义齿清洗剂对附着体种植覆盖义齿固位损失的影响。

IF 3 Q3 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Hamad S AlRumaih, Alhanouf A Albarrak, Muneera AlMedaires, Ahmed A Alsulaiman, Nadim Z Baba, Faris A Alshahrani, Firas K Alqarawi, Yousif A Al-Dulaijan, Fawaz Alzoubi, Abdulkareem A Alhumaidan, Mohammed M Gad
{"title":"义齿清洗剂对附着体种植覆盖义齿固位损失的影响。","authors":"Hamad S AlRumaih,&nbsp;Alhanouf A Albarrak,&nbsp;Muneera AlMedaires,&nbsp;Ahmed A Alsulaiman,&nbsp;Nadim Z Baba,&nbsp;Faris A Alshahrani,&nbsp;Firas K Alqarawi,&nbsp;Yousif A Al-Dulaijan,&nbsp;Fawaz Alzoubi,&nbsp;Abdulkareem A Alhumaidan,&nbsp;Mohammed M Gad","doi":"10.1155/2023/5077785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effects of different denture cleansing solutions (DCSs) on the retention of Locator and Locator R-Tx attachment systems of implant retained overdentures (IRO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two part acrylic resin blocks were fabricated, upper part contained metal housing and plastic inserts and lower part contained implant analogs and abutments. Eighty pink plastic inserts (40/attachment, 10/solution) were immersed in Corega, Fittydent, sodium hypochlorite, and water for a time simulating upto 1-year of clinical usage. Acrylic blocks were held on a universal testing machine for a pull-out test to record the dislodgement force. Measurements were conducted after 6 months (T1) and 12 months (T2). One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's HSD test was used to analyze the results (<i>α</i> = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For both attachments, retention significantly decreased after immersion in different solutions at T2 (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Locator R-Tx attachment in NaOCl showed a significant decrease in retention compared with other solutions at T1. At T2, there was a significant decrease in retention for all DCS compared with water (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Locator R-TX showed higher retention values per solution compared to Locator attachment (<i>P</i> < 0.001). In terms of retention loss %, NaOCl recorded the highest (61.87%) loss, followed by Corega (55.54%) and Fittydent (43.13%), whereas water demonstrated the best retention (16.13%) in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Locator R-TX has better retention with different DCS immersion. The loss of retention varied with different types of DCS and NaOCl recorded the highest retention loss. Therefore, denture cleanser selection must be guided by the type of IRO attachment.</p>","PeriodicalId":13704,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Biomaterials","volume":"2023 ","pages":"5077785"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10163970/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of Denture Cleansers on the Retention Loss of Attachment Systems Retained Implant Overdenture.\",\"authors\":\"Hamad S AlRumaih,&nbsp;Alhanouf A Albarrak,&nbsp;Muneera AlMedaires,&nbsp;Ahmed A Alsulaiman,&nbsp;Nadim Z Baba,&nbsp;Faris A Alshahrani,&nbsp;Firas K Alqarawi,&nbsp;Yousif A Al-Dulaijan,&nbsp;Fawaz Alzoubi,&nbsp;Abdulkareem A Alhumaidan,&nbsp;Mohammed M Gad\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2023/5077785\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effects of different denture cleansing solutions (DCSs) on the retention of Locator and Locator R-Tx attachment systems of implant retained overdentures (IRO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two part acrylic resin blocks were fabricated, upper part contained metal housing and plastic inserts and lower part contained implant analogs and abutments. Eighty pink plastic inserts (40/attachment, 10/solution) were immersed in Corega, Fittydent, sodium hypochlorite, and water for a time simulating upto 1-year of clinical usage. Acrylic blocks were held on a universal testing machine for a pull-out test to record the dislodgement force. Measurements were conducted after 6 months (T1) and 12 months (T2). One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's HSD test was used to analyze the results (<i>α</i> = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For both attachments, retention significantly decreased after immersion in different solutions at T2 (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Locator R-Tx attachment in NaOCl showed a significant decrease in retention compared with other solutions at T1. At T2, there was a significant decrease in retention for all DCS compared with water (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Locator R-TX showed higher retention values per solution compared to Locator attachment (<i>P</i> < 0.001). In terms of retention loss %, NaOCl recorded the highest (61.87%) loss, followed by Corega (55.54%) and Fittydent (43.13%), whereas water demonstrated the best retention (16.13%) in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Locator R-TX has better retention with different DCS immersion. The loss of retention varied with different types of DCS and NaOCl recorded the highest retention loss. Therefore, denture cleanser selection must be guided by the type of IRO attachment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Biomaterials\",\"volume\":\"2023 \",\"pages\":\"5077785\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10163970/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Biomaterials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/5077785\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Biomaterials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/5077785","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在评估不同义齿清洁液(dcs)对种植固位覆盖义齿Locator和Locator R-Tx附着体固位的影响。方法:制作两部分丙烯酸树脂块,上半部分包含金属外壳和塑料插入物,下半部分包含种植物类似物和基台。80个粉色塑料植入物(40个/附件,10个/溶液)浸泡在Corega、Fittydent、次氯酸钠和水中,模拟临床使用长达1年的时间。将丙烯酸块放在万能试验机上进行拉出试验,记录位移力。6个月(T1)和12个月(T2)后进行测量。采用单因素方差分析和Tukey’s HSD检验对结果进行分析(α = 0.05)。结果:两种附着体在T2浸泡不同溶液后,固位显著降低(P < 0.001)。与其他溶液相比,NaOCl中定位器R-Tx附着在T1时的保留率显著降低。T2时,与水相比,所有DCS的潴留显著减少(P < 0.001)。与Locator附件相比,Locator R-TX在每个溶液中显示更高的保留值(P < 0.001)。水分流失率以NaOCl最高(61.87%),Corega次之(55.54%),Fittydent次之(43.13%),水的水分流失率最高(16.13%)。结论:定位器R-TX在不同DCS浸液下具有较好的固位效果。不同类型DCS的固位损失不同,以NaOCl固位损失最高。因此,义齿清洗剂的选择必须以IRO附着体的类型为指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Influence of Denture Cleansers on the Retention Loss of Attachment Systems Retained Implant Overdenture.

