住院康复患者使用q12小时和q8小时肝素预防DVT/PE的回顾性分析

IF 1.1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Adam Dashner, Erin Siders PharmD
{"title":"住院康复患者使用q12小时和q8小时肝素预防DVT/PE的回顾性分析","authors":"Adam Dashner,&nbsp;Erin Siders PharmD","doi":"10.1177/87551225221094171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> There is little clinical evidence comparing the safety and efficacy of prophylactic subcutaneous heparin given every 8 hours and every 12 hours. We performed a retrospective analysis incorporating these dosing intervals in an inpatient rehabilitation setting. <b>Methods</b>: Heparin usage data was collected and patient charts were analyzed for both therapeutic failure and bleeding events. A 2-tailed Fisher's exact test was performed for both outcomes, with a <i>P</i>-value of less than 0.05 being considered significant. Odds ratios were also calculated with <i>P</i>-values less than 0.05 being considered significant. <b>Study Population</b>: A Cerner report was run to identify patients ordered prophylactic heparin in an inpatient rehabilitation setting from April 7, 2020, to October 27, 2021. One hundred patients receiving heparin every 8 hours and every 12 hours were randomly selected for chart review. These study groups were further stratified by Padua risk scores. <b>Results</b>: In both groups, 4 (4.0%) patients were identified as having a documented bleeding event and 2 (2.0%) patients from each group were identified as having a therapy failure. <b>Conclusion</b>: For both endpoints, no significant differences in bleeding rates or therapy failure rates were detected in any of the population stratifications.</p>","PeriodicalId":16796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9272488/pdf/10.1177_87551225221094171.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Retrospective Analysis of q12hr and q8hr Heparin for DVT/PE Prophylaxis in an Inpatient Rehabilitation Setting.\",\"authors\":\"Adam Dashner,&nbsp;Erin Siders PharmD\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/87551225221094171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> There is little clinical evidence comparing the safety and efficacy of prophylactic subcutaneous heparin given every 8 hours and every 12 hours. We performed a retrospective analysis incorporating these dosing intervals in an inpatient rehabilitation setting. <b>Methods</b>: Heparin usage data was collected and patient charts were analyzed for both therapeutic failure and bleeding events. A 2-tailed Fisher's exact test was performed for both outcomes, with a <i>P</i>-value of less than 0.05 being considered significant. Odds ratios were also calculated with <i>P</i>-values less than 0.05 being considered significant. <b>Study Population</b>: A Cerner report was run to identify patients ordered prophylactic heparin in an inpatient rehabilitation setting from April 7, 2020, to October 27, 2021. One hundred patients receiving heparin every 8 hours and every 12 hours were randomly selected for chart review. These study groups were further stratified by Padua risk scores. <b>Results</b>: In both groups, 4 (4.0%) patients were identified as having a documented bleeding event and 2 (2.0%) patients from each group were identified as having a therapy failure. <b>Conclusion</b>: For both endpoints, no significant differences in bleeding rates or therapy failure rates were detected in any of the population stratifications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmacy Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9272488/pdf/10.1177_87551225221094171.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmacy Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/87551225221094171\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87551225221094171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:比较每8小时皮下注射预防性肝素和每12小时皮下注射预防性肝素的安全性和有效性的临床证据很少。我们进行了回顾性分析,纳入这些给药间隔在住院康复设置。方法:收集肝素使用资料,分析治疗失败和出血事件的患者病历。对两个结果进行双尾Fisher精确检验,p值小于0.05被认为是显著的。以p值小于0.05为显著值计算优势比。研究人群:Cerner报告确定了2020年4月7日至2021年10月27日住院康复机构中订购预防性肝素的患者。随机选取每8小时和每12小时接受肝素治疗的患者100例进行图表回顾。这些研究组通过Padua风险评分进一步分层。结果:在两组中,4例(4.0%)患者被确定为有记录的出血事件,两组中有2例(2.0%)患者被确定为治疗失败。结论:对于两个终点,在任何人群分层中均未发现出血率或治疗失败率的显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Retrospective Analysis of q12hr and q8hr Heparin for DVT/PE Prophylaxis in an Inpatient Rehabilitation Setting.

Purpose: There is little clinical evidence comparing the safety and efficacy of prophylactic subcutaneous heparin given every 8 hours and every 12 hours. We performed a retrospective analysis incorporating these dosing intervals in an inpatient rehabilitation setting. Methods: Heparin usage data was collected and patient charts were analyzed for both therapeutic failure and bleeding events. A 2-tailed Fisher's exact test was performed for both outcomes, with a P-value of less than 0.05 being considered significant. Odds ratios were also calculated with P-values less than 0.05 being considered significant. Study Population: A Cerner report was run to identify patients ordered prophylactic heparin in an inpatient rehabilitation setting from April 7, 2020, to October 27, 2021. One hundred patients receiving heparin every 8 hours and every 12 hours were randomly selected for chart review. These study groups were further stratified by Padua risk scores. Results: In both groups, 4 (4.0%) patients were identified as having a documented bleeding event and 2 (2.0%) patients from each group were identified as having a therapy failure. Conclusion: For both endpoints, no significant differences in bleeding rates or therapy failure rates were detected in any of the population stratifications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmacy Technology
Journal of Pharmacy Technology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: For both pharmacists and technicians, jPT provides valuable information for those interested in the entire body of pharmacy practice. jPT covers new drugs, products, and equipment; therapeutic trends; organizational, legal, and educational activities; drug distribution and administration; and includes continuing education articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信