmArray Respiratory Panel (FRP) on the medical management of immunocompromised patients from a community general hospital. We conducted a single-center, retrospective, and before–after study. Two periods were evaluated: before the implementation of the FRP (pre-FRP) from April 2017 to May 2018 and after the implementation of the FRP (post-FRP) from January to July 2019. The inclusion criteria were immunocompromised patients over 18 years of age with suspected acute respiratory illness tested by conventional diagnostic methods (pre-FRP) or the FilmArray™ Respiratory Panel v1.7 (post-FRP). A total of 142 patients were included, 64 patients in the pre-FRP and 78 patients in the post-FRP. The positive detection rate was significantly higher in the post-FRP (63% vs. 10%, <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.01). There were more patients receiving antimicrobial treatment in the pre-FRP compared with the post-FRP period (94% vs. 68%, <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.01). A decrease in beta-lactam (89% vs. 61%, <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.01) and macrolide (44% vs. 13%, <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.01) prescriptions were observed in the post-FRP. No differences were observed in oseltamivir use (22% vs. 13%, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.14), changes in antimicrobial treatment, hospital admission rate, days-reduction in droplet isolation precautions, hospital length of stay (LOS), admission to intensive care unit (ICU), LOS in ICU, treatment failure and 30-day mortality. The implementation of the FRP impacted patient care by improving diagnostic yield and optimizing antimicrobial treatment in immunocompromised adult patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0325754123000263/pdfft?md5=d7ff7630047efdf055c829184e1a1aab&pid=1-s2.0-S0325754123000263-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0325754123000263\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0325754123000263","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估快速多重分子FilmArray Respiratory Panel(FRP)的实施对社区综合医院免疫力低下患者医疗管理的影响。我们进行了一项单中心、回顾性、前后对比研究。评估分为两个阶段:2017 年 4 月至 2018 年 5 月 FRP 实施前(pre-FRP)和 2019 年 1 月至 7 月 FRP 实施后(post-FRP)。纳入标准为通过传统诊断方法(FRP前)或FilmArray™ Respiratory Panel v1.7(FRP后)检测的18岁以上疑似急性呼吸道疾病的免疫功能低下患者。共纳入了 142 名患者,其中 64 名患者接受了前 FRP 检测,78 名患者接受了后 FRP 检测。FRP 后的阳性检出率明显更高(63% 对 10%,p < 0.01)。与 FRP 后相比,FRP 前接受抗菌治疗的患者更多(94% 对 68%,p < 0.01)。在基金实施后,β-内酰胺类药物(89% 对 61%,p < 0.01)和大环内酯类药物(44% 对 13%,p < 0.01)的处方量有所减少。在奥司他韦的使用(22% vs. 13%,p = 0.14)、抗菌药物治疗的变化、入院率、飞沫隔离预防措施天数减少、住院时间(LOS)、重症监护室(ICU)入院时间、重症监护室住院时间、治疗失败和 30 天死亡率方面未观察到差异。FRP 的实施提高了免疫力低下的成人患者的诊断率并优化了抗菌治疗,从而对患者护理产生了影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of the multiplex molecular FilmArray Respiratory Panel on antibiotic prescription and clinical management of immunocompromised adults with suspected acute respiratory tract infections: A retrospective before–after study

This study aimed to assess the impact of the implementation of a rapid multiplex molecular FilmArray Respiratory Panel (FRP) on the medical management of immunocompromised patients from a community general hospital. We conducted a single-center, retrospective, and before–after study. Two periods were evaluated: before the implementation of the FRP (pre-FRP) from April 2017 to May 2018 and after the implementation of the FRP (post-FRP) from January to July 2019. The inclusion criteria were immunocompromised patients over 18 years of age with suspected acute respiratory illness tested by conventional diagnostic methods (pre-FRP) or the FilmArray™ Respiratory Panel v1.7 (post-FRP). A total of 142 patients were included, 64 patients in the pre-FRP and 78 patients in the post-FRP. The positive detection rate was significantly higher in the post-FRP (63% vs. 10%, p < 0.01). There were more patients receiving antimicrobial treatment in the pre-FRP compared with the post-FRP period (94% vs. 68%, p < 0.01). A decrease in beta-lactam (89% vs. 61%, p < 0.01) and macrolide (44% vs. 13%, p < 0.01) prescriptions were observed in the post-FRP. No differences were observed in oseltamivir use (22% vs. 13%, p = 0.14), changes in antimicrobial treatment, hospital admission rate, days-reduction in droplet isolation precautions, hospital length of stay (LOS), admission to intensive care unit (ICU), LOS in ICU, treatment failure and 30-day mortality. The implementation of the FRP impacted patient care by improving diagnostic yield and optimizing antimicrobial treatment in immunocompromised adult patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信