Li Huan Angela Marie Chan, Khai Pang Leong, Justina Wei Lynn Tan, Xiao Gao, Wei Qiang See, Ee Tzun Koh
{"title":"双类风湿因子和抗环瓜氨酸肽抗体阳性影响类风湿关节炎的表现。","authors":"Li Huan Angela Marie Chan, Khai Pang Leong, Justina Wei Lynn Tan, Xiao Gao, Wei Qiang See, Ee Tzun Koh","doi":"10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2021-104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (ACPA) are used in the diagnosis and prognostication of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We wanted to determine the specific contributions of RF and ACPA to the biological nature of RA and whether they act synergistically.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified 731 patients from our prospective multi-ethnic RA cohort and categorised them into four groups: ACPA-positive, RF-positive, doubly positive and doubly negative. We compared the demographics, Disease Activity Score-28, Health Assessment Questionnaire score, quality of life using Short Form 36 and the use of prednisolone and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) of these patient groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred and ninety-one patients (67.2%) were ACPA+RF+, 54 (7.4%) were ACPA+RF-, 82 (11.2%) were ACPA-RF+ and 104 (14.2%) were ACPA-RF-. Mean disease duration before the study entry was not different in the four groups. Patients with older age of onset were less likely to be positive for RF and ACPA. Fewer ACPA+RF+ patients were in remission compared to those in the other groups ( P < 0.05). Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was higher at study entry in the ACPA+RF+ group (40.4 mm/h vs. 30.6-30.9 mm/h, P < 0.05). Prednisolone and number of DMARDs used were higher in the ACPA+RF+ group compared to the doubly negative group. There were no differences in the functional status and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RA patients who were positive for both ACPA and RF had lower remission rate, higher baseline ESR and required more corticosteroid and DMARD treatment compared to those who were singly positive or doubly negative. Being doubly positive confers a worse outcome to RA patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":21752,"journal":{"name":"Singapore medical journal","volume":" ","pages":"486-491"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dual rheumatoid factor and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody positivity affects the manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis.\",\"authors\":\"Li Huan Angela Marie Chan, Khai Pang Leong, Justina Wei Lynn Tan, Xiao Gao, Wei Qiang See, Ee Tzun Koh\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2021-104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (ACPA) are used in the diagnosis and prognostication of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We wanted to determine the specific contributions of RF and ACPA to the biological nature of RA and whether they act synergistically.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified 731 patients from our prospective multi-ethnic RA cohort and categorised them into four groups: ACPA-positive, RF-positive, doubly positive and doubly negative. We compared the demographics, Disease Activity Score-28, Health Assessment Questionnaire score, quality of life using Short Form 36 and the use of prednisolone and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) of these patient groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred and ninety-one patients (67.2%) were ACPA+RF+, 54 (7.4%) were ACPA+RF-, 82 (11.2%) were ACPA-RF+ and 104 (14.2%) were ACPA-RF-. Mean disease duration before the study entry was not different in the four groups. Patients with older age of onset were less likely to be positive for RF and ACPA. Fewer ACPA+RF+ patients were in remission compared to those in the other groups ( P < 0.05). Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was higher at study entry in the ACPA+RF+ group (40.4 mm/h vs. 30.6-30.9 mm/h, P < 0.05). Prednisolone and number of DMARDs used were higher in the ACPA+RF+ group compared to the doubly negative group. There were no differences in the functional status and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RA patients who were positive for both ACPA and RF had lower remission rate, higher baseline ESR and required more corticosteroid and DMARD treatment compared to those who were singly positive or doubly negative. Being doubly positive confers a worse outcome to RA patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Singapore medical journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"486-491\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Singapore medical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2021-104\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/4/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Singapore medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2021-104","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
类风湿因子(RF)和抗环瓜氨酸肽抗体(ACPA)用于类风湿关节炎(RA)的诊断和预后。我们想确定RF和ACPA对RA生物学性质的具体贡献,以及它们是否协同作用。方法:我们从前瞻性多种族RA队列中筛选出731例患者,并将其分为四组:acpa阳性、rf阳性、双阳性和双阴性。我们比较了这些患者组的人口统计学、疾病活动评分-28、健康评估问卷评分、使用短表36的生活质量以及泼尼松龙和改善疾病的抗风湿药物(DMARDs)的使用。结果:ACPA+RF+ 491例(67.2%),ACPA+RF- 54例(7.4%),ACPA-RF+ 82例(11.2%),ACPA-RF- 104例(14.2%)。四组患者入组前的平均疾病持续时间没有差异。发病年龄较大的患者RF和ACPA阳性的可能性较小。与其他组相比,ACPA+RF+患者缓解较少(P < 0.05)。ACPA+RF+组的红细胞沉降率(ESR)在研究开始时更高(40.4 mm/h vs. 30.6-30.9 mm/h, P < 0.05)。与双阴性组相比,ACPA+RF+组使用泼尼松龙和dmard的数量更高。两组患者的功能状态和生活质量无差异。结论:与单纯阳性或双阴性的RA患者相比,ACPA和RF均阳性的RA患者缓解率较低,基线ESR较高,需要更多的皮质类固醇和DMARD治疗。双阳性会给RA患者带来更糟糕的结果。
Dual rheumatoid factor and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody positivity affects the manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis.
Introduction: Rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (ACPA) are used in the diagnosis and prognostication of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We wanted to determine the specific contributions of RF and ACPA to the biological nature of RA and whether they act synergistically.
Methods: We identified 731 patients from our prospective multi-ethnic RA cohort and categorised them into four groups: ACPA-positive, RF-positive, doubly positive and doubly negative. We compared the demographics, Disease Activity Score-28, Health Assessment Questionnaire score, quality of life using Short Form 36 and the use of prednisolone and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) of these patient groups.
Results: Four hundred and ninety-one patients (67.2%) were ACPA+RF+, 54 (7.4%) were ACPA+RF-, 82 (11.2%) were ACPA-RF+ and 104 (14.2%) were ACPA-RF-. Mean disease duration before the study entry was not different in the four groups. Patients with older age of onset were less likely to be positive for RF and ACPA. Fewer ACPA+RF+ patients were in remission compared to those in the other groups ( P < 0.05). Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was higher at study entry in the ACPA+RF+ group (40.4 mm/h vs. 30.6-30.9 mm/h, P < 0.05). Prednisolone and number of DMARDs used were higher in the ACPA+RF+ group compared to the doubly negative group. There were no differences in the functional status and quality of life.
Conclusions: RA patients who were positive for both ACPA and RF had lower remission rate, higher baseline ESR and required more corticosteroid and DMARD treatment compared to those who were singly positive or doubly negative. Being doubly positive confers a worse outcome to RA patients.
期刊介绍:
The Singapore Medical Journal (SMJ) is the monthly publication of Singapore Medical Association (SMA). The Journal aims to advance medical practice and clinical research by publishing high-quality articles that add to the clinical knowledge of physicians in Singapore and worldwide.
SMJ is a general medical journal that focuses on all aspects of human health. The Journal publishes commissioned reviews, commentaries and editorials, original research, a small number of outstanding case reports, continuing medical education articles (ECG Series, Clinics in Diagnostic Imaging, Pictorial Essays, Practice Integration & Life-long Learning [PILL] Series), and short communications in the form of letters to the editor.