Influence of Denture Cleansers on the Retention Loss of Attachment Systems Retained Implant Overdenture.

Influence of Denture Cleansers on the Retention Loss of Attachment Systems Retained Implant Overdenture.

Influence of Denture Cleansers on the Retention Loss of Attachment Systems Retained Implant Overdenture.

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of different denture cleansing solutions (DCSs) on the retention of Locator and Locator R-Tx attachment systems of implant retained overdentures (IRO).

Methods: Two part acrylic resin blocks were fabricated, upper part contained metal housing and plastic inserts and lower part contained implant analogs and abutments. Eighty pink plastic inserts (40/attachment, 10/solution) were immersed in Corega, Fittydent, sodium hypochlorite, and water for a time simulating upto 1-year of clinical usage. Acrylic blocks were held on a universal testing machine for a pull-out test to record the dislodgement force. Measurements were conducted after 6 months (T1) and 12 months (T2). One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's HSD test was used to analyze the results (α = 0.05).

Results: For both attachments, retention significantly decreased after immersion in different solutions at T2 (P < 0.001). Locator R-Tx attachment in NaOCl showed a significant decrease in retention compared with other solutions at T1. At T2, there was a significant decrease in retention for all DCS compared with water (P < 0.001). Locator R-TX showed higher retention values per solution compared to Locator attachment (P < 0.001). In terms of retention loss %, NaOCl recorded the highest (61.87%) loss, followed by Corega (55.54%) and Fittydent (43.13%), whereas water demonstrated the best retention (16.13%) in both groups.

Conclusion: Locator R-TX has better retention with different DCS immersion. The loss of retention varied with different types of DCS and NaOCl recorded the highest retention loss. Therefore, denture cleanser selection must be guided by the type of IRO attachment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Biomaterials
International Journal of Biomaterials MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
50
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信